Retirees reflect on financial fragility of retirement

Published in RINewsToday on December 9, 2024

Literally just hot off the press… the Los Angeles, California-based nonprofit Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies^® (TCRS) in collaboration with Transamerica Institute^®, released the findings of its 24 Annual Transamerica Retirement survey. Considered to be one of the largest and longest running annual surveys of its kind, its findings paint a picture of being retired in America.

Retiree life in the post-pandemic economy examines the health and well-being, personal finances, and retirement security of U.S. retirees no longer working. The report’s analysis was prepared by the research team at Transamerica Institute and TCRS. The 25-minute online survey was conducted within the U.S. by The Harris Poll on behalf of Transamerica Institute between September 14 and October 23, 2023, among a nationally representative sample of 10,002 people, including a subsample of 2,404 retirees who are retired and do not work.

Shedding light on the many facets of retirement

According to TCRS’s retirement survey, released on Nov. 26th, fewer than one in four retirees (23%) say they are very confident and able to maintain a comfortable lifestyle throughout their retirement.

“Retirement brings freedom and time for personal pursuits,” said Catherine Collinson, CEO and president of Transamerica Institute and TCRS in a statement announcing the release of the 76-page report. “However, retirees are living on a fixed income with limited financial resources. Many would be unable to withstand a major financial shock, such as the need to pay for long-term care. Retirees’ fragile financial situation serves as a cautionary tale that underscores the imperative for strengthening our retirement system,” she says.

“Many retirees may wonder what they could have done differently to save and plan for retirement, and many may feel they have done everything right but still came up short,” adds Collinson. “In reality, over their working careers, the world has changed, the retirement landscape has evolved, and the need to self-fund a greater portion of one’s retirement income has intensified,” she said.

Based on the report’s findings, retirees are active and engaged in meaningful ways. As retirees, they are:

· spending more time with family and friends (58%)

· pursuing hobbies (43%)

· traveling (36%)

· taking care of their grandchildren (19%)

· doing volunteer work (16%)

· caregiving (10%)

Although most retirees express a positive feeling about life, others say they are distressed. Most retirees say they are:

· generally happy (89%)

· have close relationships with family and friends (88%)

· enjoying life (86%)

· have a positive view of aging (79%)

· have a strong sense of purpose (79%)

· have an active social life (53%)

However, three in 10 retirees (30%) have financial trouble in making ends meet, 27% indicate they often feel unmotivated and overwhelmed, 24% often feel anxious and depressed, and 17% are isolated and lonely.

Retirees who retired before the age of 65 are cutting short their working years and income, a situation that could inevitably lead to a decrease in their retirement income. Almost six in 10 retirees say they retired sooner than planned (58%) and, among them, almost half did so for personal health-related reasons (46%) and employment-related issues (43%), while 20% did so for family-related reasons. Only one in five (21%) retired early because they were financially able.

Retirees are struggling to juggle competing financial priorities and debt, the findings indicate. Retirees’ say their current top financial priorities include

· building emergency savings (31%)

· just getting by to cover basic living expenses (29%)

· continuing to save for retirement (24%)

· paying off one or more forms of debt as a current financial priority (45%)

o paying off credit cards (30%), paying off mortgages (20%), paying off other consumer debt (10%), and paying off student loans (3%).

The survey found that the retiree’s greatest retirement fears centered around money and health issues. Forty-two percent expressed fear that Social Security will be reduced or may cease to exist in the future. Almost six in 10 retirees (58%) expect Social Security to be their primary source of income throughout their retirement, reinforcing their view that the retirement program is the cornerstone of their retirement income.

Retiring before age 65 impacts your Social Security benefit. Retirees currently receiving Social Security started at age 63 (median) which translates to a lower monthly benefit than if they had waited until their full retirement age of 66 or 67, depending on the year they were born. Only 4% of retirees waited until age 70 or later which would have maximized their monthly benefit, noted the report.

Additionally, the retirees fear declining health that requires long-term care (37%), losing their independence (32%), outliving their savings and investments (32%), and cognitive decline, dementia, or Alzheimer’s (28%).

Fear of unanticipated costly long-term care

Only 13% of retirees are very confident they would be able to afford long-term care, if needed – and only 13% have long-term care insurance, noted the findings. When asked if their health declines and they need help with daily activities and/or nursing care, almost half of retirees (48%) say they plan to rely on family members and friends to provide such care. Moreover, relatively few retirees have codified their wishes in legal documents such as powers of attorney and advance directives.

