Tag Archives for 118th Congress

Shortage of direct care professionals a local and national concern

Published in RINewsTdoay on April 22, 2024

Last week, at  the Senate Dirksen Building, Room SD-562,  Chairman Bob Casey, of the U.S. Special Committee on Aging, (D-PA), showcased S. 4120, legislation that he introduced with U.S. Senators Tim Kaine (D-VA), and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI). The Long-Term Care Workforce Support Act, introduced during the 118thCongress, would ensure that direct care professionals have a sustainable, lifelong career by providing substantial new funding to support these workers in every part of the long-term care industry, from nursing homes to home care, to assisted living facilities.

The Senate Aging Committee details a number of statistical findings showing the need for Congress to address the nation’s severe ongoing direct care professional workforce shortage. “A recent survey revealed 92% of nursing facility respondents and nearly 70% of assisted living facilities reported significant or severe workforce shortages.

In 2022, a survey of nursing facilities showed more than 50% of the facilities were limiting the number of new admissions due to staffing vacancies or shortages.  Another recent survey of Home and Community Based Service providers showed that all 50 states were experiencing home care worker shortages, and 43 states reported that some HCBS provider groups have closed due to worker shortages,” says the fact sheet.

Addressing the cause

By improving compensation, benefits, and support systems, S.4120  would ensure the United States has a “strong, qualified pipeline of workers to provide desperately needed care for older adults and people with disabilities.” notes a statement announcing the introduction of Casey’s legislative proposal.  

Specifically, S. 4120 would increase the number of direct care professionals, especially in rural communities.  It also would provide pathways to enter and be supported in the workforce for women, people of color, and people with disabilities.

S. 4120 would also improve wage compensation for direct care professionals to reduce vacancies and turnover.  It ensures that direct care professionals are treated with respect, provided with a safe working environment, protected from exploitation, and provided fair compensation.

The legislative proposal also documents the need for long-term care, identify effective recruitment and training strategies, and promote practices that help retain direct care professionals. It also would strengthen the direct care professional workforce in order to support the 53,000,000 unpaid family caregivers who are providing complex services to their loved ones in the home and across long-term care settings.

At press time, S. 4120 is endorsed by 50 organizations, including Domestic Workers Alliance, SEIU, AFSCME, Caring Across Generations, National Coalition on Aging (NCOA), Justice in Aging, National Partnership for Women & Families, National Council on Independent Living (NCIL), and the National Disability Rights Network (NDRN).

And a companion legislative proposal was introduced in the House by Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (D-MI).

Senate Aging Committee puts spotlight on Direct Care Staffing Shortage 

The April 16th hearing entitled, “The Long-Term Care Workforce: Addressing Shortages and Improving the Profession,” examined the challenges currently facing long-term care workers who are often underpaid and overworked, leading to widespread worker shortages that threaten the availability of care for those who need it.  

“It’s a crisis that stems largely from a lack of support for and investment in our caregiving workforce,” warns Casey in his opening statement. “Between 50 to over 90 percent of long-term care settings and providers report significant staffing shortages, affecting their ability to provide services, accept new clients, or even to remain open,” he says.

Casey noted that many direct care professionals have to work multiple jobs or overtime just to be able to support themselves and their families.  In 2022, their medium wage was just above $15 dollars an hour, well below what is paid for warehouse and convenience store jobs, per Casey.

“The direct care workforce, the majority of whom are women of color, are more likely to live in poverty compared to the general public,” notes Casey.

“Cumbersome federal regulations, requirements, and protections” and a “one-size fits all approach” won’t fix the direct care staffing shortage, responds Ranking Member Mike Braun (R-IN).

“To grow the long-term care workforce, the federal government should make it easier for people to enter by removing barriers,” says Braun, in his opening statement, calling for “productive approaches to build and grow the care professions.”

Overworked and not enough money

Nicholas Smith, a direct support professional at SPIN, a Pennsylvania-based organization that provides lifespan services for over 3,000 people with intellectual disabilities and autism, came to testify. “I work nearly 65-70 hours a week… due to my work, I have missed family events, nieces’ and nephews’ recitals, and school functions… a lot of people are leaving this field to make more money,” said the Philadelphia resident who has worked in the long-term care industry for over 25 years.

According to Smith, the national average for direct service professional wages is only $15.43 in long-term care. “We spend time training new hires only to lose them because they cannot make a living wage,” he says, noting that other industries are offering more money.

