Published in Blackstone Valley Call & Times on October 6, 2026
Democratic gubernatorial candidate Helena Buonanno Foulkes and independent candidate Ken Block squared off Friday, Oct. 2, at a gubernatorial candidate forum focused on issues affecting older Rhode Islanders, people with disabilities, family caregivers and those receiving behavioral health services.
Opening the forum, Carol Anne Costa, SACRI’s Executive Director, noted that Republican candidate Aaron Guckian, who had committed to attend, failed to show up after notifying organizers at 3 p.m. that same day. “We’ve adjusted the program, and we will move forward in a focused and streamlined way so that these candidates who have taken the time to be with this audience get the forum they deserve,” she said.
Introducing the Candidates
Foulkes, 62, a Providence resident, emphasized her 25 years at CVS, ultimately becoming president of CVS Pharmacy, where she worked on employment initiatives for people with disabilities and special needs. She said she doesn’t need to be “the smartest person in the room,” but wants to leverage community expertise. She highlighted her relationships with other governors, including Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, as sources of policy ideas. Her policy priorities include housing affordability and healthcare access, and she called for creating a “whole-of-government” approach to senior services.
Block, 60, a Barrington software engineer who founded Simpatico Software Systems, political reformer and author, is an independent candidate who describes himself as an “operational manager” with experience helping large multinational companies reimagine their business operations, contracting and delivery of complicated computer systems. He emphasizes a data-driven approach to problem-solving and decision-making and has firsthand experience with healthcare and aging issues as a caregiver for his mother, who had early-onset Alzheimer’s, and helping his in-laws with aging-in-place challenges.
Block, like Foulkes, has actively sought information from advocacy groups on aging and disability issues throughout his campaign. He focuses heavily on government efficiency, transparency and fixing “friction points” in state operations.
The forum, held at Rhodes on the Pawtuxet in Cranston, was sponsored by the Senior Agenda Coalition of Rhode Island (SACRI), AccessPoint Rhode Island and the Mental Health Association of Rhode Island.
Unlike many gubernatorial forums held throughout the Ocean State that focus heavily on taxes, housing, education and the economy, SACRI’s forum allowed the candidates to address issues that often receive less attention during political campaigns: aging in the community, long-term services and supports, nursing home care, Medicaid, family caregiving, behavioral health and services for persons with disabilities.
Spanning more than an hour, the two candidates fielded questions on strengthening the state’s Office of Healthy Aging, creating a multi-sector plan on aging, establishing a state advocate’s office and expanding long-term care. They also discussed unpaid family caregivers, workforce shortages, accessible housing, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, economic security for older adults and transparency in human services.
Where They Stand
During opening remarks, Foulkes emphasized that seniors are an “untapped resource” of wisdom and expertise. She proposed creating a “senior corps”-style effort and intergenerational mentoring programs. Block shared personal caregiving experiences involving his parents and now his in-laws in their 80s, stressing the importance of advocacy organizations in helping families find needed resources and support.
At that point, the two candidates addressed a multitude of topics during the forum. Here is a sampling.
The SACRI forum highlighted that Rhode Island’s 2009 law setting a 50% goal for Medicaid home and community-based services remains unmet, with general home and community services reaching only 20.1%. The state ranks 44th nationally in community support spending for older adults at $28 per adult age 60 and older, compared with the $53 U.S. average and $222 in Massachusetts.
Regarding long-term care, Block called for cost-effective alternatives to nursing homes for residents with lower care needs, including housing options. He also recognized the possibility of severe budget pressures, including potential Medicaid cuts.
Foulkes highlighted the staffing crisis, fueled by low wages and lack of health insurance for many home-care workers. She also raised concerns about the impact of federal immigration policies on the pool of workers available to provide care.
The candidates were asked about a long-term care workforce crisis that includes 512 nursing assistant openings and only 132 trained applicants; Medicaid reimbursement rates; support for unpaid family caregivers who provide an estimated $2.8 billion in annual care; and the need for accessible housing throughout Rhode Island, with only 85 of 2,194 units under development being handicapped accessible.
Block supported elevating the state’s Office of Healthy Aging (OHA) to a cabinet-level position to ensure seniors have a direct voice to the governor. His rationale: A substantial portion of the Ocean State’s population has interests that align directly with OHA.
Foulkes advocates for a “whole-of-government approach” to providing senior services, with a potential cabinet-level position for aging, looking to Maryland as a model.
Foulkes emphasized the need for creating a master plan on aging with accountability and deadlines. Block also pledged to either issue an executive order or support legislation to develop the state’s aging policies, programs and services.
The candidates split on how to provide sustainable funding for the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. Rhode Island’s 988 system has handled nearly 75,000 calls since its launch while maintaining a 98% answer rate.