Annual Income

The survey respondents had an annual household income of $55,000 (estimated median) as of late 2023 with more than one-third of retirees (36%) having an income of less than $50,000. Retirees’ household savings excluding home equity were $71,000 (estimated median) in 2023.

Untapped opportunities might be helpful to retirees in strengthening their finances.The researchers say that retirees need to be fully engaged in financial planning or taking steps that could improve their overall situation. Only 24% indicate they have “a lot” of working knowledge about personal finance, 19% have a financial strategy for retirement in the form of a written plan, and just 7% frequently discuss saving, investing, and retirement planning with family and close friends. Only one in three (33%) use a professional financial advisor.

“Many retirees may wonder what they could have done differently to save and plan for retirement, and many may feel they have done everything right but still came up short,” said Collinson. “In reality, over their working careers, the world has changed, the retirement landscape has evolved, and the need to self-fund a greater portion of one’s retirement income has intensified.”

Thoughts about Retirement in the Ocean State

“I can confidently say there’s less road ahead to retirement than there is behind me,” quips Kemal Saatcioglu, Ph.D., associate professor and chair of the Economics and Finance Department at Rhode Island College (RIC). “Going through this report was an eye opener even for me and I came away with a mix of inspiration, awareness, and a sense of urgency,” he says.

“Asnoted in this report, the retirees’ ability to find purpose, freedom, and joy, even amid challenges shows the resiliency and flexibility we all possess, notes the RIC Professor. “Knowing that many retirees successfully navigate these waters is inspiring and is a motivator for getting into retirement planning with confidence,” he adds.

According to Saatcioglu, the report is a wake-up call for retirees. The data clearly indicates that they, in general, can be better prepared. “The statistics about limited savings, reliance on Social Security, and the lack of written financial plans might push those of us nearing retirement to re-evaluate our financial readiness. The survey data will likely create motivation to consult a financial advisor to ensure better use of available resources,” he says.

Saatcioglu calls the points about life expectancy and the length of retirement striking. “While it may be daunting at first to consider how 15 to 20 years could stretch retirement savings, prioritizing strategies for sustainability, such as long-term care insurance or budgeting for healthcare costs are great steps to take,” he says, especially the importance of mental health and stress management also encourages a more holistic view of our overall well-being.

Retirees must recognize local challenges and strengths. “Granted Rhode Island is not the most retirement friendly state. Higher costs of living, especially on housing, utilities, and food, and less than a friendly tax environment are challenges but knowing about them ahead of time and taking steps early on can mitigate those challenges,” recommends Saatcioglu.

Finally, Saatcioglu believes that the survey creates a motivation to take action—whether it’s updating financial plans, discussing retirement goals with family, or exploring community resources. Retirement can be an exciting, and rather long, stage of life, as long as proactive steps are taken now.

Maureen Maigret, Policy Advisor for the Senior Agenda Coalition, notes that the findings of the Transamerica report align with what older Rhode Islanders are concerned with in terms of their economic security, especially the cost of healthcare and housing, worries about being able to afford any needed long-term services and a lack of planning to meet those need. “Adding to those worries is uncertainty about possible proposed changes from a new federal administration for two of the most valuable programs for older adults – Social Security and Medicare,” she says.

According to Maigret, the Senior Agenda Coalition of RI (SACRI) has advocated to enhance the economic security of older Rhode Islanders. She stated that a recent SACRI survey found the costs for health care and housing were priority issues for the state’s older population. “That’s why we will continue to work in 2025 to expand the Medicare Savings Program to increase its income eligibility so lower-income older adults and persons on Medicare will be able to get their Medicare Part B premium covered and in some cases co-payments,” she says, also stressing the importance of ensurng that the housing bond funds are targeted toward developing more affordable housing options for older adults.

“I deeply appreciate the insights in this report. It highlights the importance of proactive retirement planning and the emotional and financial complexities retirees face in the post-pandemic economy,” says Josh Wells, CEO of The Retirement Factory, who stresses the importance of balancing the emotional and financial aspects of retirement.

According to Wells, retirees often feel the weight of navigating Social Security decisions or managing healthcare costs. This report underscores that many retirees are unsure about these critical choices, with only 7% frequently discussing retirement planning with family or friends and just 33% using a financial advisor. ”It’s a powerful reminder that education and open dialogue are key to achieving retirement confidence,” he says.

