Category Archives for Elections

Gray Power Can Turn a Campaign Sour

Published in Senior Digest on October 2004

After 24 years on Smith Hill that included a 10-year stint as House speaker, John Harwood’s career came to a surprising end recently when 33-year-old former prosecutor J. Patrick O’Neill’s grass-roots campaign brought home the votes.  The lopsided victory, 758 votes for O’Neill to 352 for Harwood, propelled the political novice into the district 59 House seat.

Two years ago, Harwood barely kept his long-held House seat after a vigorous political campaign by write-in independent candidate Bruce Bayuk.  According to Joseph Fleming, of Fleming & Associates, a Cumberland-based polling and political consultant, seniors casting votes for Harwood at the polling place in Kennedy Manor on Broad Street, played a key role in his victory in that election cycle.

Fleming, who also serves as a political analyst for Channel 12 News said that senior voter support for Harwood was almost nonexistent in the recent Democratic primary.  Senior voters joined with anti-Harwood voters throughout the legislative district to give the former House speaker the boot.

“Harwood lost better than 2-to-1 at the polling place in Kennedy Manor,” Fleming said. “Seniors decided it was a time for a change.”

Over the years, political candidates have made pre-election day pilgrimages to Pawtucket’s senior high-rises.  In District 59, both Harwood and O’Neill courted voters in high-rises, providing food during meet and greet events.

“It’s a myth that a good meal at a senior high-rise will ultimately equate to a vote,” quips Fleming. “Seniors may go down to eat the food, but it doesn’t mean that you’ll get their vote.  Everyone feeds them, but they can’t vote for both sides.” Moreover, he said, the majority of older voters don’t reside in senior high rises.

“Seniors read campaign materials look at the campaign issues and vote for people who reflect their views on these issues,” Fleming says.

Darrell West, a Brown University professor and political pollster, notes that seniors are the biggest voting block in Rhode Island. “Not only are they a sizeable group in numbers, they also are more likely to exercise their franchise to vote,” he says.

Ken McGill, registrar for the City of Pawtucket, agrees with West’s assessment.  McGill says that in any election, political candidates can count on senior voters to turn out in high numbers.

“Seniors were brought up respecting the right to vote and how important it is. They know what is at stake and pay careful attention to the issues that not only affect them, but  issues impacting on members of their family, McGill says.

“Compared to young people, seniors are 30 to 40 percentage points more likely to vote, West said. “Seniors vote because they are invested in their community and come from a generation where it was considered any honor to vote,” says West.  He added that young people tend to be very cynical about politics and more likely to feel their vote does not matter.

West said that seniors voter as a bloc only when they see their issues directly at stake in an election. “If an election centers on Social Security or Medicare, they are more likely to overcome differences by gender, income and ethnicity and cast a ‘senior’ vote,” he says.

Adds Kathleen S. Connell, director of AARP-RI, “There are many reasons why candidates look to the senior citizens for votes. One of them being, the issues that affect the concerned seniors are the same issues that will also affect the candidates and their families now or in the future.”  Also, candidates know that seniors are the most reliable and informed voters, she says.

One of the questions surrounding the upcoming election is whether seniors will support the Rhode Island GOP in its efforts to increase the numbers in the General Assembly?

“Seniors lean Democratic because the elderly typically has seen democrats speak out most forcefully about the need to take care of seniors and protect Medicare and Social Security,” says West. However, Republicans have made in-roads with moral or ethical issues, he says.

Aging groups are gearing up for the upcoming November elections to send educated voting seniors to the polls, Connell says.

“This year, some of our volunteers are participating in presidential debate watches with Rhode Island College, and we are distributing voter guides for them to track the candidate responses to issues of importance to AARP members.  They can use these guides to further study the issues before going to the polls.”

Richard Bidwell, executive director of the Rhode Island Gray Panthers, also sees the value of getting educated senior voters to the polls. With the backdrop of the upcoming elections, the Senior Agenda Consortium (SAC), founded by the Gray Panthers and now comprised of 20 aging groups, is working to improve seniors’ knowledge of issues and develop strategies to pressure candidates to support SAC’s legislative agenda.