“While people want to stay in this field, they cannot make ends meet. Pennsylvania has a long waitlist for home and community-based services, and this is due to the workforce crisis,” he says.

In her testimony, Brooke Vogleman, a licensed Practical Nurse with Huntington, Indiana based TLC Management, stated:  “I’ve seen what happens when long-term care facilities lack workers, resources and government support, like during the pandemic. Many of my colleagues got burned out and left the profession, forcing facilities to rely on costly temporary staffing agencies.”

Vogleman called on federal policy makers, including members of the Senate Aging Committee, to address the challenge through “targeted investments, not blanket mandates.”  

For instance, she told the Senators that LPNs are integral to the facility’s interdisciplinary team. “Staffing mandates that do not include our contributions to patient care or recognize us as nurses are very concerning to me and will have unintended consequences on residents,” she says.

Staffing mandates will force facilities to depend more on expensive staffing agencies, warns Vogleman. “Personally, I’m concerned they will actually increase staff burnout, as current caregivers will be stretched thin and working longer hours in order to comply with these impossible standards,” she says.

Matthew Connell, Ed.D., of Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, came to share the work and achievements of his community college in addressing the shortage of healthcare and long-term care workers in Indiana.

According to Connell, serving more than 190,000 students at 19 campuses and 26 satellite locations as well as on-line, graduates more associate level nurses in Indiana.  Nearly half of these students are pursuing college credit while in high school. Ivy Tech is the nation’s single largest provider of dual credit.

Ivy Tech’s programs are especially designed to help graduates enter the workforce quickly and provide critical services for the state’s long-term care population at a tuition rate that is the lowest in the state, he notes. “One in three Registered Nurses [in Indiana] is an alum. More than 90% of its nursing graduates choose to remain in Indiana, working in hospitals and care settings,” he adds.

The last witness, Jasmine L. Travers, assistant professor at New York University’s College of Nursing,  concisely summed up how to fix the nursing shortage.  She suggested: “To improve access to and quality of long-term are, we must ensure that all direct care workers receive a living wage, a safe, respectful work environment, opportunities for advancement, adequate training, and accessible benefits to maintain their health and well-being.  Only when we recognize that these workers are critically important, hardworking processionals, can we begin to improve equity and health outcomes for staff and patients alike.”

Putting the spotlight on Rhode Island’s Direct Care Staffing Shortage

According to John E. Gage, MBA, NHA, President & CEO, of the Rhode Island Health Care Association (RIHCA), the Covid-19 pandemic had a dramatic impact on the healthcare sector across the country and especially in Rhode Island, and a disproportionate impact on nursing facilities. On a national level, in February 2020 nursing facilities workforce totaled 1,587,000. Today, it is 1,462,800, down by 124,200 or 7.8%. In Rhode Island, it is more dramatic. Pre-pandemic RI nursing facility workforce was 9,797 (2/2020). Current BLS data shows the most recent number of workers in RI nursing facilities is 8,300 – down 1,497 workers or 15.3%.  This is just about double the rate of loss of workers post-pandemic in RI compared to the national statistics.

“There are some local efforts to attract workers back to RI nursing homes,” says Gage, noting that there is a need to be laser-focused on workforce development efforts. 

Gage calls for RI Medicaid to increase reimbursements to nursing facilities to cover today’s actual cost of care, not on facility costs from 2011 (13 years ago!) with minimal average inflationary increases in the 11 years since the price-based reimbursement methodology began in 2013.  According to Gage, RI nursing facilities need an adequate, sustainable reimbursement system to foster continued high-quality care and services and provide nursing home with rates that enable them to retain current workers and recruit more caregivers.

RIHCA, a non-profit trade association representing more than 80 percent of the nursing homes in the state, and its parent organization, the American Health Care Association (AHCA) support the legislative efforts of Senator Casey’s Long-Term Care Support Act. “We support all efforts to increase Medicaid rates to enable facilities to regain and grow their workforce – both direct care and ancillary staff, to enhance the quality of care and quality of life for our nation’s and RI’s most frail elder citizens today and for the years ahead,” he says. 

“It is heartening to see the Senate Committee on Aging and leading members of Congress addressing the care worker crisis in long term care including supporting our many thousands of unpaid caregivers who provide a significant portion of long term supports and services,” says Maureen Maigret, policy advisory of the Senior Agenda of RI (SACRI). Multifaceted solutions are needed, adds Maigret that include supporting training programs for nurses and paraprofessionals, career ladders and providing adequate Medicaid provider payments as Medicaid is the primary payer for long term care.