“Rhode Island retirees exemplify resilience and adaptability in the face of change,” says Wells. “The report highlights that 70% of retirees feel confident about maintaining a comfortable lifestyle, even amidst financial and health challenges. For Ocean State retirees, this confidence is bolstered by state-specific benefits such as the ability to exclude up to $20,000 of retirement income from state taxes for those at full retirement age and meeting income thresholds, as well as property tax relief of up to $600 for eligible seniors with limited incomes,” he says, noting that these program reflect “the state’s commitment to supporting its senior population, enabling retirees to plan carefully, stay connected to their communities, and enjoy a fulfilling retirement.”

Like the report’s findings, RI retirees are juggling competing financial priorities, especially with only a minimal 2024 increase in their ERSRI pension, says Sandra Paquette, representing the Advocates for Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) Restoration and Pension Reform. Of equal, often ignored significance, these retirees have been deprived of 13 years of potential savings,” she says.

“By unjustly removing a COLA, the former teachers, state workers and some municipal employees have been plunged into survival mode, where limited, fixed incomes are barely sufficient to cover necessities and essentials. In many instances, choices must be made among prescriptions, heating and food– by individuals who spent a lifetime of service, and of contributing to their retirement benefits,” adds Paquette.

For a copy of Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies’ new report, go to https://www.transamericainstitute.org/research/publications/details/retiree-life-in-the-post-pandemic-economy-2024.

Trump’s Campaign Pledges Could impact Social Security’s Financial Stability

Published in Blackstone Valley Call & Times on November 4, 2024

When voters go to the polls on Tuesday, they should know that Social Security will only be nine years away from insolvency when the next President takes office. According to projections by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the law calls for a 23 percent cut in Social Security reductions in fiscal year 2034. Restoring solvency in the retirement program over the next 75 years would require the equivalent of reducing all future benefits by 24 percent or increasing revenue by 35 percent, says CBO.

As the presidential campaign winds down, with voting taking place on Nov. 4, 2024, Vice President Kamala Harris calls for protecting and expanding Social Security while former President Trump says would “fight for and protect Social Security.” But both candidates don’t provide a specific detail plan as to how to fix the financially ailing Social Security program, despite the looming $16,500 cut facing a typical couple retiring just before the projected insolvency.

But campaign promises, if enacted, can have a devastating impact on the Social Security Programs ability to pay all future benefits.

Analysis Shows Campaign Promises Weaken Social Security

A new report, “What Would the Trump Campaign’s Mean for Social Security,” released by US Budget Watch 2024, a project the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), details how former President Donald Trump’s proposed policies, if enacted, would advance Social Security’s insolvency by three years, from FY 2034 to FY 2031 – hastening the next President’s insolvency timeline by one-third. CRFB is a non-partisan government watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. that analyses the fiscal impact of federal budget and fiscal issues.

According to CRFB’s new report, released on Oct. 21, 2024, Trump campaign pledges would weaken Social Security’s financial stability by ending taxation of Social Security benefits. This would eliminate a revenue stream currently used to help finance Social Security. If enacted, the analysis notes that Trump’s plans would increase Social Security’s ten-year cash shortfall by $2.3 trillion through FY 2035. Additionally, ending all taxes on overtime pay and tips, would also reduce the payroll taxes accruing to the Social Security trust funds.

CRFB’s analysis also predicted that Trump’s policies would worsen Social Security’s finances by increasing Social Security’s annual shortfall by roughly 50 percentin FY 2035, from 3.6 to 4 percent of payroll.

Trump’s calls for large tariffs on imports, which would either increase cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) through higher inflation or reduce taxable payroll would impact the financial viability of the Social Security program. Enhancing boarder security and deporting unauthorized immigrants would reduce the number of immigrant workers paying into the Social Security Trust funds.

CRFB also questions whether Trump’s fixes would reduce Social Security’s long-term shortfalls.

From the Sideline…

According to Aimee Picchi is associate managing editor for CBS MoneyWatch, the personal finance website received a statement from Trump spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt disputing the CRFB analysis: “The so-called experts at CRFB have been consistently wrong throughout the years. President Trump delivered on his promise to protect Social Security in his first term, and President Trump will continue to strongly protect Social Security in his second term,” she said.

Additionally, Leavitt told CBS Money Watch that Trump’s plans for “unleashing American energy, slashing job-killing regulations, and adopting pro-growth America First tax and trade policies” would put Social Security “on a stronger footing for generations to come.”

