Tag Archives for Medicare

Modest Social Security COLA increase seen as chump change by some

Published in RINewsToday on October 16, 2023

Last week, the Social Security Administration (SSA) announced that Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits for more than 71 million beneficiaries will increase 3.2% in 2024, about $59 per month starting in January. The 2024 payment declined from last year’s 8.7%, but that had been the highest in four decades. And, its higher than the average 2.6% increase recorded over the past 20 years.

The Social Security Act determined how the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) is calculated. Enacted on August 14, 1935, the Act ties the annual COLA to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) as determined by the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics.

More than 66 million Social Security beneficiaries will see that COLA increase 3.2% beginning in January 2024, and increased payments to approximately 7.5 million people receiving SSI will begin on December 29, 2023. (Note: some people receive both Social Security and SSI benefits).  

“Social Security and SSI benefits will increase in 2024, and this will help millions of people keep up with expenses,” observes Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security in an Oct. 12 statement announcing this year’s COLA increase.

According to SSA, some other adjustments that will also take effect in January of each year are based on the increase in average wages. Based on that increase, the maximum amount of earnings subject to the Social Security tax (taxable maximum) will increase to $168,600 from $160,200.

Advocacy groups on aging talk turkey about COLA

“The annual COLA is a reminder of Social Security’s unique importance. Unlike private-sector pension plans, whose benefits erode over time, Social Security is designed to keep up with rising prices, noted Nancy Altman, President of the Washington, DC-based Social Security Works (SSW), in response to SSA’s COLA announcement.  

“Retirees can rest a little easier at night knowing they will soon receive an increase in their Social Security checks to help them keep up with rising prices,” said Jo Ann Jenkins, AARP chief executive. “We know older Americans are still feeling the sting when they buy groceries and gas, making every dollar important,” she added, stressing that Social Security has been the foundation for financial security for hundreds of millions of retirees. “SSA’s COLA announcement shows that it’s continuing to deliver on this promise,” she says.  

However, Max Richtman, President and CEO, National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare charges, “While we are grateful that Social Security is the only major retirement program with a built-in cost-of-living adjustment, the current formula for determining COLAs is inherently flawed. SSA’s current COLA formula doesn’t truly reflect the increase in prices for the goods and services that beneficiaries rely on.”

According to Richtman, the 3.2% 2024 COLA only represents a modest $59 increase in the average monthly benefit for retired workers, and that’s before deducting the projected increase in the 2024 Medicare Part B premium of about $10 per month. Because of this the average retirement beneficiary will receive a net COLA of about $50. 

Richtman notes, “That is not enough for a tank of gas or half a week’s worth of groceries in many states. The net COLA will barely cover one brand-name prescription co-pay for some patients.”  

Last year, Richtman noted that the COLA of 8.7% was unusually high, the highest in some 40 years. But post-pandemic inflation was also at record highs, he said, noting that historically, COLA’s have been relatively low. In fact, the COLA has been ZERO; three times since 2009.  

“Seniors deserve an accurate COLA formula that accounts for the impact of inflation on their living costs. That is supposed to be the entire purpose of a COLA. The current formula measures the impact of inflation on urban wage earners and clerical workers. How is that a reasonable formula for seniors? Seniors have different spending patterns than urban wage earners & clerical workers,” asks Richtman.  

Richtman notes that seniors spend more than other age group on expenses like housing, long-term care, and medical services. “We strongly favor the adoption of the CPI-E (Consumer Price for the Elderly) for calculating COLAs. The CPI-E would more accurately reflect the impact of inflation on the goods and services seniors need, he believes. 

The CPI-E is included in both major pieces of legislation to expand and protect Social Security that have been introduced in this Congress: Bernie Sanders’ Social Security Expansion Act and Rep. John Larson’s Social Security 2100 Act.  We have endorsed both of those bills as part of our commitment to boosting Social Security for current and future retirees. It’s past time for Congress to act,” says Richtman. 

Although the 3.2% COLA is well above the 2.6% average over the past 20 years, a newly released retirement survey released on Oct. 12, 2023, by The Senior Citizens League (TSCL) indicates that seniors are pessimistic about their financial well-being in the upcoming months and very concerned about growing calls on Capitol Hill for Social Security cuts. Sixty-eight percent of survey participants report that their household expenses remain at least 10 percent higher than one year ago, although the overall inflation rate has slowed. This situation has persisted over the past 12 months.

