Congress Moves on a National Anti-Scam Strategy to Protect Older Adults

Published in RINewsToday on December 8, 2025

Last month, the AARP, recognizing that the holiday season leading up to Christmas is widely viewed as “prime time” for scams targeting older Americans, released findings from its 2025 Holiday Shopping and Scams Survey. According to the AARP Fraud Watch Network, fraud aimed at online shoppers and holiday donors continues to skyrocket.

With Christmas fast approaching, millions of Americans are preparing to shop and give online. The Survey, released just nine days before Thanksgiving, reveals that a majority of U.S. adults (89%) have encountered at least one scam. These include fake notifications about shipment issues (55%), phony charity appeals (35%), misleading digital ads (39%), and even the physical theft of packages from porches (30%). More than half of adults said they received a fake shipping notice this year, while nearly four in ten encountered deceptive ads on social media.

“Criminals are relentless during the holidays, exploiting the many opportunities that come with a busy season—from shopping and traveling to charitable giving,” said Kathy Stokes, Director of Fraud Prevention Programs at the AARP Fraud Watch Network, in a Nov. 18 statement. “Understanding how they operate is the first step toward protecting yourself and your loved ones,” she says.

Although online scams continue to rise, many consumers still prefer using debit cards—even though recouping funds taken from a victim’s bank account often takes far longer than resolving a disputed credit card charge. Still, the report shows that safer payment habits are gaining ground.

While 72% of consumers plan to use a debit card this year, credit card use is up significantly from 2024 (64%), with nearly seven in ten planning to use a credit card during the upcoming holiday season.

The survey also found that 64% of consumers who plan to purchase gift cards this season expect to buy them off the rack at retail stores, such as grocery stores or pharmacies. This continues to be a major vulnerability: 33% of U.S. adults reported giving or receiving a gift card with no balance. Fraudsters often record the card number, expose and reseal the PIN, then wait for activation before draining the funds.

Consumers are increasingly targeted through peer-to-peer (P2P) payment apps as well, with two in five users reporting that they have sent money to someone they did not know. Despite growing awareness, many people still underestimate the risks of using debit cards or fail to verify charitable organizations before donating.

New Federal Plan Aims to Protect Seniors

AARP’s survey found that 92% of respondents—across liberal, moderate, and conservative viewpoints—want Congress to do more to protect older adults from fraud. And Congress appears to be listening.

Last week, U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), ranking member of the Senate Aging Committee, held a Dec. 4 virtual press conference announcing the introduction of S. 3355, National Strategy for Combating Scams Act of 2025, legislation aimed at providing stronger safeguards for seniors this holiday season and beyond. This bill was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Gillibrand warned that financial scams, which cost Americans more than $16 billion last year, disproportionately harm older adults.

Throughout the event, Gillibrand underscored the economic hardship caused when older adults lose money to fraud. She noted the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, which is enabling scammers to create more sophisticated and “hyper-realistic imposter scams” that require immediate government action.

Senate cosponsors include Sens. Rick Scott (R-FL), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), and Ashley Moody (R-FL). H.R. 6425, companion legislation is being led in the House by Reps. Gabe Amo (D-RI) and Derek Schmidt (R-KS). Hopefully, we’ll see Rep. Seth Magaziner (D-RI) join Rep. Eleanor Homes Del Norton (D-District of Columbia) and Rep. Sarah McBride (D-DE) as cosponsors.

According to Gillibrand, more than four in ten Americans say they have lost money to scams or had their sensitive information stolen. Older adults account for an estimated 30% of financial losses, with an average loss of $83,000 per incident. Gillibrand shared the story of a 75-year-old man who received up to five scam calls each day and a senior woman who lost $39,000.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO), often referred to as Congress’s watchdog, recently identified at least 13 federal agencies conducting anti-scam efforts, each working independently under different mandates. GAO recommended that the FBI take the lead in establishing a unified National Strategy for Combating Scams. Gillibrand’s bill would give the FBI a legal obligation to implement that framework.