“President Trump has said he would close Social Security’s long-term shortfall by increasing drilling for oil and natural gas and by growing the economy. However, we’ve shown that increased energy exploration is unlikely to have a meaningful effect on Social Security – even if the gains were deposited into the trust fund. We’ve also shown that it would require unrealistically fast economic growth to close Social Security’s existing long-term funding gap,” says CRFB’s analysis. .

“Faster growth can reduce Social Security’s shortfall [says Trump]. But based on available analyses and understanding the effects of President Trump’s agenda on the national debt, it is unlikely his plans would significantly boost the size of the economy, and many estimates find his plans would reduce long-term out-put long-term output,” adds CRFB.

Responding to CRFB’s analysis, in a statement Harris-Walz 2024 spokesperson Joseph Costello said: “Vice President Harris is committed to protecting Social Security benefits and is the only candidate who will actually fight for seniors, not just pay them lip service on the campaign trail.

Expand Social Security Caucus House Co-Chairs Reps. John B. Larso (D -CT), Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ), and Debbie Dingell (D – MI) )call Trump’s campaign pledges “a no starter.” If implemented, they would eliminate revenue streams used to help finance Social Security and accelerate the depletion of Social Security funding,” they say.

“Maintaining the solvency of Social Security is vital for promoting economic security, and a moral obligation to honor the commitments made to those who have contributed to the system throughout their working lives. To safeguard the future of Social Security, we cannot allow for Trump’s policies to gut these hard-earned benefits and instead must engage in a simple reform like the Social Security 2100 Act that fixes insolvency by having the wealthy pay into the system the same as everyone else,” note the Co-Chairs.

And Max Richtman, President and CEO, National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, gives his thought’s to Trump’s campaign pledges: “We oppose his proposal to eliminate the taxes on benefits that help to fund the system, and any other measure that would deprive Social Security of much needed revenue,” he says.

“Once again, Trump postures as a friend of the working class, then puts forward plans that endanger the benefits working people have earned — and depend on in retirement. It is irresponsible for a presidential candidate to advocate plans that would hasten the depletion of the Social Security trust fund reserves, triggering an even larger automatic benefit cut if that happens,” adds Richtman.

According to Richtman, Trump’s plans reveal his “overall recklessness” with Social Security. “He suspended the payroll tax that funds the program during Covid — and hoped it would be eliminated. His White House budgets would have slashed Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) by billions of dollars. He said earlier this year that he was ‘open’ to ‘cutting entitlements,’ then tried to walk it back. He once called Social Security a ‘Ponzi Scheme,” he adds.

“Time and again, Trump has chosen political expediency without considering – or caring about – the consequences. Despite his posturing, Donald Trump is no friend to Social Security or American seniors,” charges Richtman.

Looking Back on Efforts to Fix Social Security

“The history and reasoning in both Congress and the White House on protecting Social Security is still important and persuasive– as it was to President Obama, and House and Senate leaders Pelosi and Reid,” says Robert Weiner, former chief of Staff of the House Aging Committee and later a White House senior staffer

“The great Claude Pepper helped forge the Reagan-O’Neill-Pepper deal of 1983 that stopped cuts and even partial insolvency through 2034,” says Weiner, noting that he remembers Pepper saying “over my dead body” to cabinet officers and congressional leaders who wanted to impose severe cuts.

Weiner noted that Nancy Pelosi said “First, do no harm” to the would-be cutters right through all the years of her Speakership and leadership. “’We did that’ to stopping the Social Security cutters, she told Weiner.

Senate Leader Harry Reid’s staff removed the term ‘reform’ from his Social Security talking points when they were given the documents and realized that the program has a surplus, not a deficit,” noted Weiner. “These great leaders knew that Social Security ‘reform’ meant cuts, breaking Social Security’s promise to American seniors, and that the deficit was a myth and excuse to take from the program and its two-trillion-plus dollar surplus,” he said.

“And House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told me that congressional leaders knew that, if necessary, if the time comes, and it’s not now, a slight tweak by Congress to raise the income level for tax payments could fix it, if necessary, if the growing economy hadn’t already maintained full solvency,” says Weiner.