Block explained his opposition to using a telephone fee to fund the program, citing the regressive burden such fees place on low-income residents. He has no opposition to the program itself. Foulkes supported a small monthly telephone fee, similar to 911 funding, to provide a dedicated funding source for the state’s 988 response system.
Both candidates emphasized government inefficiency and data-access problems. Block described himself as “an operational manager” who specializes in “understanding where an organization doesn’t work well” and called Rhode Island government “a target rich environment.”
He expressed frustration with “Rhode Island state government’s ability to provide data” and promised “dashboards and other things that will ultimately really let us understand much better than we can now where we’re spending the money.”
Foulkes similarly stated, “we need way more transparency everywhere in the state” and endorsed the Inspector General concept to track how government funds are spent.
Direct-care workforce challenges appeared across multiple questions. Foulkes identified “the gap in terms of the number of community healthcare workers” and how “low paid” the work is, noting that “most of them that I speak to don’t even have healthcare insurance themselves.”
Foulkes connected federal immigration policy to the state’s capacity to provide care, raising concerns about home-care providers and healthcare workers who are immigrants. Block pointed again to the nursing assistant shortage during the lightning round.
Foulkes proposed creating a state website to assist families in navigating the long-term care continuum, acknowledging “it’s really hard right now” to find appropriate services. She also called for helping Rhode Islanders at risk of losing Medicaid coverage, proposing a “Medicaid navigator system” using faith-based communities and senior centers to help people complete eligibility paperwork.
Both candidates warned about the severe stress on Rhode Island’s healthcare system. Block noted that Roger Williams Medical Center and Our Lady of Fatima Hospital were “on life support,” stressing their importance to the state’s healthcare system. Foulkes pointed to Rhode Island’s more than $156 million first-year federal Rural Health Transformation Program award as an opportunity to strengthen healthcare delivery.
Foulkes and Block also supported creating a dementia services coordinator position at the Department of Health. They supported continuing the overdose task force’s progress and having dedicated substance-use and mental-health policy staff in the governor’s office.
Finally, in lightning-round responses, both candidates supported continuing Medicaid reimbursement rate efforts for direct-care staff; using 30% of state housing bond funds for accessible housing for older adults and people with disabilities; creating an Office of the Elder Advocate; and developing a multi-sector plan on aging.
While Foulkes supports eliminating the Medicare Savings Program asset limit and providing an annual cost-of-living adjustment to the state’s SSI supplemental payment, Block gave no answer because he did not have a cost estimate.
Here’s the Bottom Line
With federal funding uncertainty, the state’s ongoing structural budget deficit and fiscal limitations, will Foulkes and Block be able to make good on their policy commitments?
Block repeatedly declined to make specific funding promises on a number of policies, stating, “I don’t know what’s coming at us” and “my answer to you, with all sincere respect, is I just don’t know.”
Foulkes also acknowledged Block’s concerns about reduced federal funding and the fiscal limitations facing the next governor. “I need to understand at the end of the day what all of this costs and make sure that I’m not making promises to you that I can’t keep,” she said.
For older Rhode Islanders, people with disabilities and behavioral health issues, family caregivers and the organizations that serve them, that may ultimately be the most important question coming out of SACRI’s forum: not just what the candidates promise to do, but whether the next governor will have the resources and political will to do it.
Stay tuned.
Tag Archives for OHA
Older Adults Play Key Role as Volunteers in Their Communities
Published in RINewsToday on September 14, 2026
Being a volunteer can be good for your health and mental well-being, but AARP Foundation’s newly released analysis sheds light on another positive. People age 50 and older contribute more than half — 55% — of all volunteer hours, adding approximately $92.2 billion annually to the nation’s economy.
As the nation marked the 9/11 Day of Service and Remembrance (a day every year that thousands of people and organizations nationwide volunteer and “do good” in recognition of 9/11), the latest analysis of the U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Survey Civic Engagement and Volunteering Supplement helps us to better understand how older Americans contribute as volunteers and participate in the nation’s civic life.
The data show that older volunteers help build the social fabric of their communities while providing critical support to organizations working to meet their missions and operational needs.
The findings, detailed in “Older Adult Volunteers: A Pillar of Community and Civic Life,” show that older adults do not just volunteer in large numbers. They also show up consistently and contribute more time, providing the reliable support that schools, nonprofits, and caregiving networks depend on.
The eight-page analysis also casts doubt on the idea that volunteering is mainly limited to retirement; it shows that adults aged 50 to 64 volunteer at rates similar to those of adults aged 65 and older.
The analysis also questions the idea that volunteering is mostly limited to retirement years; it shows that the rate at which adults aged 50 to 64 volunteer is similar to that of adults who are 65 years of age and over.