During the press conference, Gillibrand also addressed underreporting, noting that many victims—like her own aunt who lost $5,000 to a scammer impersonating an FBI agent—feel too embarrassed to tell family members or law enforcement. She shared the story in response to a question from Brian O’Neill, host of Newsmaker on WLEA Radio, underscoring how shame and secrecy allow scammers to continue exploiting vulnerable individuals.

“I’m proud to introduce the bipartisan National Strategy for Combating Scams Act to help make sure seniors don’t get scrooged this holiday season,” said Gillibrand. “It’s clear that we need a coordinated national strategy to tackle the increasingly sophisticated scams targeting our seniors, and this legislation would bring that to fruition. I look forward to working with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to get this vital bill across the finish line.”

Sen.Rick Scott (R-FL), chair of the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, added: “Families across the country are being hammered by increasingly sophisticated scams, and Washington has been far too slow to respond. This bipartisan effort finally brings federal agencies together, cuts duplication, and creates a real national plan to protect seniors and hardworking Americans.

AARP, which represents 125 million adults age 50 and over, strongly endorses the National Strategy for Combating Scams Act of 2025. “The strategy encourages smarter use of technology, better data collection, and stronger partnerships with banks, tech companies, and law enforcement to help prevent scams and support victims. And it prioritizes making resources easier to access, providing more effective recovery for those who’ve been targeted,” says AARP’s Jennifer Jones, vice president of Financial Security & Livable Communities, Government Affairs.

House Considers Companion Anti-Scam Bill

On the House side, Rep. Amo introduces a companion measure (H.R. 6425). “Too many Rhode Islanders have been taken for a ride by scammers skimming their pockets and stealing their hard-earned money, leaving many devastated and destitute,” he said. “I’m proud to introduce the bipartisan National Strategy for Combating Scams Act to ensure we are addressing the rising scam threat in a coordinated and strategic manner.”

According to the FBI, Rhode Islanders lost $6,309,411 to senior fraud in 2024 alone. Earlier this year, Amo launched the bipartisan Stop Scams Caucus to combat financial fraud, cyber scams, and cross-border criminal networks. In Rhode Island, he also convened a roundtable discussion at the Middletown Senior Center focused on scam prevention.

The National Strategy for Combating Scams Act is endorsed by a broad coalition of national organizations, including AARP, Aspen Institute Financial Security Program, Chamber of Progress, Global Anti-Scam Alliance, Justice in Aging, the National Adult Protective Services Association (NAPSA), National Association of Social Workers, National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, National Caucus and Center on Black Aging, National Sheriffs’ Association, Stop Scams Alliance, and many others.

To view AARP’s holiday scam report, go to https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/research/topics/work-finances-retirement/fraud-consumer-protection/holiday-shopping-scams-2025.doi.10.26419-2fres.00992.001.pdf

Aging Groups Say 2026 Social Security COLA Falls Short of What’s Needed for Seniors

Published in RINewsToday on October 27, 2025/

On October 24, the Social Security Administration (SSA) announced a 2.8 percent Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) increase for 75 million beneficiaries, including those receiving Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments.

Specifically, nearly 71 million Social Security beneficiaries and OASDI recipients will see a 2.8 percent COLA starting in January 2026. In contrast, SSI recipients will begin seeing their increased payments on December 31, 2025. (Note: Some individuals receive both Social Security benefits and SSI.)

According to the SSA, the average Social Security retirement benefit will increase by approximately $56 per month, bringing the average monthly check to $2,071, up from $2,015 in 2025. For married couples, the average increase will be $88, raising their monthly benefit from $3,120 in 2025 to $3,208 in 2026.

Over the past decade, the average COLA increase has been about 3.1 percent. (Note our calculations, below, which excluded the highs and lows due to COVID comes out with an average of 2.6%). For 2025, the COLA was 2.5 percent. However, in historical terms, this COLA ranks about average, coming in 29th out of the 51 COLAs announced since the government began tying COLAs to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in 1975, according to The Senior Citizens League (TSCL).