“Let’s hope this kind of sanity and sensitivity continues to prevail,” Weiner concludes.

https://www.crfb.org/blogs/what-would-trump-campaign-plans-mean-social-security

Expanding Medicare on political agendas: In-home Health Care critically important

Published in RINewsToday on October 14, 2024

This week Vice President Kamala Harris unveiled a “Medicare at Home” proposal on ABC’s The View that would expands Medicare to assist older Americans to age in place at home by covering some of the cost of in-home care. The proposal targets adults who are part of the ‘sandwich generation,’ estimated to be 105 million Americans who are raising children along with taking care of their elderly parents.

The Medicare benefit to assist caregivers would propose to have cost-saving benefits for the federal government by allowing seniors to stay at home rather than being sent to costly nursing homes. It would also reduce hospitalizations, too.

Harris told about her personal experience as a caregiver, providing care to her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, a biomedical scientist, who died of cancer in 2009 at the age of 70. Caring for a parent can translate into “trying to cook what they want to eat, what they can eat,” she said. “It’s even trying to think of something funny to make them laugh or smile,” she added.

“We’re talking about declining skills” of older people, “but their dignity, their pride, has not declined,” Harris added.

“There are so many people in our country who are right in the middle. They’re taking care of their kids and they’re taking care of their aging parents, and it’s just almost impossible to do it all, especially if they work,” Harris said. “…we’re finding that so many are having to leave their job, which means losing a source of income, not to mention the emotional stress,” she said, explaining why there is a need to expand Medicare to cover more in-home care services.

Harris’ Issues on her website – Protect and Strengthen Social Security and Medicare

“Vice President Harris will protect Social Security and Medicare against relentless attacks from Donald Trump and his extreme allies. She will strengthen Social Security and Medicare for the long haul by making millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share in taxes. She will always fight to ensure that Americans can count on getting the benefits they earned”.

The Costs

The Brookings Institution recently estimated that a “very conservatively designed” program would cost $40 billion a year. They noted that “controlling demand in such a program is nearly impossible – for reference, Medicaid, which covers far fewer adults than Medicare, actually spent $207 billion on long-term services and supports in 2021”.

In addition, “Home health is such a hotbed of fraud,” said Theo Merkel, a health policy expert at the Paragon Health Institute and the Manhattan Institute. “If the proposal is adopted, taxpayers could end up paying for everyone who stays at home with their Medicare-eligible family member as a government paid Service Employees International Union member.”

The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank headquartered in Washington, D.C., charges that Harris’ new Medicare home care benefit is “uncompassionate, fiscally reckless, and a corrupt attempt to buy the votes of Medicare enrollees and their middle-aged children in an election year.”

Examining the Differences…

According to Matthew E. Shepard, Communications Director for the Center for Medicare Advocacy, the new Harris proposal is quite different from the existing home care benefits that Medicare’s 65.5 million enrollees receive. ”The new proposal focuses on Long Term Services and Supports, something of a term of art in the health care world. While details are scarce, it would provide, we believe, ongoing affordable home care aide service without a need for skilled care or that strict definition of homebound,” said Shepard. The proposal’s funding would come from increased savings in Medicare Part D as the list of negotiable drugs grows [a historic provision of the Inflation Reduction Act which is lowering the cost of senior’s medication] savings currently estimated at $6 billion in 2026, and which will only grow as more drugs are added, he noted.

“We are going to save Medicare that money, because we’re not going to be paying these high prices [for drugs] and that those resources are then put to use in a way that helps a family,” Harris said.

The Trump proposal

The Trump/Vance campaign quickly issued a statement taking credit for already making a commitment to America’s seniors receiving at-home care, saying that Harris’ Medicare expansion policy was just following his lead. Former President Trump released his home care platform last summer, according to an Oct. 8th statement. “Specifically, President Trump will prioritize home care benefits by shifting resources back to at-home senior care, overturning disincentives that lead to care worker shortages, and supporting paid family caregivers through tax credits and reduced red tape,” noted the statement.

One of Trump’s 20 point platforms is “Fight for and protect social security and Medicare with no cuts, including no changes to the retirement age”. In the accompanying 16-page document, which, supports Medicare it says, “President Trump has made absolutely clear that he will not cut one penny from Medicare or Social Security. American citizens work hard their whole lives, contributing to Social Security and Medicare. These programs are promises to our Seniors, ensuring they can live their golden years with dignity. Republicans will protect these vital programs and ensure Economic Stability. We will work with our great Seniors, in order to allow them to be active and healthy. We commit to safeguarding the future for our Seniors and all American families. We will strengthen Medicare. Republicans will protect Medicare’s finances from being financially crushed by the Democrat plan to add tens of millions of new illegal immigrants to the rolls of Medicare. We vow to strengthen Medicare for future generations.”

