US Senate Special Committee on Aging holds its First Hearing on Menopause

Published in RINewsToday on September 21, 2026

For generations, menopause was a health issue that many women were expected to deal with on their own, quietly. Last week, the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging took the issue into the public discussion, holding the first congressional hearing devoted exclusively to menopause.

The Sept. 16 hearing brought congressional attention to an issue affecting millions of American women navigating perimenopause, menopause and post-menopause. Approximately 2 million more women enter menopause each year.

Menopause affects women differently, but the symptoms can upend daily life. Women may experience hot flashes, vaginal dryness, insomnia, migraine headaches, brain fog, heart palpitations, mood changes, and changes in metabolism. For some, these symptoms become debilitating, disrupting daily and work routines and quality of life.

Senate Aging Committee Chairman Rick Scott (R-FL) and Ranking Member Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) convened the hearing, titled “Half the Country, Zero Hearings: Meeting the Moment to End the Menopause Care Gap in America,” to examine what lawmakers call the nation’s “menopause care gap.”

Medical experts, researchers, and women’s health advocates testified about the lack of research, physician training, and access to treatment.

The Senate Aging Committee hearing was a critical step in elevating this issue to determine what’s needed to improve medical research, training, and care for women experiencing menopause,” said Gillibrand in her opening statement.

“Menopause affects half of the population. For generations, women have been told to suffer in silence. I’m done with this silence,” she said.

Even though women in midlife make up a significant portion of the U.S. population, Gillibrand called menopause “one of the most under-researched, undertreated, and under-discussed” health issues in the nation. She pointed to estimates that less than 1% of federal women’s health research funding goes to menopause.

Gillibrand also noted that about 80% of OB-GYN residents report feeling ill-prepared to discuss menopause or its symptoms. The result, she said, is that many women seeking medical care are left without adequate treatment.

Menopause care also carries an economic cost. Gillibrand cited a Mayo Clinic study estimating that menopause costs the U.S. economy $26.6 billion annually, including $1.8 billion in lost work time.

“There’s simply no excuse for the lack of resources and information to help every woman navigate menopause and the challenges that come with it,” said Scott in his opening statement.

Scott cautioned that there is no “one-size-fits-all solution.” Instead, he called for women to have access to reliable information, qualified health care providers, and treatment options that allow them to make informed decisions about their health.

Scott also pointed to hormone replacement therapy as a safe treatment option for many women, while noting that lack of education and access can make it difficult for women to obtain appropriate treatment.

“We also need providers who have the most up-to-date training and who can clearly discuss treatment options with their patients,” said Scott, pointing to the shortage of health care providers as another barrier to care.

Scott and Gillibrand also announced that they sent a bipartisan letter requesting the Government Accountability Office to examine how the federal government both coordinates and funds menopause research and care. The senators say the report could help identify remaining gaps in research, education and treatment.

More Research Needed

Federal funding for research advancing menopause care is inadequate, Dr. Jean Wactawski-Wende, a SUNY Distinguished Professor who has conducted women’s health research for more than four decades, charged.

“In 1985, the National Institutes of Health put forward a study…the report said we’re not doing enough research on women…I’d argue we are now 35 years later, and we have not come all that far,” she told the committee.

“Clinical trials are the gold standard of evidence, and we do not have enough of those trials in women, especially in postmenopausal women,” added Wactawski-Wende.

She identified four areas needing greater attention: increased federal research on women’s health throughout the lifespan; chronic disease in aging women; better education and clinical care after menopause; and greater attention to healthy behaviors throughout life.

Dr. Lynne M. Coslett-Charlton, a board-certified gynecologist who has practiced in Northeastern Pennsylvania for 27 years, pointed to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s recent changes to warning labels for menopausal hormone therapy as a major shift in women’s treatment.

Coslett-Charlton also voiced concern that women might get menopause advice from social media influencers instead of from qualified clinicians. This could, in turn, lead them to buy unregulated supplements and products.

She noted that the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has increased its educational efforts to steer patients toward safe, evidence-based, and medically appropriate care. Coslett-Charlton and ACOG also support passage of the Advancing Menopause Care and Midlife Women’s Health Act.

