Tag Archives for Impact Research

A Call for Supporting the Nation’s Caregivers

Published in RINewsToday on June 12, 2023

Just 519 days until the 2024 Presidential Election (Nov. 5, 2024), older voters call on Congress to provide more support for the nation’s family caregivers, according to a new AARP Family Caregiving study, released on May 5, 2023, conducted by the bipartisan polling team of Fabrizio Ward and Impact Research.

Former First Lady, Rosalynn Carter, observed that “there are only four kinds of people in the world. Those who have been caregivers. Those who are currently caregivers. Those who will be caregivers, and those who will need a caregiver.” The results of AARP’s survey of U.S. registered voters, compiled in the 26-page report, U.S. Voters’ Views on Support for Family Caregivers, gives weight to the truth behind Carter’s quote as one-third of the voters in this study were caregivers in the past, one-fifth are currently caregivers, and half expect to be a caregiver in the future.

Caregivers Call for Government Support 

According to AARP, this is especially true for those age 50 and older: over two-thirds of voters, and 75% of voters 50+, say it is very important for Congress to help seniors live in their own homes. More than half (57%) say the same for supporting unpaid family caregivers, notes the poll’s findings.

An overwhelming majority of voters, 78%, are either a current, past, or future family caregiver. Over 70% of voters across the political spectrum say they would be more likely to support a candidate who backed proposals to support family caregivers, such as a tax credit, paid family leave, and more support and respite services.

“Family caregivers are the backbone of a broken long-term care system, providing $600 billion in unpaid labor each year and saving taxpayers billions,” said Nancy LeaMond, AARP Executive Vice President and Chief Advocacy and Engagement Officer in a statement announcing the release of the poll findings. “It is long past time for lawmakers to enact commonsense solutions that support family caregivers and help older Americans live independently in their homes, where they want to be,” she says.

The poll’s findings indicate that legislative caregiving proposals are strongly supported across party lines: 89% of Democrats and 72% of Republicans support expanding services to help seniors live at home in the community rather than in a  nursing home. Requiring minimum staffing standards in nursing homes so residents receive quality care is supported by 8 of Democrats and 74% of Republicans polled in this survey. 

The researchers say that black voters, women, Democrats, and Latinos are especially likely to see long-term care and support for caregivers as key issues to be addressed by Congress. Among those groups, 77% of women, 82% of Black voters, 71% of Latinos and 77% of Democrats say expanding services to help seniors live independently in their own homes instead of a nursing home is very or extremely important.

Most caregivers feel stressed emotionally, stretched thin in both time (18%) and money (18%), and overwhelmed; 40% of all family caregivers say they spend over 20 hours a week on caregiving, with almost half (48%) of women caregivers spending over 20 hours a week.

“Anxiety over caregiving is not limited to those currently providing care,” says AARP, noting that more than two-thirds of voters express concerns about whether they will be able to get the care they need as they grow older or live independently.

“The data is clear: regardless of your political stripes, people adamantly want to age at home rather than a nursing home,” said Tony Fabrizio, partner in Fabrizio Ward, noting “It’s why support for helping caregivers is so politically important.”

“Family caregivers are stressed emotionally and financially, and proposals to help them are overwhelmingly popular and key to helping older Americans remain in their homes,” said John Anzalone, founder of Impact Research. “This may be the sleeper issue of the 2024 elections with a voting group that makes up one in five Americans,” he says.

Caregivers Need Assistance

For many caregivers, providing care to their loved ones takes a big chunk out of their yearly finances, and time that they must give to providing the caregiving. According the AARP’s report, four in ten family caregivers report spending over 20 hours a week on their caregiving responsibilities, while roughly six in ten incur $1,000 or more in annual out-of-pocket expenses on items such as medical supplies and equipment, transportation, or home modification. Emotional stress, having to miss important events, and needing to balance their work, family, and caregiving responsibilities are impact the majority of family caregivers.

When asked what they would like Congress or their state government to do, family caregivers say they would like increased access to healthcare and financial support. Seven in ten voters ages 18 and older say they would be more likely to support a political candidate who backed legislative proposals to support family caregivers, such as paid family leave; a tax credit of up to $5,000; and expanded access to support and respite services. These policies would allow family caregivers an opportunity to take a break from caregiving, helping to prevent their burnout and allowing them to continue providing caring for their loved ones.

According to the polls findings, most voters ages 18 and older express concern about whether or not they will be able to get the care they need when they grow older. Roughly two-thirds says they are concerned they won’t have enough money to pay for the care they need, or they won’t be able to live independently at home, while six in ten are worried that they will need to live in a nursing home providing poor care.

The Support for Family Caregiving study was conducted by the bipartisan polling team of Fabrizio Ward and Impact Research for AARP. The poll used a sample of U.S. voters age 18 and older (with oversamples of voters age 50 and over, black voters, Hispanic voters, Asian and Pacific voters and family caregivers) using a combination of phone and text to web sampling. A total of 1,425 completed 20-minute in length interviews, were  conducted in English from April 4-10, 2023.