Dementia caregiving already set to quadruple in 2025

AARP notes on their website that one expansion of caregiver coverage, “a program for dementia patients and their caregivers that launched this year will quadruple in 2025, serving more of the country. The program, called Guiding an Improved Dementia Experience (GUIDE), provides a 24/7 support line, a care navigator to find medical services and community-based assistance, caregiver training and up to $2,500 a year for at-home, overnight or adult day care respite services. Patients and their caregivers typically won’t have copayments”.

Praise for expanding Medicare benefits

“We have long championed the expansion of federal support for long-term care,“ says Max Richtman, President and CEO, National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare (NCPSSM), noting that Harris’ proposal gives that cause an enormous boost.

“Expanded Medicare coverage for home health care also would provide relief to millions of ‘sandwich generation’ Americans, who are struggling to provide care for their elderly relatives while also raising children. Those ‘sandwich generation’ members are not Medicare beneficiaries, but would most definitely benefit from Harris’ long-term care plan,” says Richtman in an Oct. 8 statement.

According to Richtman, the plan also would add hearing and vision coverage to traditional Medicare. “Proper hearing and vision care are essential to healthy aging — but too many beneficiaries forgo it due to cost and lack of coverage. It is long past time that those coverages be added,” he added.

Co-Director David Lipschutz says that the Center for Medicare Advocacy (CMA) strongly supports the proposed enhancement of Medicare coverage for on-going home care. “Access to services and supports in the home for those who are unable to independently perform activities of daily living would provide immeasurable help to millions of beneficiaries and their families and is an important step forward for the Medicare program,” says CMA’s Lipschutz. To maximize access to care for people who need it, expansion of home care coverage in Medicare should be combined with enforcing the benefit that exists now, he suggests.

“Recognizing that most older persons and those with disabilities prefer to remain at home when they need help with daily living tasks, the Senior Agenda Coalition has worked for years to increase access to home and community-based care at the state level as these services are one of the biggest gaps in Medicare,” says Maureen Maigret, Policy Advisor for Senior Agenda Coalition of RI. To include them in Medicare will lift a financial burden on both recipients and family caregivers as home care costing at least $35/hour that can be out of reach for far too many who need these services to stay at home,” she says.

“We have not seen many details about the plan, but it would be important to make sure that Medicare provider reimbursement levels are sufficient to allow direct care staff to earn livable wages in order to have workforce sufficient to meet the demand,” note Maigret. “This new Medicare home care benefit should also be a boon for states as it can prevent persons from spending down their resources to a level where they become eligible for state Medicaid and need costly nursing home care,” she says.

In a new paper for O’Neill Institute for Georgetown Law, McCourt Professor Judith Feder and Nicole Jorwic explore how adding a home care benefit can help beneficiaries and family caregivers. “While this new benefit would not reach the full population in need of long-term care, paired with investments in Medicaid, it’s a good strong start-and given our nation’s resources, clearly within our means,” say the authors.

“A support system that relies on unpaid family members and underpaid workers is simply not sustainable for the future,” warn the authors.

“Our failure to make Medicare “whole” by addressing Long Term Services and Support needs is not about a shortage of resources, it’s about a shortage of political will. It’s time the nation stepped up,” they say.

Pay attention to Caregiver voters

AARP is nonpartisan and does not take a position on campaign proposals, though AARP has previously said financial relief is needed to help individuals age in place at home and support family caregivers, says Sarah Lovenheim, AARP’s vice president, external relations.

According to AARP’s “She’s the Difference” survey released last month, 96% of woman aged 50 and over say they are highly motivated to vote in the upcoming elections, making them one of the most driven and key voting groups.

“Any political candidate would be wise to pay attention to the concerns and needs of caregivers today. Voters over age 50, who disproportionately make up America’s 48 million plus caregivers, could make or break elections up and down the ballots,” says Nancy LeaMond, AARP’s executive vice president and chief advocacy and engagement officer. “From recent battleground polls, we know that roughly one-third of swing voters over age 50 identify as family caregivers,” she notes.

“Supporting family caregivers is an urgent need – not only for families struggling to get by but for our country’s future,” warns LeaMond.

Regardless of who wins the election, a Medicare at home proposal cannot happen without Congressional support. As the presidential campaign winds down, older voters must make it extremely clear to lawmakers seeking their vote how they feel about expanding Medicare benefits.