Training Doctors to Treat Menopause

Jennifer Weiss-Wolf, executive director of NYU Law’s Birnbaum Women’s Leadership Center, urged Congress to make telehealth part of the solution. She told lawmakers that virtual care could help connect women, particularly those in areas without specialists, to providers knowledgeable about menopause.

But telehealth has its own barriers, she cautioned, including poor internet connectivity and inadequate insurance coverage. Weiss-Wolf also warned that physician education about menopause must improve.

“For those who started residency after 2002 — statistically that amounts to more than half of all practicing OB-GYNs in the U.S. today — the majority have not had meaningful or even any menopause training,” she said.

Weiss-Wolf called for modern clinical trials that include millennial and Gen X women, with racial, ethnic and geographic diversity. She also urged researchers to use technology better to collect data and track symptoms.

She called on lawmakers to pass three federal bills to increase research and attention to women’s health: the Advancing Menopause Care and Midlife Women’s Health Act; the Service Women and Veterans Menopause Research Act; and the Hormone Health Data and Research Act.

“I Want to Feel Like Myself Again”

“When I ask patients what they hope to get from their care, I often hear, ‘I want to feel like myself again,’” said Dr. Suzanne Silverman Fenske, an obstetrician-gynecologist and integrative medicine practitioner who has practiced in New York City for nearly two decades.

“They want their energy back, relief from anxiety, and a sense of control over a body that suddenly feels unfamiliar,” she said, adding that she

Fenske told the Senate panel that before menopause, a woman’s risk of chronic disease is generally lower than a man’s. After menopause, that risk increases. She pointed to heart disease, hip fractures and urinary sepsis among the serious health problems facing older women.

Fenske also raised an issue that receives far less attention — how physicians are reimbursed for treating menopausal women.

“There is not much incentive for physicians to take care of menopausal women,” she told lawmakers.

Fenske said low insurance reimbursement makes it difficult for independent physicians to spend the necessary time with menopause patients. Large hospital networks may be better able to absorb those costs, she said, while smaller independent practices cannot.

Like the other witnesses, Fenske highlighted the lack of minimum standards for menopause education in medical residency programs.

Fenske offered lawmakers a striking comparison: OB-GYN residents are required to complete at least 200 vaginal deliveries, but there is no comparable minimum requirement for menopause education.  She called on Congress to push Medicare and the Departments of War and Veterans Affairs to make menopause education part of accreditation standards.

Black Box Warning Changes and Challenges

Menopause treatment has received renewed federal attention under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who announced in November 2025 that the FDA would begin removing its strongest “black box” warnings about cardiovascular disease, breast cancer and probable dementia from hormone replacement therapies, including estrogen. The first six revised labels were approved in February 2026, reflecting the administration’s position that overly broad warnings had discouraged women from seeking effective symptom relief. The change does not mean hormone therapy is risk-free: treatment remains an individual decision, with the FDA emphasizing initiation of systemic therapy before age 60 or within 10 years of menopause. The boxed warning about endometrial cancer remains for systemic estrogen-only products. On September 3, the FDA said it was working with manufacturers to increase estrogen patch supplies after rising demand made them harder to find.

Rhode Island No. 1 in U.S. Menopause Workplace Protections

On June 24, 2025, Gov. Dan McKee signed into law legislation (S 0361), introduced by Sen. Lori Urso (D-Dist. 8, Pawtucket), to support women experiencing menopause under the state’s fair employment statute—making Rhode Island the first state to enact such workplace protections explicitly. Rep. Karen Alzate (D-Dist. 60, Pawtucket, Central Falls) introduced a companion bill (H 6161), which passed by concurrence.

Rhode Island law already prohibits workplace discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, and related conditions. This includes requiring employers to provide reasonable accommodations and protecting individuals from being denied employment opportunities or promotions—or terminated—because of these conditions. The new law adds menopause to this list of protected health conditions.

“Menopause is a difficult and personal subject that has been stigmatized in this country,” said Sen. Urso in a statement announcing the bill’s passage. “But as something that affects half our population, it’s time we recognize it as a workforce issue—especially as our workforce ages along with our population. The current lack of protections contributes to inadequate retirement savings and lost leadership opportunities for women and poses an economic challenge for employers facing workforce shortages and the loss of experienced employees,” she says.

“Menopause is not something women choose to experience, and its effects on the mind and body can significantly impact daily life and job performance,” said Rep. Alzate. “Women should not have to risk being penalized or discriminated against at work due to a naturally occurring biological transition,” she says.