The margin of error for the 1,425 adults’ sample is +/- 3.4% at the 95% level of confidence. For the oversampled groups, the margins of error are: +/- 3.4% for voters 50+, +/- 6.9% for Black and Latino voters, +/- 8.9% for AAPI voters, and +/- 4.9% for voters 50+.

To see poll findings, go to https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/research/surveys_statistics/ltc/2023/voters-views-caregiving-support-report.doi.10.26419-2Fres.00616.001.pdf.

For more details, contact Teresa Keenan, AARP’s Director, Consumer Insights, Health and Health Security, at TKeenan@AARP.org.

Seniors key to Democratic win

Published in RINewsToday on November 28, 2022

Just weeks before the midterm elections, Oct. 18th, AARP Rhode Island released a voting analysis of the Sept. 13th Rhode Island primary election, revealing that voters ages 50 + were the most powerful election deciders. More than 70% of Rhode Island’s older voters turned out to vote.  

A newly released Washington, DC-based AARP study found that older voters also had a major impact on 63 of the most competitive House races nationwide, including Rhode Island, in the mid-term elections. 

AARP’s post-election survey of voters should send a powerful message to Capitol Hill, that is “Don’t take the votes of seniors for granted.”

According to AARP’s voting analysis findings, voters 50 and over made-up 61% of the 2022 electorate in the targeted Congressional Districts. The predicted red wave sputtered because of older female voters, say the researchers. Democrats were able to win these districts because of the senior vote, particularly women over 65 who shifted away from voting GOP compared to their intensions from this summer.

The researchers found that President Biden’s job approval rebounded markedly, driven by voters aged 65+, particularly among women. When they looked at former President Trump’s approval rate, they found it had decreased among this same group.

AARP also noted that Black and Hispanic voters continued to drift to the GOP while Democrats continued to gain white, college age and female voters. 

AARP’s voting analysis study also found that in 63 most competitive House races that were also surveyed in July, voters age 65+ shifted from favoring Republican candidates 50% to 40%, to favoring Democrats 49% to 46% in November. The voting analysis found that Democrats came away with a 2-point lead over Republican candidates among voters overall (18+) and voters aged 50-64 leaned Republican by 8 points. Overall, voters 50+ accounted for 61% of the electorate in these key districts.

“Americans aged 50+ once again proved that they are the nation’s most powerful voters and they were the deciders in this year’s midterm elections,” said Nancy LeaMond, AARP Executive Vice President and Chief Advocacy and Engagement Officer in a statement released with the 36-page report on Nov. 17, 2022. “They were crystal clear that they want elected officials to work together to address crucial issues that will ensure their health and financial security. Elected officials and candidates can’t afford to ignore this formidable group of voters and the issues that matter to them,” she notes.

Top concerns of older voters

According to AARP’s National Targeted Congressional District-post-election Survey, inflation and rising prices (33%) were the top concern for voters overall, followed by abortion (28%) and threats to democracy (25%).

The survey also showed differences in the issues most important to voters 50-64 vs. those age 65 and older. Inflation and rising prices were top of mind for the 50-64 age group. Among voters 65+, threats to democracy (30%), inflation (29%), and Social Security and Medicare (24%) topped the list, the study’s findings indicate.

The researchers also found that more than half of voters (53%) said they were worried about their personal financial situation, with 65% of those who voted Republican and 42% who voted Democrat said they were worried. 

The study’s report also noted that 70% voted more for the candidate they chose, rather than against the other candidate;  Independents and younger voters were more likely to say they voted against the other candidate.

The analysis also found that a majority (53%) voted for the candidate they thought would work in a bipartisan manner, while 42% preferred candidates they thought stayed true to their beliefs and stood firm in their positions. By 36 points, Democrats preferred candidates who they thought were bipartisan, while Republicans voted by a 25 point margin for candidates they thought would stay true to their beliefs.

Methodology

As to the study’s methodology, AARP commissioned the bipartisan polling team of Fabrizio Ward and Impact Research to conduct this survey. The firms interviewed 2,353 adults in 63 of the U.S. House districts that Cook Political Report rated as “Lean” or “Toss Up” as of Nov. 7, 2022. This included a sample of 1,903 2022 general election voters distributed across the districts and 450 adults who did not vote in the 2022 general election. The interviews were conducted via landline, cellphone, and SMS-to-web between November 9-10, 2022.

AARP’s statement noted that approximately 30 voter interviews were conducted in each congressional district and any non-voters who were encountered were also interviewed. The overall sample was weighted by age, gender race and education to be representative of the adult population in the 63 congressional districts based on demographic data from the U.S. Census and consumer data. The voter sample was weighted on congressional vote choice to match 2022 election results.

To see the completed research results, go to:

Click to access aarp-targeted-congressional-districts-post-election-voter-survey.doi.10.26419-2Fres.00550.046.pdf