“Older adults are an extraordinary force for good in our communities,” said AARP Foundation President Claire Casey in a Sept. 10 statement announcing the study’s results. “They put a lifetime of skills and experience to work for others, benefiting all of us by making our neighborhoods and communities stronger and more connected.”
According to the AARP Foundation, older adults contribute substantially to volunteerism because they volunteer in greater numbers and spend more time volunteering. While adults age 50 and older make up just 36% of the U.S. population, they account for 44% of the nation’s volunteers.
They also contribute an average of 89 volunteer hours annually, compared with 56 hours among volunteers under age 50 — 33 additional hours each year. Nearly three-quarters (73%) volunteer at least once a month, compared with 63% of younger volunteers.
Volunteerism Enhances Civic Participation
Adults age 50 and older who volunteer are more likely than the overall 50-plus population to vote (79% compared with 61%) and to belong to civic groups or associations (67% compared with 29%).
Older volunteers also tend to stay connected with their neighbors, families and friends. More than 37% regularly discuss politics with neighbors, and 71% do so with family or friends. Sixty-seven percent follow the news daily.
The analysis also found that 90% of volunteers age 50 and older socialize with their neighbors (compared to 77% overall), and 80% do so at least once a month. Fifty-seven percent regularly do favors for their neighbors, compared with 41% overall.
The findings show that older adults who volunteer are not just giving their time to organizations and helping their neighbors. Many are also staying involved in the civic life of their communities.
Volunteerism’s Impact on Health and Well-Being
Research also shows that volunteering may benefit older adults’ health.
A 2013 Carnegie Mellon University study found that older adults who volunteered at least 200 hours per year were 40% less likely to develop hypertension, or high blood pressure, than those who did not volunteer when evaluated four years later.
For the study, researchers followed 1,164 adults ages 51 to 91 from across the nation. All had normal blood pressure when first interviewed in 2006. When researchers interviewed them again four years later, they found that the specific type of volunteer activity did not matter. The amount of time spent volunteering did, with 40% less likely to develop high blood pressure.
“As people get older, social transitions like retirement, bereavement and the departure of children from the home often leave older adults with fewer natural opportunities for social interaction,” said lead researcher Rodlescia S. Sneed in a statement releasing the findings of this study. She noted that volunteering may provide older adults with social connections they might not otherwise have
More recent research suggests that helping others may also slow cognitive decline.
A study reported on ScienceDaily’s website in December of 2025 found that helping others just a few hours each week may slow brain aging. Researchers from the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Massachusetts Boston followed more than 30,000 U.S. adults over two decades.
The researchers found that people who consistently helped others outside their household experienced a 15% to 20% slower rate of age-related cognitive decline. The benefits were found both among those who formally volunteered and those who helped informally, such as giving someone a ride to a medical appointment, watching children, or doing lawn work for a neighbor, relative, or friend.
The strongest and most consistent benefit was found among those who spent about two to four hours per week helping others.
“Everyday acts of support — whether organized or personal — can have lasting cognitive impact,” said Sae Hwang Han, an assistant professor of human development and family sciences at the University of Texas at Austin who led the study.
Han noted that the cognitive benefits were not just short-term, but accumulated over time with continued involvement. The benefits were also found with both formal volunteering and informal helping.
“Informal helping is sometimes assumed to offer fewer health benefits due to its lack of social recognition,” Han said. “It was a pleasant surprise to find that it provides cognitive benefits comparable to formal volunteering.”
Finding Volunteer Opportunities in Rhode Island
According to the state’s Office of Healthy Aging (OHA), about 65,000 volunteers age 55 and older in Rhode Island contribute $149 million in services statewide.
To learn more about opportunities, older Rhode Islanders can find opportunities across the state on OHA’s online volunteer resource page. Go to Volunteer | Office of Healthy Aging.
___
Medicare Fraud Prevention Week Puts Focus on Protecting Seniors from Scams
Published in RINewsToday on June 8, 2026
As skyrocketing Medicare fraud schemes cost taxpayers billions each year, congressional leaders, federal agencies, and consumer advocacy groups intensify their efforts to combat aggressive scams targeting older Americans.
Experts estimate that Medicare fraud, waste, and abuse may cost as much as $60 billion annually. However, no federal agency publishes a definitive total amount because much of the activity goes undetected.
The growing incidents of Medicare fraud, waste, and abuse framed the discussion on June 3, 2026, at the Leon Mathieu Senior Center in Pawtucket, where more than 40 older adults gathered for the Fifth Annual Medicare Fraud Prevention Week event.
During the 75-minute presentation, three federal officials shared valuable information with the attending Medicare beneficiaries, designed to increase their awareness of fraud tactics and equip them with practical strategies to safeguard their personal and health care benefits.