According to Maigret, in homecare alone, 75% of persons referred for subsidized home and community care through the state Medicaid or the Office of Healthy Aging Home Cost Share program are waiting two months, and often longer, to get services. “Our nursing homes are challenged to recruit the nursing staff needed to provide resident-centered quality care. Federal funding during the pandemic brought some funding in to support worker wages but that funding has ended,” she says.

“The state Healthcare Workforce Initiative led by the Executive Office of Health and Human Services and the Department of Labor has been looking at needs across the healthcare system and addressing some of the training and education issues,” says Maigret, noting that advocacy groups, such as the SACRI, support the Medicaid reimbursement rate increases as recommended by the Office of the Health Insurance Commissioner. “These rate increases are necessary to reduce service wait lists and provide livable wages for direct care staff many of whom are women and women of color,” she says. 

Over 23 years ago, in his weekly commentaries in the Pawtucket Times, this writer reported on the crisis of a direct care staffing shortage and inadequate reimbursement being paid to  nursing facilities to care for Rhode Island’s fail seniors. Isn’t it finally time for the Rhode Island General Assembly to come up with the necessary funds and strategy to fix these problem once and for all?

To watch the Senate Aging Committee hearing held on April 16, 2024, go to https://www.aging.senate.gov/hearings/the-long-term-care-workforce-addressing-shortages-and-improving-the-profession

Will Magaziner fulfill call to reestablish House Aging Committee? 

Published in RINewsToday on October 9, 2023

With Congressman David Cicilline retiring from Congress, no House lawmaker has yet stepped up to reintroduce, H.R. 583,  the Rhode Island lawmaker’s resolution to reestablish the House Select Committee on Aging (HSCoA).  Without receiving a vote in the House Rules Committee at the end of the 117th Congress, the resolution was considered “dead.” On his way out Cicilline was not successful in passing the legislative baton and finding a new original sponsor. 

The resolution to approve the initial HSCoA was passed on October 8, 1974, by a large margin (299–44) in the House. Its legislative duties expired in 1992 during the 103rd Congress, as the House leadership was under pressure to reduce its internal costs to save $1.5 million and to streamline the legislative process. 

On May 26, 2016, Cicilline began his legislative efforts to bring back the HSCoA.  The simple resolution, consisting of 245 words, would authorize the Select Committee to study the use of all practicable means and methods of encouraging the development of public and private programs and policies which will assist seniors in taking a full part in national life and which will encourage the utilization of the knowledge, skills, special aptitudes, and abilities of seniors to contribute to a better quality of life for all Americans.

HSCoA would not craft legislative proposals, but hold investigative hearings to put the Congressional spotlight on aging issues. Its purpose was to push for legislation and other legislative actions, working closely with standing committees, through regular committee channels. 

According to the Congressional Research Service, it would be relatively simple to create a select committee by approving a simple resolution that contains language establishing the committee—giving a purpose, defining membership, and detailing other issues that need to be address.  Salaries and expenses of standing committees, special and select, are authorized through the Legislative Branch Appropriations bill. 

Once introduced, the resolution would be referred to the House Rules Committee for consideration.  If passed, it would be scheduled for a floor vote.  If passed, no Senate action or Presidential signature would be required.

The fourth time’s not the charm

Over eight years (during four Congressional Sessions), Cicilline was unsuccessful in getting the support of either the Republican or Democratic House Speakers to pass his resolution. During the 114th Congress Cicilline began his legislative push to bring back the HSCoA by introducing H. Res. 758.  Twenty-eight Democratic lawmakers out of 435 House members (with no Republican supporting) became cosponsors. But it caught the eye of the co-chairs of the Seniors Task Force (later renamed the House Democratic Caucus Task Force on Aging & Families), Congresswomen Doris Matsui (D-CA) and Jan Schakowsky (D-IL). The lawmakers became cosponsors of this resolution.

Correspondence penned by Cicilline to House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) requesting support of H.R. 758 went unanswered.   Without the blessings of the GOP House Speaker, the resolution was not considered in the House Rules Committee and no floor vote scheduled.  

Two years later, with Ryan’s GOP caucus still retaining the control of the House during the 115th Congress, Cicilline’s H. Res. 160 would again not gain legislative traction. At that time only 27 Democratic lawmakers stepped forward to become cosponsors, just like the previous Congressional session, with the resolution not attracting one single GOP lawmaker as a cosponsor.    