 As it did two years ago, SAC, which is funded by the Rhode Island Foundation, will organize three regional forums, to prod the candidates to support its legislation positions on issues ranging from ensuring access to low-cost prescription drugs, better funding for community long-term care services and protecting RIPTA bus routes.  The results will be released to the media.

AARP Works to Get the Vote Out

Published in the Pawtucket Times on October  21, 2002

AARP is flexing its political muscle.

While it’s not endorsing political candidates from either the Republican and Democratic ranks, one of the nation’s largest membership groups is moving swiftly to educate its members on key aging issues and directing  resources to get the vote out on Election Day.

AARP CEO Bill Novelli has begun the mobilization of his 35 million-plus members to hold all political candidates accountable in the upcoming elections. With the bipartisan gridlock that keeps a law from being enacted to lower skyrocketing drug costs and to provide drug coverage in Medicare, Novelli and his aging rank and file are just plan tired of promises. I can just imagine hearing him shout from AARP headquarters in Washington, D.C. “We are not going to take it anymore!”

This month, AARP begins to take steps to prod the political candidates to become more responsive to aging issues before Nov. 5 elections.

Over the next two weeks, AARP will begin a first-ever national voter education campaign on television. Aimed at voters age 50 and over, the advertising campaign’s get-out-the-vote message calls for the need of a Medicare drug benefit and the importance of Social Security to seniors.

On the issue of Social Security, the message says: “After all you’ve done to earn a paycheck, make sure some of it will be there when you retire. Know where the candidates stand on the future of Social Security and vote.”

Meanwhile, 50 candidate forums, like the one recently held in Warwick by AARP Rhode Island have already been held to enable older votes to directly question local candidates. AARP plans to hold an additional 20 events before Nov 5.

Here’s the rationale for AARP hosting the forums – seniors want detailed information and no longer want to learn about a candidate’s position and priorities in a 30-second sound bite or in a paragraph on a glossy campaign brochure.

Additionally, all congressional candidates will be asked to sign a new Medicare prescription pledge, promising that if they are elected, they will enact a benefit that is voluntary, stable and affordable in 2003.

A warning to the incoming politicians – keep your word. The names of candidates who do – and don’t- agree to sign this Medicare drug pledge will be made public, too.

More that 8.5 million AARP voter guides will be printed, detailing up-to-date information where candidates stand on senior issues. Localized election information on state and national races nationwide will also be made available on a comprehensive website  at http:/www.aarp.org/elections2002.

AARP will even fund Election Day polling, where voters in selected districts will be asked about the defining issues that influenced their votes. The results of this polling will signal to those  elected to Congress what priorities they will face when they begin their new terms in January 2003.

Finally, phone banks where an estimated 500,000 telephone calls will be made will assist AARP’s efforts to get out the vote on Election Day.

If AARP is successful in getting its political savvy and educated membership to the polls, political candidates had better listen to their concerns.

“Older voters participate in elections at a higher rate than any age group,” said AARP Director of Grassroots and Elections Kevin Donnellan, noting that the mid-term elections, where overall voter numbers are low, the percentage senior voting is higher.

Furthermore, Donnellan said in the 1998 mid-term elections, more than 60 percent of the voters were 45 and older. More than 70 percent of AARP members typically vote, he added.

AARP grassroots efforts might even become a factor in tight races, specifically deciding who goes to Washington and who stays at home, Donnellan says.

“Now that we are down to the wire to Election Day, AARP Rhode Island joins AARP nationally to urge Rhode Island seniors to demonstrate once again that they are the most dependable and consistent group of voters,” says Kathleen S. Connell, state director of AARP Rhode Island told All About Seniors.

“It is important that seniors exercise the power of the ballot box to convey the message that the time for action is now,” adds Connell.

The political fate of gubernatorial, congressional and state-wide candidates may well rest in the hands of AARP Rhode Island, which is now mobilizing its 125,000 members to get out and vote next month.

Combine the successful Senior Agenda/Election 2002 Project, recently spearheaded by the Gray Panthers of Rhode Island, working in collaboration with the Rhode Island Minority Elder Task Force, and hundreds of thousands of Ocean State seniors have become a knowledgeable and educated voter block.