The Social Security Act mandates how the COLA is calculated, tying it to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), as determined by the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The SSA’s announcement, originally scheduled for October 15, was delayed by nine days. According to the federal agency and multiple news outlets, the delay was caused by furloughed employees at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which hindered the timely release of the September CPI-W report during the federal government shutdown.

Other annual adjustments, effective each January, are based on increases in average wages. For 2026, the maximum amount of earnings subject to Social Security taxes (the taxable maximum) is expected to rise to $184,500 from $176,100.

“Social Security is a promise kept, and the annual cost-of-living adjustment is one way we ensure benefits reflect today’s economic realities and continue to provide a foundation of security,” said Social Security Administration Commissioner Frank J. Bisignano in a statement announcing the 2026 COLA. “The cost-of-living adjustment is a vital part of how Social Security delivers on its mission.”

Notification of 2026 COLA Increase

The SSA will begin notifying beneficiaries about their new benefit amounts by mail in early December 2025. As in previous years, beneficiaries will receive a simplified, one-page COLA notice that uses plain language and provides details on their new benefit amount and any deductions.

Beneficiaries with a “my Social Security” account can view their COLA notices online, which is secure, easy, and faster than receiving a letter in the mail. Account holders can also set up text or email alerts for new messages, including COLA notifications. That information should be out in the first or second week of November.

To receive COLA notices online, individuals must create or sign in to their personal “my Social Security” account and opt out of paper notices by November 19, 2025. Create an account at www.ssa.gov/myaccount. In addition to COLA notices, account holders can also access their Social Security card replacement request, claim status, benefits information, and SSA-1099 forms.

Information about Medicare changes for 2026 will be available at www.medicare.gov. For Medicare enrollees, 2026 premium amounts will be available via the “my Social Security” Message Center starting in late November. Those who have not opted for online notices will receive their COLA notices by mail in December.

Aging Advocacy Groups Call New COLA “Inadequate”

According to an AARP survey, conducted in Sept. 2025, even a COLA around 3% was viewed “insufficient to do the job,” says Bryan Miller, AARP Research. Only 22% of Americans age 50-plus agree that “a COLA of right around 3% for Social Security recipients is enough to keep up with rising prices,” while 77% disagree, stated, noting that this sentiment was consistent across political party affiliations, with large majorities of republicans (75%), Independents (82%) and Democrats (79%) expressing disagreement,” noted Miller in a web article published on Oct. 21, 2025.

“Nearly three-quarters (72%) of older Americans selected 5% or higher, with one quarter (25%) indicating that an 8% increase would be necessary to keep pace with rising costs. Responses to this question were consistent across political party affiliations,” adds Miller.

With the SSA’s announcement of the 2026 COLA three days later, aging advocacy groups expressed concern over the adequacy of the increase.

“Over the past year, many older Americans have been financially squeezed, and Social Security is a key to their financial stability,” said AARP Chief Executive Officer Myechia Minter-Jordan. “AARP has fought for Social Security for decades — including efforts to protect the COLA from cuts,” she said.

Nancy Altman, President of Social Security Works, echoed these concerns, noting that the COLA fails to fully address rising costs, especially healthcare. “This year, Medicare Part B premiums are projected to rise by about 11.6 percent, nearly double last year’s increase,” Altman said. “For the average beneficiary, this will consume nearly half of their COLA increase. For some, it will use up the entire COLA increase — all while the costs of other necessities, such as food and housing, continue to climb.”

Altman also pointed out that Social Security beneficiaries who are not yet eligible for Medicare and rely on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces for insurance face even steeper challenges. “Next year, ACA premiums are expected to rise sharply, with those over 50 being hit hardest.”

Max Richtman, President and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare (NCPSSM), agreed, saying, “The 2.8% COLA will be a disappointment for many seniors struggling to cover their bills. This is the second lowest COLA since 2021 and only a slight increase from this year’s rate.” He added that the COLA doesn’t keep pace with inflation, particularly in areas where prices are rising sharply, such as medical, housing, and grocery costs.