Rhode Island’s new law is paving the way for workplaces that actually support women experiencing menopause—and it sets a great example for the rest of the country to follow.

A Final Note…

For the millions of women now going through menopause — and the millions more who will follow them — the Sept. 16 hearing put an issue long discussed quietly in doctors’ offices and among women themselves squarely before Congress.

Whether the hearing ultimately results in more federal research, better physician training, and improved access to care will depend on what lawmakers do next. But after generations of silence, menopause finally received its first congressional hearing.

To read Scott and Gillibrand’s correspondence to GAO on the federal government’s role in Menopause research and education, go to Gillibrand Scott GAO Letter on Menopause

To watch the Sept. 16 Senate Aging Committee hearing, go to Half the Country, Zero Hearings: Meeting… | Senate Committee On Aging.

To read about RI’s new Menopause law, go to Rhode Island First in Nation to Add Workplace Protections for Women Experiencing Menopause – Herb Weiss

___

HHS Shake-Up Sends Shockwaves Through Aging Network

Published on April 31, 2025

Taking a page from President Donald J. Trump’s to “Make America Great Again,” last week the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a major restructuring of the federal agency to “Make America Healthy Again.” The dramatic restructuring in accordance with Trump’s Executive Order, “Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency’ Workforce Optimization Initiative.”

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), under management of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., last week announced a major restructuring and renaming of the federal agency under the initiative “Make America Healthy Again.” This dramatic reorganization follows Trump’s Executive Order, Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency’ Workforce Optimization Initiative.

“We aren’t just reducing bureaucratic sprawl. We are realigning the organization with its core mission and our new priorities in reversing the chronic disease epidemic,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in a statement announcing the massive overhaul. “This Department will do more—much more—at a lower cost to taxpayers.”

“Over time, bureaucracies like HHS become wasteful and inefficient, even when most of their staff are dedicated and competent civil servants,” Kennedy added. “This overhaul will be a win-win for taxpayers and those HHS serves. That’s the entire American public, because our goal is to Make America Healthy Again.”

During the Biden administration, HHS’s budget increased by 38%, and its staffing grew by 17%, prompting the new HHS chief to place the federal agency on the budgetary chopping block.

According to HHS, this restructuring will not impact critical services while saving taxpayers $1.8 billion per year through a reduction of approximately 10,000 full-time employees. When combined with other cost-cutting initiatives, including early retirement, and the Fork in the Road program, the total downsizing will reduce HHS’s workforce from 82,000 to 62,000 employees.

HHS also plans to streamline departmental functions. Currently, the agency’s 28 divisions contain redundant units. Under the restructuring plan announced on March 27, 2025, these units will be consolidated into 15 new divisions, including a newly created Administration for a Healthy America (AHA). Additionally, core organizational functions—such as Human Resources, Information Technology, Procurement, External Affairs, and Policy—will be centralized. The number of regional offices will be cut from 10 to five.

As part of the restructuring, several agencies will see workforce reductions. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will cut approximately 3,500 full-time employees, focusing on streamlining operations and centralizing administrative functions, though HHS asserts these reductions will not affect drug, medical device, or food reviewers, nor inspectors.

Similarly, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will downsize by approximately 2,400 employees, refocusing its efforts on epidemic and outbreak response. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) will eliminate 1,200 positions by centralizing procurement, human resources, and communications across its 27 institutes and centers. Meanwhile, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will cut around 300 positions, targeting minor duplication within the agency. HHS insists these changes will not impact Medicare or Medicaid services, but improve them.

Restructuring HHS to Focus on Chronic Illness Prevention

HHS’s overhaul aligns with the agency’s new priority of ending America’s chronic illness epidemic by focusing resources on ensuring safe, wholesome food, clean water, and the elimination of environmental toxins.

The Administration for a Healthy America (AHA) will consolidate five agencies—the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, the Health Resources and Services Administration, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health—into a single entity. This unification aims to enhance health resource coordination for low-income Americans, emphasizing primary care, maternal and child health, mental health, environmental health, HIV/AIDS, and workforce development.

Additionally, the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, responsible for national disaster and public health emergency response, will be transferred to the CDC to strengthen its core mission of protecting Americans from health threats.