According to TSCL’s latest retirement survey, worry that retirement income won’t be enough to cover the cost of essentials in the coming months is a top concern of 56 percent of survey respondents. Social Security benefit cuts are an even bigger concern, ranked as the number one worry by nearly 6 out of 10 survey participants, or 59%. Over the past year, benefit cuts and trims have affected a large percentage of older Americans low-income households, individuals who can least afford them.

A year ago, TSCL warned that higher incomes due to the 5.9% and 8.7% COLAs in 2022 and 2023 could potentially affect eligibility for low-income assistance programs such as SNAP and rental assistance. Earlier this year, federal emergency COVID assistance for SNAP (food stamps) and Medicaid also ended. Surveys conducted in 2022 and this year suggest that significant numbers of lower-income older households have lost access to some safety net programs over the past 12 months, the survey finds.

A Final Note…

Social Security plans to start notifying beneficiaries about their new COLA amount by mail starting in early December. Individuals who have a personal “my Social Security account” can view their COLA notice online, which is secure, easy, and faster than receiving a letter in the mail. People can set up text or email alerts when there is a new message–such as their COLA notice—instead of waiting for them in my Social Security.

People will need to have a “my Social Security account” by November 14 to see their COLA notice online. To get started, visit www.ssa.gov/myaccount.

Information about Medicare changes for 2024 will be available at www.medicare.gov. For Social Security beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare, their new 2024 benefit amount will be available in December through the mailed COLA notice and my Social Security’s Message Center.

For details about SSA’s 2024 Changes, go to: https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/factsheets/colafacts2024.pdf.

AARP report: States’ care for seniors “painfully inadquate”. Major gaps in RI

Published in RINewsToday on October 2, 2023

Last week, the Washington, DC-based AARP released its latest Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) Scorecard, calling care provided to seniors and persons with disabilities during the last three years after the COVID-19 pandemic “painfully inadequate.”  This nine-page report detailed state specific data, finds major gaps in providing care in every state, including Rhode Island, especially in these categories:  “Housing for Older Adults”, “Home Care Costs” and “Home Health Aide Supply”. 

The LTSS Scorecard, consisting of 50 indicators, focused on: affordability and access; choice of setting and provider; safety and quality; support for family caregivers; and community integration, using data from a variety of publicly available sources, such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, American Community Survey, and Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Many benefits of accessing the data

According to AARP, this Scorecard can be a roadmap for improving the LTSS systems and the lives of those who rely on assistance.  Many others will benefit by reviewing this data, too. Federal, state, and local policy makers can identify priorities and ensure resources are allocated equitably. Aging advocates can glean public data and hold government officials accountable. Family caregivers can identify needed resources and become actively involved in policy discussions and advocacy. Seniors relying on long-term care programs and services can learn to inspire culture change and demand available tools. Finally, employers can improve workplace policies and practices to assist caregivers and healthcare groups so they can explore public-private partnerships and alliances. 

Like the findings reported in AARP’s LTSS Scorecard in 2020, Rhode Island ranked 12th in the country in 2023, but this year’s Scorecard reveals that the state has made some progress in improving care options for older Rhode Islanders, specifically the enrollment in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), as well as the availability of Adult Day Services.

“The pandemic reinforced the need to strengthen long-term care for countless loved ones across the country, including here in Rhode Island,” said AARP Rhode Island State Director Catherine Taylor in a Sept. 28th statement announcing the release of the 2023 LTSS Scorecard. 

“AARP’s Scorecard shows that there are many roads to meet the needs of all Rhode Islanders who deserve the very best care, including the 121,000 family caregivers in our state. The overwhelming majority — 87% — of Rhode Islanders age 45+ would prefer to receive care for themselves or loved ones at home with caregiver assistance. Yet, our low rankings in Housing for Older Adults (51st), Home Care Costs (43rd) and Home Health Aide Supply (41st) underscore how difficult it is for them to age the way they choose. It’s time to accelerate our efforts, for the sake of saving more lives,” she says.  

RI is dead last in housing

“In particular, Rhode Island’s dismal ranking for Housing for Older Adults – dead last – points to the urgent need to increase the supply of affordable, accessible housing. We can do that by passing legislation early in 2024 to strengthen homeowners’ ability to build an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) to allow them to age in place, support a family member, or house a caregiver,” Taylor said.

A national snapshot of the LTSS Scorecard’s 2023 Data

According to Scorecard, 12 states, including Rhode Island, have enacted paid family leave laws and 18 states have paid sick day laws, which can be used to assist caregivers. AARP’s latest Scorecard also reported that only 6 states provide a tax credit for family caregivers’ out-of-pocket expenses. Rhode Island does not provide a tax credit – nor is it among the 7 states that have statewide laws protecting caregivers from discrimination in the workplace that ensure they are not unfairly treated due to caregiving duties outside of work.