Richtman and NCPSSM have long advocated for a more accurate COLA formula, specifically the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly (CPI-E), which would better reflect the spending patterns of older adults, who tend to allocate more of their income to healthcare and housing. “The CPI-W, which is used to calculate the current COLA, does not accurately capture seniors’ spending habits,” Richtman said.

“The 2026 COLA is going to hurt seniors. Year after year, they warn that Social Security’s meager increases won’t be enough, and the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that about 10 percent of retirement-age Americans live in poverty. However, our research suggests that the number may be higher. It’s about time our elected representatives show up for seniors, or else seniors won’t show up for them at the voting booth,” states TSCL’s Executive Director Shannon Benton.

Richard Fiesta, Executive Director of the Alliance for Retired Americans calls for Congress to make strengthening and expanding social Security national priority. “If billionaires and the wealthiest 1 percent pay their fair share, we can boost benefits for everyone and guarantee the program’s solvency for future generations,” he suggests.

Fixing the COLA Formula

Social Security Works, TSCL, the NCPSSM, Alliance for Retired Americans and AARP are all calling on Congress to adopt the CPI-E to calculate COLAs. The CPI-E more accurately reflects the spending habits of seniors, particularly in categories like healthcare and housing, which are weighted more heavily in the CPI-E. Adopting this index would likely result in higher COLAs for Social Security beneficiaries.

NCPSSM’s Richtman supports several pieces of legislation that would adopt the CPI-E, including bills sponsored by Senators Bernie Sanders and Mazie Hirono, and Representatives John Larson, Val Hoyle, and Jill Tokuda. “This change is long overdue,” he said. “Instead of expecting seniors to scrape by, Congress should act now to help beneficiaries better cope with rising living costs.”

With the Latest SSA Trustee Report Released, Congress Must Act Now to Fix Social Security

Published in Blackstone Valley Call & Times on June 24, 2025

Just before Medicare celebrates its 60th anniversary this July and Social Security marks its 90th birthday in August, the Social Security Board of Trustees recently released its annual report on the financial status of the Social Security Trust Funds.

According to this year’s estimate, by 2033, projected revenues will only cover 77% of scheduled benefits—unless Congress takes action to address the program’s looming shortfall. Combining the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and Disability Insurance (DI) trust funds would extend coverage for another year, ensuring 81% of scheduled benefits through 2034, instead of 2035, as previously estimated.

The trustees also reported that Medicare’s Hospital Insurance Trust Fund (Medicare Part A, which covers certain healthcare services) will be able to pay full benefits until 2033, a year earlier than the previous estimate of 2024. At that point, the fund is expected to cover 89% of benefits.

For 2024, the Social Security Administration (SSA) paid $1.47 trillion in benefits to about 68 million beneficiaries, while its administrative costs were just $7.4 billion—representing a very low 0.5% of total expenditures. However, the projected 75-year actuarial deficit is 3.82% of taxable payroll, higher than the 3.50% projected in last year’s report.

Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security, stressed that ensuring the financial stability of the trust funds remains a top priority for the Trump Administration. “We must work together—Congress, SSA, and others—to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse to protect and strengthen the trust funds for millions of Americans who rely on it for secure retirement or disability benefits,” he stated.

In responding to the released Trustee’s report, House Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee Ranking Member John B. Larson (D-CT) criticized the current administration’s approach, calling the Trustees’ Report a wake-up call to enhance Social Security for the first time in more than 50 years. Larson also pushed back against misleading claims from President Trump and Elon Musk about waste and abuse within the system. “Seniors, veterans, and disabled workers rely on these earned benefits, and they’re counting on Congress to do its job,” Larson said. “While Republicans push for privatization, Democrats have a plan to protect and expand Social Security.”