For the third time, during the 116th Congress, Cicilline would  introduce H. Res. 821 to resurrect the HSCoA. Even with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi controlling the lower chamber’s legislative agenda, the resolution would not get Rules Committee consideration, again blocking it from reaching the floor for a vote.

Even with House Speaker Pelosi retaining the gavel again during the 117th Congress, Cicilline could not push H. Res 583 to the legislative goal line.  Like Cicilline’s other three attempts, the resolution was referred to the House Committee on Rules for mark-up and vote. Without Pelosi’s blessings and support for passage, like previous attempts, the  resolution died at the end of the Congressional session.   

Cicilline’s efforts drew the support and attention of Max Richtman, President and CEO of the Washington, DC-based National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, who was former Staff Director of the Senate Special Committee on Aging, the Leadership Council of Aging Organizations (representing 66 national aging groups), along with President Nancy Altman of Social Security Works, and Chair of Strengthen Social Security Coalition.   

Robert Weiner, former chief of staff of the HSCoA, Tom Spulak, former staff director and General Counsel of the House Rules Committee, and Vin Marzullo, a well-known aging advocate in Rhode Island, were strong advocates for the resolution’s passage.

It’s a no-brainer not to bring back HSCoA

Weiner, the President of Robert Weiner Associates News, who was a close friend and confidant of Claude Pepper, clearly knew the importance Cicilline’s efforts to bring back the HSCoA and its impact on the quality of life of America’s seniors.  Weiner, who served as Staff Director for the Subcommittee on Health and Long-term care from 1975 to 1977 and Chief of Staff of the full Aging Committee, from 1976 to 1980, remembered how the late Congressman Claude Pepper used the Select Committee as a force to push Congress to tackle aging issues.

“Bringing it back would be immeasurably helpful regardless of which party has the White House or controls Congress in assuring the best health care programs for seniors,” says Weiner. 

Weiner says that the HSCoA successfully prodded Congress to abolish forced retirement, investigate nursing home abuses, monitor breast cancer screening for older women, improve elderly housing, and bring more attention to elder abuse by publishing a number of reports, including “Elder Abuse: An Examination of a Hidden Problem and Elder Abuse: A National Disgrace,” and “Elder Abuse: A Decade of Shame and Inaction.” The Committee’s work would also lead to increased home care benefits for the aging and establishing research and care centers for Alzheimer’s Disease, he said.

“One of the best-known aging accomplishments of Claude Pepper was to end mandatory retirement by amending the Age Discrimination in Employment Act,” adds Weiner, noting that with HSCoA support the bill passed 359 to 2 in the House and 89 to 10 in the Senate, with President Jimmy Carter signing the bill into law despite strong opposition of the Business Roundtable and big labor.

Weiner noted that among the HSCoA’s other legislative achievements was supporting the passage of legislation creating standards for supplemental insurance and holding hearings to expose cancer insurance duplication. “Witnesses were literally forced to wear paper bags over their heads to avoid harassment by the insurance companies. That legislation became law,” he said.

According to Weiner, “Republican lawmakers just didn’t want to support Cicilline’s resolution to reauthorize the HSCoA,” says Weiner, despite the fact that Congressman John Heinz  (R-Pa.), later a renowned Senator, was an original prime sponsor of the House resolution that would initially establish the select committee. 

Seniors are now the most powerful voting block who would see the need, like Heinz, for a HSCoA, especially to protect Social Security, Medicare and other federal aging programs, says Weiner.  Republican House lawmakers are threatening to cut Social Security benefits and raise the full-time retirement age, he warns, calling their actions “reforms.” “But the program is actually solvent, with trillions in surplus beneficiaries paid for as the Pepper-Reagan original deal provided,” he notes. 

If HSCoA resolution is passed during the 118th Congress, the Republicans would control its legislative agenda.  Historically, the House select committee allowed open, bipartisan debate from different ideological perspectives to promote bipartisan consensus that, in turn, would facilitate the critical policy work of the standing committees.

Passing the torch

Who will ultimately pick up the legislative baton from Cicilline to become Rhode Island’s fiery aging advocate.  Will it be Congressman Seth Magaziner, or the newly elected Congressman from Rhode Island’s Congressional District 1 to step to the plate?