Meanwhile, it was reported that dozens of states experienced declines in the number of care choices that help support family caregivers. For instance, 16 states, including Rhode Island, had declines of 10% or more in access to home health aides since 2019. 

Regarding Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS), the LTSS Scorecard reported that 11 states, including Rhode Island, had state policies that improve presumptive eligibility for Medicaid HCBS at the time of data collection, making it possible for people to go home to receive care after being in the hospital – rather than having to be admitted to a nursing home while their eligibility for Medicaid payments is being determined.

The research indicated that many states also have large numbers of people with low care needs living in nursing homes, indicating a lack of HCBS access and services. More than 20% of nursing home residents in Rhode Island have low needs – compared to 9% nationally.

Data confirms Major Workforce Crisis in nursing facilities across US

As to nursing homes and institutional care, the AARP’s 2023 Scorecard confirmed that a  major workforce crisis exists in facilities across the country. Across all states, wages for direct care workers are lower than wages for comparable occupations, with shortfalls ranging from $1.56 to $5.03 per hour. In Rhode Island, wages are $1.79 lower than other entry level jobs.   

Nationally, more than 50% of nursing staff in nursing facilities leave their job within a year (53.9% turnover rate). However, in Rhode Island, the rate is slightly better than the average, at 49.3% – with Montana, Vermont, and New Mexico experiencing the highest averages in staffing turnover.  

Staffing disparities are also a significant challenge, say researchers, noting that residents of nursing facilities with high admissions of Black residents receive almost 200 fewer hours of care per year compared to residents of facilities with high admissions of white residents. 

According to the LTSS Scorecard, only 22% of nursing facility residents live in a facility with a 5-star rating in the US – with less than the national average, about 20.2%, of Rhode Island residents living in a 5-star facility. Gaps in workforce and equity result in persistent problems in care, say the researchers. One measure, pressure sores, can be life-threatening as they can lead to bone or joint infections, cancer, and sepsis. In this measure, 10% of facility residents nationwide experienced a pressure sore.

Finally, this year’s Scorecard announced that there is progress being made to create innovative and effective alternatives to traditional nursing facility models. Specifically, the researchers say that 10 states, including Rhode Island, made strides in nursing home innovations, such as by utilizing Green House® Nursing Home availability and policies, which includes small facilities, private rooms, and other best practices.

AARP’s 2023 LTSS Scorecard identified recommendations that can fix the nation’s delivery of long-term care programs and services to enable seniors to age in place in their communities. It called for increasing support to the nation’s 48 million family caregivers, “who are the backbone of the long-term care system, providing over $600 billion in unpaid care, such as with paid leave, tax credits, and other mechanisms to address health and financial needs.”

AARP Rhode Island continues to call on the Rhode Island General Assembly to support the state’s 121,000 family caregivers by advocating for enhancements to the state’s Temporary Caregivers Insurance program.

Recommendations on enhancing Long-Term Services and Supports

The Scorecard’s recommendations also called for investing in states’ Home and Community-based Care Infrastructure, by increasing support and training for home health aides and home visits, supporting the ability to access and use medical devices and equipment, and updating key Medicaid regulations and payment models.  

To tackle the workforce crisis, a recommendation suggests that it is crucial to support both nursing facility and in-home workforce by improving recruitment and training, increasing pay, and expanding the ability of trained nurses, aides, community health workers and other paraprofessionals to take on some aspects of care. States can choose to enact and enforce staffing and related care standards.

A recommendation also calls on States to expand the use of innovative, effective models for nursing homes can improve both quality of care and quality of life, such as with smaller facilities and private rooms and to address inequities by investing to close the staggering gaps in access to quality care and facilities and staffing shortages.

(Editor’s Note:  During the pandemic, then Governor Gina Raimondo allocated $5 million towards 2 changes in nursing homes – making all rooms private and providing non-shared, private bathrooms – for all residents – efforts to follow up on this effort have not resulted in what happened to that initiative according to the RI Department of Health).

Another recommendation urges states to create multisector plans for aging and building of coalitions and age-friendly health systems, to help seniors to age in place at home by having affordable and accessible housing and transportation, improved community design, and comprehensive emergency preparedness plans.

Researchers also suggested the advancing innovation in cities, counties, and states by supporting comprehensive state- and community-wide aging plans and piloting new approaches and programs, like Green House® Nursing Homes and presumptive eligibility, that can then be scaled.