Larson’s Social Security 2100 Act, introduced in the last Congress with 189 cosponsors, aims to strengthen Social Security by expanding benefits and increasing payroll taxes to ensure the program’s long-term solvency.

Media Headlines on Social Security’s “Insolvency” Create Unnecessary Fear

Some media outlets, including The Washington Post, have raised alarms with bold headlines warning that Social Security could become “insolvent by 2033” or even “bankrupt.” In a statement, Bob Weiner, former Chief of Staff to the U.S. House Committee on Aging, rejects these claims, noting that the SSA currently holds a $2.7 trillion surplus. According to Weiner, the Trustees’ warning that the program may cover only 81% of benefits by 2034 is being misinterpreted as insolvency or bankruptcy. “That’s neither bankruptcy nor insolvency. Congress can fix this, perhaps by raising the income cap on Social Security taxes,” Weiner explains.

Weiner points out that, in 2026, the income cap for paying Social Security taxes is set to be $181,800. He also emphasizes that Social Security has faced repeated budget cuts to fund tax breaks for the wealthy. “We must protect Social Security as a priority,” Weiner says. “As Speaker Emerita Pelosi often reminds us, ‘First, do no harm.’”

Aging Groups Give Their Thoughts About Fixing Social Security

In statements, Social Security advocacy groups have also weighed in on and give comments on the latest Social Security and Medicare Trustee reports.

Nancy Altman, President of Social Security Works, argues that the program is fully affordable and costs only about 6% of the GDP at the end of the 21st century. She believes Congress will act to avert the projected shortfall, as it always has in the past. The key question to ask, Altman says, is whether lawmakers will choose to bring in more money through higher taxes or reduce benefits.

Altman strongly opposes cutting benefits, charges that politicians who don’t support increasing Social Security revenue are, by default, advocating for cuts. She highlights the impact of income inequality, which has cost Social Security over $1.4 trillion since 1983. “If the wealthy paid their fair share into the program, we could easily protect and expand Social Security’s modest benefits,” she notes.

While Americans are divided on many issues, Altman points out that there is broad consensus in support of Social Security. “The real crisis facing Social Security is not a future shortfall, but the ongoing sabotage it’s experiencing now,” she says. Altman specifically references the role of Elon Musk’s DOGE, which has pushed out thousands of Social Security staff members, including nearly half of its senior executives, resulting in an irreplaceable loss of institutional knowledge.

Despite these challenges, Altman notes that Social Security is run efficiently, with administrative costs well under a penny for every dollar spent. A major increase or decrease in administrative spending would have minimal impact on the program’s finances.

Max Richtman, President and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, says this year’s comments on the Trustees’ report, mirrors those he made last year – It’s time to rebuild reserves in the Social Security Trust Fund. However, he warns against harmful proposals such as raising the retirement age or means-testing benefits, both of which would cut benefits for millions of Americans.

“Raising the retirement age to 69 or 70 would significantly reduce lifetime benefits. These ideas have been part of Republican proposals to address the projected shortfall,” Richtman explains.

Richard Fiesta, Executive Director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, urges aging advocacy groups not to remain complacent. “Republicans in Congress are eager to cut the benefits Americans have worked a lifetime to earn,” he warns. “We cannot allow Social Security to be privatized or dismantled.”

Fiesta also calls for stronger Medicare reform, urging Congress to curb the high cost of prescription drugs and hold Medicare Advantage insurance corporations accountable for rising costs that don’t benefit patients.

A Final Note…

Social Security is an essential lifeline for millions of Americans, and its future is now at a crossroads. Can a partisan Congress work together to find a political viable fix?

While the media reports Social Security’s impending insolvency and bankruptcy, there is no doubt that Congress must act soon to ensure the program’s long-term sustainability. Whether through increasing revenue or reforming benefits, the decision on how to strengthen Social Security will shape the future of retirement and disability benefits for generations to come. It’s time for Congress to act.

View the 2025 Trustees Report at www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/TR/2025/.

Herb Weiss

Aging Issues

Tag Archives for Congress