The afternoon program was hosted by Rhode Island’s Senior Medicare Patrol (SMP), along with special agents from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and the City of Pawtucket.
At the gathering, municipal, state, and federal leaders warned that Medicare recipients remain primary targets of fraudsters who use fake medical claims and identity theft. Specific types of fraud were highlighted, including durable medical equipment (orthotic braces, urinary catheters), genetic testing, and fraudulent billing by medical providers.
Learning to Spot the Warning Signs
Christine Anderson, Health Information Manager at the Rhode Island Office of Healthy Aging (OHA) and the leader of the state’s SMP program, said the program’s goal is to provide beneficiaries with practical tools to protect themselves and encourage them to be more proactive in reporting suspicious fraud activity, potentially reducing the success rate of scams within Rhode Island.
Anderson emphasized that scammers will often pose as representatives of Medicare, Social Security, or local human services offices to obtain or confirm Medicare numbers, which can be used to bill for unnecessary durable medical equipment such as back or knee braces.
SMP’s Program Manager urged attendees to review their Medicare Summary Notices (for Original Medicare) or their Explanation of Medical Benefits (EOMB), and to seek assistance from the SMP program and the Leon Mathieu Senior Center (or their local senior center) if they see unfamiliar charges.
“If something doesn’t look right, ask questions,” Anderson urged.
“We are grateful to the OHA, HHS-OIG, CMS, and the SMP for bringing this important information directly to our residents,” Donald R. Grebien, Mayor of Pawtucket said. “Education and awareness are critical in protecting older adults and preserving the integrity of the Medicare system.” It is one of the strongest defenses against scams targeting older residents,’ he says. Grebien pointed out that fraud can threaten both the financial security and well-being of seniors.
Echoing Grebien’s sentiment, Elizabeth Moreira, Pawtucket’s Deputy Director of Administration, said community education is key, stressing that awareness of the growing prevalence of scams is one of our strongest tools for preventing fraud. “Events like today give our community and caregivers the tools they need to recognize warning signs, protect their personal information, and report fraud before it can harm them,” Moreira said.
Federal Enforcement Efforts
HHS-OIG Special Agent Victoria Mens and Assistant Special Agent Lindsay Walford described their federal agency’s role in investigating fraud, waste, and abuse across more than 100 HHS programs, including health, social, and Medicare and Medicaid programs.
The federal agents also explained how they fight Medicare fraud, waste, and abuse.
They highlighted how the Office of Audit Services and the Office of Evaluation and Inspections publish reports on systemic problems including nursing homes lacking emergency power and using antipsychotic drugs to control residents.
To safeguard $2 trillion in federal healthcare funds, HHS-OIG conducts audits, evaluations, and criminal investigations.
The federal officials also cited prosecutions involving overbilling for medical equipment, large-scale catheter fraud schemes, and psychiatric billing for services that were never provided.
One of the most costly schemes involving urinary catheters was estimated to have resulted in attempted losses of about $4.5 billion, notes Walford.
During the presentation, Walford cited a Rhode Island case. She noted that Zynex Medical allegedly overbilled multiple payers about $873 million for TENS units and excessive supplies, leading to criminal charges against company leaders and a non-prosecution agreement with the company.
“A lot of that has been stopped, and so that money hasn’t all gone out, but that’s the tune and counting as to how much they’re attempting to pull out of the Medicare Trust Fund,” Walford said. She gave an overview of HHS-OIG accomplishments. Between April and September 2025, OIG work led to $2.2 billion in recoveries through settlements and criminal restitution. The agency said it returns nearly $13 for every dollar spent on oversight.
During the same period, investigators completed more than 900 investigations and issued hundreds of recommendations to prevent improper payments, says Walford.
Protecting Yourself
Mens urged seniors to treat their Medicare number with the same care as a Social Security number. “Don’t give out that information,” she warns. “If someone calls claiming to be from Medicare or says they are your healthcare provider, hang up and call back using a number you know is legitimate,” she says.
“Scammers rely on urgency,” Mens said. “Take time to talk with a family member, Medicare representative, or healthcare professional before making any decisions,” she says.
Jennifer Syria, Regional Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, pointed out that beneficiaries play a critical role in preventing fraud. “When you review your statements and notice unfamiliar charges, you become a valuable investigator in preventing fraud,” Syria said.
Syria encouraged residents to report suspected fraud and have key details ready, including provider names, dates of service, payment amounts, and Medicare Summary Notices.
“If you suspect you are a victim of fraud, our trained staff can meet with you to help resolve the issue,” says Mary Lou Moran, Director of the Leon Mathieu Senior Center. If you need assistance, call 401-728-7582. Moran notes that protecting yourself comes down to three key actions: prevent, detect, and report.
For more details about Rhode Island’s Senior Medicare Patrol program, call (401) 1-888-884-8721.