To combat waste, fraud, and abuse, HHS will create a new Assistant Secretary for Enforcement, overseeing the Departmental Appeals Board, the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals, and the Office for Civil Rights.

Furthermore, HHS will merge the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to form the Office of Strategy, enhancing research to inform policy decisions.
Critical programs under the Administration for Community Living (ACL), which supports older adults and people with disabilities, will be integrated into other HHS agencies, including the Administration for Children and Families, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). HHS assures that these changes will not impact Medicare or Medicaid services.

Sounding the Alarm

Following the announcement of HHS’s restructuring plans, which would broad without a lot of detail, aging advocacy groups quickly released statements to voice strong concerns.

“For decades, the federal health programs that retirees and people with disabilities depend on have been ably administered under both Democratic and Republican administrations. However, the radical cutbacks proposed by the Trump administration place the delivery of these programs in jeopardy,” warned Dan Adcock, Director of Government Relations & Policy at the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare (NCPSSM).

Adcock also noted that HHS plans to eliminate the ALC and divide its responsibilities between two offices with no prior experience in this area. “This administration has already demonstrated a reckless disregard for public interests in favor of slashing operations and staff under the guise of ‘efficiency,’” he added. “So far, all they have done is create chaos and confusion, disrupting essential programs for seniors and the disabled. We view Secretary Kennedy’s plans with alarm.”

Nancy LeaMond, Executive Vice President and Chief Advocacy and Engagement Officer at AARP, also urged HHS to prioritize older Americans’ health needs. “HHS must ensure access to senior centers, community health centers, nutritious meals, Medicare assistance, and other vital services that countless older Americans rely on. Health is central to the lives, well-being, and financial security of AARP’s members and the more than 100 million Americans over age 50,” she emphasized.

Terry Fulmer, PhD, RN, FAAN, President of the John A. Hartford Foundation, echoed these concerns. “The announcement of workforce cuts at HHS comes at a time of unprecedented growth in America’s aging population. The proposed reorganization of ACL and its integration into other agencies requires careful consideration.”

Fulmer stressed that ACL administers programs essential to older adults’ daily lives, such as meal delivery, transportation to medical appointments, and chronic disease management. Absorbing these functions with far fewer staff demands careful planning. The government’s commitment to older adults requires a cautious approach, she said.

The Center for Medicare Advocacy also expressed deep concerns, particularly regarding plans to restructure ACL and consolidate oversight of Medicare appeals. “Given what we have seen with Social Security Administration cuts and restructuring, HHS’s claim that these changes won’t impact critical services rings hollow,” said Co-Director David Lipschutz.

LeadingAge, a national association representing nonprofit aging services providers, called for HHS to ensure older adults and their caregivers are not overlooked. “Cutting staff responsible for critical agency functions raises serious concerns. How will the work our members rely on get done? How will this impact quality care for older adults?” asked President and CEO Katie Smith Sloan.

Sloan also cautioned that reducing HHS’s field offices from 10 to five could impact CMS’s ability to oversee nursing home surveys and provider compliance. “A 25% workforce reduction must be undertaken with extreme care—especially given the millions of older adults who depend on these services,” she emphasized.

For a fact sheet on the HHS restructuring, visit https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/hhs-restructuring-doge-fact-sheet.html

A close look on “Facts and Figures” about Alzheimer’s

Published in RINewsToday on April 3, 2023

For over five years, Janet Bryant, 65, has been a caregiver for her 67-year-old husband, Paul, who suffers from Alzheimer’s disease. Their daughter, Alison, and husband Ryan, living in the condo above her parents, step in to assist with caregiver duties when needed. 

“It’s often a long day when you’re caring for someone with dementia,” says Janet, who handles all financial, medical and household tasks. Even when Paul helps out with a few tasks he must be closely supervised, she says. And you must be watchful. “A few weeks ago, Paul was trying to make a cup of tea, and put the metal tea kettle in the microwave, causing the handle to burst into flames. I disabled the microwave and now I make him his tea. His wife of 47 years says he can’t be left alone, and gets lost in their small condo. 

Janet acknowledges that the long day often continues into night, as Paul has trouble finding the bathroom or tries to roam around. 