Understanding the immediate and future needs of Rhode Island seniors may well become the ticket to statewide or national office inside the Capitol Beltway, when the dust settles after the  Nov. 5 election.

Read Between the Lines of Political Campaign Literature

Published in Pawtucket Times on September 9, 2002

Tomorrow’s primary election means time has now run out for gubernatorial state legislative and congressional candidates.

For the past several months, these political candidates attended hundreds of public events scattered throughout the Ocean State, bearing gifts of political stickers, bumper stickers and campaign literature at every stop they make.

No doubt you will agree that this election cycle was no different than any other one. Older Rhode Islanders were bombarded with campaign literature outlining candidates’ positions on specific senior issues.

During this year’s campaign, seniors repeatedly told political candidates to fix the problem of rising pharmaceutical costs. It was no surprise that one Democratic candidate told me at a recent fundraiser in Pawtucket’s Slater Park that the hot topic for seniors this year was the issue of costly pharmaceuticals, concerns he’d heard over and over again at coffees and events. This would be a primary issue his campaign would address, he assured.

But with complicated senior issues, like how to pay for costly pharmaceutical drugs, how can you get beyond the smoke and mirrors of political campaigns?

Here’s my advice – seniors must not believe everything they read. They must become savvy shoppers when reading a candidate’s position papers and/or campaign literature about their solutions to aging policy issues.

One must listen closely to the candidates, and more importantly, read between the lines.

For instance, Myrth York, calls for Rhode Island to negotiate tough deals with the pharmaceutical industry to reduce prices, insisting these companies should provide Rhode Island with the same discounts that they provide government agencies and federal programs.

Furthermore, she   goes on to say that Maine has created a similar program that other states across the country are starting to replicate.

“Good idea, but not applicable in the near future,” said Rep. Antonio Pires, who is running against the former state senator for governor in the Democratic primary.

“The pharmaceutical industry has tied that initiative up in the courts and the program is not in operation yet,” he told All About Seniors. While York’s idea may be a good one, can it get implemented quality?

Democrats gubernatorial candidates Pires, York and Attorney General Sheldon Whitehouse all call for the expansion of the state prescription drug program Rhode Island Pharmaceutical Assistance Program to Elders (RIPAE) to help older Rhode Islanders afford medication they need, via a Medicaid waiver to bring in federal dollars to pay for the expansion. This solution which everyone supports, sounds too good to be true.

Again, you must read between the lines.

Don’t expect this Medicaid waiver to materialize overnight, next week or even by next year. Some say that it will take some time to get this federal fix in place.

So, the quickest solution to lowering the cost of costly prescriptions drugs may well come at the federal rather than the state level, from Congress itself.

Political posturing about a particular party’s legislative proposal may look good in print, in a campaign ad or in a political commercial, but it won’t ultimately make prescription drugs cheaper in the near future.

The Democrat and Republican approach to providing seniors with prescription relief won’t gain the needed momentum for passage by Congress, so a bipartisan compromise is needed.

Now it’s on the shoulders of the Rhode Island delegation in Congress to work together to craft a meaningful compromise.

While the political candidates debate the pharmaceutical costs, they must not forget the other senior issues that must be addressed.

There is a need to being more assisted living facilities on line for moderate and low-income seniors. Don’t forget the need for affordable option for frail or low-income seniors.

Add to these housing issues the need to adequately fund a seamless continuum of long-term care services, from nursing facilities to community-based services. Adequate funding and resources must be allocated to state agencies to perform their legislative oversight responsibilities.

There must also be continued effort and energy directed by state policymakers to solve the state’s severe staffing shortage that continues to afflict both nursing facilities and home health agencies.

One lawmaker told me that the state budget deficit could well reach $ 250 billion. If true, this is not good news for those who want long-term solutions and not Band-Aid fixes to problems facing seniors.

Be a savvy shopper when you are reviewing the piles of campaign literature dropped at your door. It may look pleasing to the eye, but a severe budget deficit may ultimately make that promise just pie in the sky.