Why shouldn’t Magaziner or Cicilline’s replacement follow in the footsteps of former Rhode Island Congressman John E. Fogarty (dec.) and be the original sponsor of legislation that will have a major impact on national aging policy.  The lawmaker would become a hero to America’s seniors.  The White House Conference on Aging was the result of legislation successfully sponsored by Fogarty, and led to the enactment of his bill to establish an Administration of Aging in the Department of Health, Education and Welfare.  He was the original sponsor of legislation that established the Older Americans Act of 1965.

But even if a Rhode Island Congressman makes a decision to become the original sponsor to Cicilline’s resolution that reestablishes the HSCoA, passing this resolution in a GOP-controlled House will require support from that caucus. 

Congressmen Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), co-chairs of the “Problem Solvers Caucus,” consisting of essentially an equal number of 63 Republican and Democratic lawmakers, may well be the way to finally pass a resolution to reestablish the HSCoA. 

Weiner, who would later become a senior staffer to both the Clinton and Bush White Houses and now is a national columnist and winner of the National Press Club President’s Award for recruiting young journalists, agrees that it is now time to bring the Problem Solvers Caucus to the forefront to endorse and together have a bipartisan House support push for reestablishing the HSCoA.  “The Aging Committee has always been bipartisan, with leaders including not only Pepper and Ed Roybal as chairs, but supportive ranking minority members including then House members — later Senators — Chuck Grassley, Bill Cohen, and John Heinz.

Republican Study Committee, Social Security and Medicare

Published in RINewsToday on July 3, 2023

Last month, the Republican Study Committee (RSC) unveiled its 167-page FY 2024 “Protecting America’s Economic Security” budget proposal which calls for balancing the federal budget in seven years, slashes $16.3 trillion in wasteful government spending over ten years, and cuts $5.1 trillion in taxes. During the 118th Congress (2023 to 2024), 175 House Republican lawmakers from 38 states are RSC members. With over 70 percent of the House Republicans belonging to the RSC, the release of the proposed budget is a dependable indicator of where the chamber’s caucus stands on key legislative priorities.

The RSC annually releases its own budget proposal for the next fiscal year during the time when both House and Senate Budget Committees prepare official budget resolutions. The fiscal blueprint provides the House Republican Caucus with an opportunity to detail its wish list of spending priorities and also provides its position on social issues.

RSC’s FY 2024 budget, released on June 14, 2023, is made up of 220 individual legislative proposals and initiatives received from its members. Reflecting GOP values, the proposed budget would eliminate most funding for new abortion policies, Critical Race Theory, and “gender politics” initiatives, while ensuring adequate funding for the military, continued construction of a Southern border wall; rolling back “climate change” programs, and eliminating increases in funding for the IRS. It would also make 2017 tax cuts permanent as its provisions are starting to expire soon, and ensuring the nation’s energy independence; providing tax benefits to promote R&D: restricting free meals for students, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, with the possibility of work/volunteer requirements.  

Aging groups are concerned that the RSC budget also takes aim at Social Security and Medicare programs. During 2023, the annual Social Security trust fund report warned that the program will only be able to continue paying out full benefits through 2034. The Medicare trust fund also reported that it could run low on funds by 2028, two years later than reported last year. While the Democratic platform seeks to raise caps on some programs to address this, the RSC’s budget proposal floated additional policies to financially fix these programs.

The RSC budget proposes “modest changes” to benefits for those who are not near full retirement age. For future retirees, it calls for raising the full retirement age (taking into account for increases in life expectancy) from age 67 to age 69 for those who turn 63 in 2033. It would also reduce benefits for future beneficiaries who earned a “higher salary” before retirement. Also, only “modest adjustments” to the Social Security program as it operates would be made but it doesn’t clarify the changes.   

As to Medicare, the RSC budget calls for requiring disabled people to wait longer before they can receive Medicare benefits. It pushes for turning Medicare into a “premium support system,” where seniors would receive a subsidy to be used to purchase private health plans competing against traditional Medicare.

Point/Counter Point

With the release of RSC’s budget, House lawmakers, the White House, and aging groups quickly issued statements touting their own positions. 

RSC’s Chairman Kevin Hern (R-Ok) noted the GOP’s conservative values could be found on every page of the budget blueprint. “Our budget proves that fiscal responsibility is the only way to lower inflation, grow the economy, cut federal spending, empower taxpayers, and protect small businesses. Congress controls the purse strings, but we, the House, has failed to produce a budget year after year after year. Everyone has to balance their budget – governors, mayors, businesses, families – but not Congress. Nearly every problem facing our government can be traced back to our failure to both pass a budget and stick to it. The Republican Study Committee has a budget, and it balances in just seven years. Our budget is real, and it’s floor-ready. It’s time to get our country back on track,” he said.