Janet’s experiences as a caregiver taking care of a loved one with Alzheimer’s disease is not uncommon. The newly released Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures reports that 6.7 million people aged 65 and over, like Paul, are living with Alzheimer’s or other dementias in the United States — it’s one of the costliest conditions to society and is projected to reach $345 billion, a $24 billion increase from a year ago. By 2050 these costs could rise to nearly $1 trillion.

In 2022, like Janet, more than 11 million caregivers provided unpaid care for people with Alzheimer’s or other dementias, providing an estimated 18 billion hours of unpaid assistance — a contribution valued at $339.5 billion, noted Facts and Figures.

Taking a look at Facts and Figures

The Alzheimer’s Association’s 2023 Facts and Figures report (the first released in 2007) provides an in-depth look at the latest national and state-by-state statistics on Alzheimer’s disease prevalence, mortality, caregiving, dementia care workforce and costs of care. 

Alzheimer’s disease is not a normal part of aging; it’s a devastating cognitive disorder that will be the number 1 killer by 2050. This year’s Fact and Figures findings indicate that 1 in 3 seniors dies with Alzheimer’s or another dementia. This devastating disorder also kills more than breast cancer and prostate cancer, combined. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from heart disease have decreased by 7.3% while deaths from Alzheimer’s disease have increased by 145%.  

Researchers found that while only 4 in 10 Americans talk to their physician right away when experiencing early memory or cognitive loss, 7 in 10 would want to know if they have Alzheimer’s disease if it could allow for earlier medical treatment. 

This year’s report also examines the capacity of the medical specialty workforce essential for diagnosis, treatment and ongoing care for people living with Alzheimer’s and all other types of dementia. The shortage of dementia care specialists could soon become a crisis for Alzheimer’s disease care, warn the researchers, especially with the recent FDA accelerated approval of new treatments targeting the underlying biology of Alzheimer’s disease, which is reframing the health care landscape for people with early-stage Alzheimer’s or MCI due to Alzheimer’s disease.

Caring for those living with Alzheimer’s or other dementias poses special challenges, the report noted. As dementia symptoms worsen, caregivers can experience increased emotional stress (59%), depression, anxiety, chronic stress, and new or exacerbated health problems. Additionally, caregivers often experience depleted income and finances due to disruptions in employment, and paying for health care or other services for both themselves and those with dementia.

While recent advancements in treatment of early-stage Alzheimer’s, including mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer’s disease, are providing hope to millions living with memory loss and early cognitive decline, the latest Fact and Figures finds too often individuals with memory concerns, and their doctors, are not discussing the issue, missing a critical first step toward diagnosis and potential treatment.

“Providing the best possible care for Alzheimer’s disease requires conversations about memory at the earliest point of concern and a knowledgeable, accessible care team that includes physician specialists to diagnose, monitor disease progression, and treat when appropriate,” said Maria C. Carrillo, Ph.D., chief science officer of the Alzheimer’s Association, in a statement announcing the release of the 128-page report.

“For the first time in nearly two decades, there is a class of treatments emerging to treat early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. It’s more important than ever for individuals to act quickly if they have memory concerns or experience symptoms.”

An accompanying special report, The Patient Journey in an Era of New Treatments, offers new insights from patients and primary care physicians (PCPs) on current barriers that impede earlier discussion of cognitive concerns. Focus groups reveal many people with subjective cognitive decline (self-reported memory concerns) do not discuss cognitive symptoms with their health care providers. Previous special reports have indicated many people believe their experiences are related to normal aging, rather than a potential diagnosable medical condition.

Taking a close look at Rhode Island

The number of people aged 65 and over with Alzheimer’s and other dementia continues to increase in Rhode Island, from 24,000 in 2020, and expected to climb to 27,000 by 2025.  That’s an estimated 12.5% increase.  Fifty-two percent of Rhode Island caregivers report having one chronic condition, 41% say they are depressed and 11% rate their health as poor. 

Currently there are 36,000 unpaid caregivers in the Ocean State providing about 51 million total hours of uncompensated care (valued at over $1.29 million).  

The cost of health care continues to skyrocket to care for those with Alzheimer’s and other dementias.  The state’s Medicaid program spends over $470 million, with the projected cost to increase by 20.1% by 2025. 

Two years ago, there were 33 practicing Geriatricians in Rhode Island. By 2050, a 48.5% increase of this medical specialty will be needed to meet the patient care demands. Three years ago, there were 7,410 Health and Personal Care Aides providing care. By 2030, an increase of direct care workers by 27.5% will be needed to provide personal care. 