Finally, Climate Change is increasing national disasters, and the LTSS Scorecard recommends that every state have a sound emergency preparedness plan to support nursing home residents, in particular, in times of crisis – including natural disaster.

“AARP’s LTSS Scorecard shows some progress and innovation, but there’s still a long way to go before we have systems that allow people to age well, and independently, for as long as possible and support the nation’s 48 million family caregivers. It’s also clear some emerging issues deserve more attention – from whether nursing homes are prepared to confront natural disasters, to whether they have plans in place to maintain and grow their workforces,” says Susan Reinhard, Senior Vice President, AARP Public Policy Institute.

The LTSS Scorecard is a charitable project made possible by a grant from AARP Foundation, with support from The SCAN Foundation, The Commonwealth Fund, and The John A. Hartford Foundation, and has been updated every three years since 2011.

To view the full Scorecard and state-by-state information visit https://ltsschoices.aarp.org/ 

To view the Scorecard for specifically Rhode Island, go to:  https://ltsschoices.aarp.org/scorecard-report/2023/states/rhode-island.

To view Previous Scorecards (2011, 2014, 2017 and 2020) go to https://ltsschoices.aarp.org/scorecard-report/report-archive/

Increased funding must be tied to nursing home mandated minimum staffing

Published in RINewToday on Sept 25, 2023

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule to establish comprehensive staffing requirements for nursing homes—including, for the first time, national minimum nurse staffing standards. The proposed rule seeks to would ratchet up the quality of care in the nation’s 18,700 skilled nursing facilities, delivering care to 1.2 million residents each day.

“Establishing minimum staffing standards for nursing homes will improve resident safety and promote high-quality care so residents and their families can have peace of mind,” said HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra in comments on Sept. 1, 2023. “When facilities are understaffed, residents suffer. They might be unable to use the bathroom, shower, maintain hygiene, change clothes, get out of bed, or have someone respond to their call for assistance. Comprehensive staffing reforms can improve working conditions, leading to higher wages and better retention for this dedicated workforce,” says Becerra.

The Nuts and Bolts of CMS’s proposed ruling

Under CMS’s proposal, nursing homes participating in Medicare and Medicaid would be required to meet specific nurse staffing levels that promote safe, high-quality care for residents. Nursing homes would need to provide residents with a minimum of 0.55 hours of care from a registered nurse per resident, per day, and 2.45 hours of care from a nurse’s aide per resident, per day, exceeding existing standards in nearly all states. CMS estimates approximately 75% of nursing homes would have to strengthen staffing in their facilities. As the long-term care sector continues to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, the proposed standards take into consideration local realities in rural and underserved communities through staggered implementation and exemptions processes.

In addition, nursing homes would also be required to ensure a registered nurse is on site 24 hours a day, 7 days per week, and to complete robust facility assessments on staffing needs. Facilities would continue to be required to provide staffing that meets the needs of the individual residents they serve, which may require higher levels of staffing above the proposed minimum standards.  

CMS also proposed to require states to collect and report on compensation for workers as a percentage of Medicaid payments for those working in nursing homes and intermediate care facilities. These policies build on CMS’ recent proposals to support compensation for direct care workers in home and community based settings and to publish Medicaid data on average hourly pay rates for home care workers. This enhanced transparency will aid efforts to support and stabilize the long-term care workforce across settings strengthening access to high-quality long-term care both at home, in the community as well as in nursing homes and other facilities.

Attracting and supporting Nursing Home staff

Additionally, CMS announced a national campaign to support staffing in nursing homes. As part of the HHS Workforce Initiative, CMS will work with the Health Resources and Services Administration and other partners to make it easier for individuals to enter careers in nursing homes, investing over $75 million in financial incentives, such as scholarships and tuition reimbursement. This staffing campaign builds on other actions by HHS and the Department of Labor to build the nursing workforce.

More than 500,000 direct care workers provide care in nursing homes, assisting residents with daily tasks, such as bathing, dressing, mobility, and eating. This work, often performed primarily by women of color, is significantly undervalued. Direct care workers across long-term care settings earn low wages, rarely receive health and retirement benefits, and experience high injury rates. Improving working conditions and wages will lead to improvements in the recruitment and retention of direct care workers and enable nursing staff to provide safer care.  

CMS and the HHS Office of the Inspector General called for increased transparency and enhance enforcement of existing standards. This would result from increased audits of nursing homes’ staff, improving nursing  home inspections, oversight as to how nursing homes spend taxpayer dollars and cracking down on prescribing inappropriate antipsychotic drug prescribing practices.  The proposed rule would also undertake new efforts to improve resident safety during emergencies. 