Implications for Rhode Island lawmakers, state officials

Donna McGowan Executive Director of the RI Chapter of the Alzheimer’s Association expects the release of the latest Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures to educate state policy makers about the impact of Alzheimer’s on their own communities and districts, specifically the number of Rhode Islanders living with Alzheimer’s or related dementia, and the number of caregivers who provide for them. 

“Further, along with personal discussions, the report will help them to understand the reality that many of their constituents are hesitant to seek a medical diagnosis, or even support it. And the report will highlight for policy makers the crisis that is the shortage of workers in the Alzheimer’s and related dementia professional caregiving field,” notes McGowan.

As the 2023 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures indicates, a growing number of caregivers have approached the Rhode Island chapter to access programs and services, says McGowan. Last fiscal year, approximately 4,600 individuals contacted the Rhode Island chapter to access programs and services which equated to an “8% overall increase over the previous fiscal year,” she said.  

According to McGowan, this year they are tracking approximately a 16% increase in individuals contacting their helpline, totaling approximately 5,336 individuals accessing programs and services. 

“With the report showing we may not have sufficient specialist capacity to deal with the projected increase in Rhode Islanders with ADRD, there is a critical need to provide Rhode Island primary care practices with the training needed to care for persons with dementia and their caregivers,” says Maureen Maigret, Policy Advisor for Senior Agenda Coalition of RI (SACRI), who also serves on the state’s Advisory Council on Alzheimer’s Disease and Care and a member of The Care Transformation Collaborative (CTC).  Fortunately, the CTC, in partnership with the Rhode Island Department of Health, is offering such training now through the state’s Geriatric Education Center. 

“And with a projected need for close to a 30% increase in home health aides and personal care attendants, the workforce shortage will worsen dramatically if we fail to increase direct care staff wages and expand training staff to care for persons with ADRD,” warns Maigret, noting that this is why SACRI is advocating for funding to increase direct care staff wages to a minimum of $20 an hour. 

“As the prevalence of people living with dementia continues to increase in Rhode Island, the health system and long-term care continuum will be challenged by the findings highlighted in this report,” says Nancy Sutton, MS, RD, the Rhode Island Health Department’s (RIDOH) Chief, Center for Chronic Care and Disease Management. “RIDOH, the Rhode Island Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Advisory Council, and our many partners are committed to continuing efforts to educate the public on the importance of speaking to a healthcare provider about memory concerns, she said.

Sutton says, “with the support of federal funding, resources such as a Brain Health Toolkit are being developed to support health system partners in their engagement in conversation with patients and caregivers about the importance of early detection and navigating complex systems of care and community resources to support people living with dementia.”

“We know that age is a big risk factor for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related types of Dementia (ADRD),” said the RI Office of Healthy Aging (OHA) Director Maria Cimini. “As Rhode Islanders age if they or their caregivers are concerned about memory loss, we encourage them to talk to their physicians and get connected to resources through the Point, 401-462-4444 or through myoptionsri.gov to help navigate this journey.” 

At OHA, we have worked to build comfort and capacity among physicians through a recent Alzheimer’s Disease Programs Initiative (ADPI) grant with the focus of expanding the Dementia-Capable Home and Community Based Services which include outreach and education of primary care/direct service providers in identification, diagnosis, referral, and care planning process for ADRD and to provide services supportive of individuals living with dementia and their family caregivers within the statewide Aging and Disability Resource Center. OHA and its partners developed a provider resource tool to assist providers with referring patients with cognitive symptoms and family caregivers to services; and it also provides guidance to providers in conducting care planning, and billing for dementia-related services. That resource can be found here: https://oha.ri.gov/resources/oha-resource-center.

For a copy of the 2023 Alzheimer’s Disease Fact and Figures, go to: https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/facts-figures.

For a copy of the accompanying special report, The Patient Journey in an Era of New Treatments, to https://www.alz.org/media/Documents/alzheimers-facts-and-figures-special-report.pdf.

The Alzheimer’s Association’s  24/7 Helpline clinicians guide callers to financial assistance programs that may help pay for respite or a needed break. Caregivers will also find programs and services offered by this organization, too. For details, go to https://www.alz.org/ri.