Mandating more staffing during a severe labor shortage – pushback on an unfunded mandate

“It is unfathomable that the Biden administration is proceeding with this federal staffing mandate proposal. Especially when just days ago, we learned that CMS’ own study found that there is no single staffing level that would guarantee quality care, says Mark Parkinson, President and CEO of the American Health Care Association, a national nursing home trade group representing 14,000 nursing homes and other long-term care facilities across the nation taking care of five million residents each year.

“At the very same time, nursing homes are facing the worst labor shortage in our sector’s history, and seniors’ access to care is under threat. This unfunded mandate, which will cost billions of dollars each year, will worsen this growing crisis, warns Parkinson, noting that the proposed rule requires nursing homes to hire tens of thousands of nurses that are simply not there and then penalizes the facilities and threatens to displace hundreds of thousands of residents.

“Already, hundreds of nursing homes across the U.S. have closed because of a lack of workers,” states Parkinson. 

​John E. Gage, President, and CEO of the Rhode Island Health Care Association, with offices in Warwick, agrees with Parkinson’s assessment of the harm such proposals will trigger and its devastating impact on nursing homes and residents. “The federal staffing proposal is unfunded and is being implemented at a time when additional staff is simply not available,” he said.  

According to Gage, six Rhode Island-based facilities have closed since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020. Three others are currently in receivership. Arbitrary federal staffing mandates will result in more closures, and residents will be displaced from their homes just as they were most recently when Charlesgate Nursing Center in Providence was forced to close because of skyrocketing costs, a scarcity of staff and chronically inadequate Medicaid funding. 

Unintended consequences of mandating minimum staffing

James Nyberg, president, and CEO of LeadingAge Rhode Island, with offices in East Providence, views see a staffing ratio mandate as a blunt enforcement instrument that does not consider the numerous challenges facing providers, including Medicaid underfunding, lack of workforce, and the diversity of resident needs. Moreover, the imposition of severe financial penalties on homes that are unable to meet a staffing ratio is counterproductive: fines siphon off scarce resources that providers need as they seek to address their workforce and resident care needs,” he says. 

“Our state’s experience illustrates the numerous challenges and unintended consequences of a staffing ratio mandate: the severity of fines, how compliance is measured and calculated, compliance costs, backlogs of people in hospitals waiting for skilled nursing care after admissions have been reduced due to a lack of staff and other access-related issues,” notes Nyberg, noting that even those homes that are currently able to comply with the staffing ratio are doing so at an unsustainable cost. 

While Kathleen Heren, executive director of the Alliance for Better Long-Term Care and the state’s Long-Term Care Ombudsman, supports HHS’s minimum staffing standard, the administration must adequately fund to train recruited workers and to pay a livable wage to retain them. “Rhode Island doesn’t have an issue with its nursing home inspection process as other states do, she says, noting that newly hired RI Department of Health surveyors are “doing a great job.” 

“RIDOH surveyors only cite facilities, when necessary,” says Heren, noting that administrators can challenge any cited deficiency if they view it as unfair, and she doesn’t see a problem in the use of antipsychotic medications in Rhode Island facilities “but acknowledges that there’s always room for improvement.”

Direct Caregivers, mainly women, undervalued despite significant work demands

“Almost 80 percent of nursing home care is paid for with government programs (Medicare and Medicaid), so it is hugely important that those dollars provide quality care,” says Maureen Maigret, chairperson of the aging in community subcommittee for the Long Term Care Coordinating Council.  She noted that studies show a clear relationship between staff levels and quality care but there is tremendous variation across the states in hours of direct care staff provided in nursing homes. 

“Rhode Island has required 24/7 RN staffing for many years and a 2021 state law requires minimum direct care staffing levels although implementation has been challenging due to the critical workforce shortage. Importantly, the proposed federal regulation would require states to report on compensation for workers as a percentage of Medicaid payments. For too long our direct care workers, mostly women, have been undervalued despite the significant demands of their work. It is time for them to receive a living wage and  shedding light on where our Medicaid dollars are going will help advocate for better wages helping to recruit and retain these essential workers,”  she says.

There will be a 60-day comment period for the notice of proposed rulemaking, and comments must be submitted to the Federal Register no later than November 6, 2023.  

For a copy of the federal register detailing CMS’s proposed rules on minimum staffing issued on Sept. 6, 2023, go to 

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-09-06/pdf/2023-18781.pd

For a copy of a CMS Fact Sheet on CMS’s proposed rules on minimum staffing, go to https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/medicare-and-medicaid-programs-minimum-staffing-standards-long-term-care-facilities-and-medicaid