“For too long, irresponsible spending habits in Washington have made the cost-of-living more expensive for hardworking American families, and they are fed up with business-as-usual. The RSC budget prioritizes smart, common-sense policy to empower the American worker, and it cuts back on wasteful spending to pay for what’s important – just like families have to do every day. We are committed to protecting our country’s economic security and restoring fiscal sanity to our Nation’s finances,” says RSC Budget and Spending Task Force Ben Cline (R-VA).

On the other hand, Pennsylvania Congressman Brendan F. Boyle, Ranking Member of the House Budget Committee, gives the RSC the thumbs down: “This budget stands in stark contrast to the positive, hopeful vision put forward by President Biden and supported by House Democrats: a government that works for working families, an economy where the ultra-rich pay their fair share, and a country where everyone has the freedom to retire with dignity. I look forward to working with President Biden and Congressional Democrats to ensure House Republicans’ bleak vision for America does not become our reality.”

Social Security and Medicare

Social Security advocacy groups warn that the programs proposed by the RSC would slash the nation’s safety net programs, like Social Security and Medicare.

“This budget would destroy Social Security as we know it. It would raise the retirement age and slash middle class benefits. These changes would transform Social Security from an earned insurance benefit, which replaces wages lost in old age, disability, or death, into a subsistence-level welfare benefit,” warns Nancy Altman, President of Social Security Works.

“The budget fearmongers about Social Security’s modest shortfall (still a decade away) rules out any options for raising revenue, such as requiring billionaires to contribute more. That leaves benefit cuts as the only “solution.” In other words, they want to cut benefits now to avoid cutting them later, which isn’t a solution at all. Indeed, the budget will increase the number of workers who will have no ability to retire while maintaining their standard of living,” says Altman.

“A particularly cruel provision would force disability beneficiaries to wait five long years (instead of the current two, which is already too long) before becoming eligible for Medicare benefits. Outrageously, this change would deprive some of the most medically vulnerable people in America of health care. This provision alone would inevitably lead to more medical bankruptcies and increased homelessness,” notes Altman. 

Correcting misinformation on Social Security and Medicare

The Washington, DC-based National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare is launching a new public education campaign — sponsored by AARP — to correct misinformation about Social Security and emphasize the program’s value to American workers, especially to communities of color.  The campaign, “Social Security: Here Today, Here Tomorrow,” is intended to debunk myths and give workers the facts about their vital earned benefits.  The campaign includes a series of public town halls across the U.S. between June and October, 2023,  featuring prominent Social Security experts and advocates, Social Security officials, and financial advisors.

Max Richtman, President and CEO of the National Committee to Protected Social Security and Medicare says, “There is a ‘doom and gloom’ narrative about Social Security today. ‘The program is going bankrupt.’ ‘It won’t be there for future generations.’ ‘Politicians are stealing from Social Security.’ None of that is true. We want the public to understand that Social Security is there for them today — and it will be there for them tomorrow. And not just in retirement, but in case of disability, the death of a family breadwinner, or the retirement of a spouse. That’s what this campaign is all about.” Richtman will moderate some of the upcoming town halls.

“Social Security is a financial lifeline to millions of American seniors, but it is especially crucial to the Black community.  Black Americans traditionally rely on Social Security for monthly income more than other groups do, due to wage and job discrimination, diminishing employer-provided pensions, and challenges in saving for retirement. “Like all Americans, the Black community pays into Social Security with every paycheck — and deserves to know that the government will keep its promise to provide baseline financial security when they encounter what President Franklin Roosevelt called ‘the hazards and vicissitudes’ of life,” says Richtman.

Here is a schedule of the town halls. Admission is free. Reservations are required.

Philadelphia, PA, July 26, 2023 at Center In The Park

Lansing, MI, August 28, 2023 at AARP Michigan Office (To be televised later on WLAJ-TV/ABC)

Milwaukee, WI, September, 2023 (date & location TBA)

Las Vegas, NV, October, 2023 (date & location TBA)

Visit www.socialsecurityheretoday.org for registration information. Those unable to attend the free town halls in person will be able to watch live video streams.

Here is the text for the RSC’s FY 2024 Budget, Protecting America’s Economic Security: https://hern.house.govPuploadedfiles/202306141135_fy24_rsc_budget_print_final_c.pdf

House GOP leadership is committed to holding a vote to approve the RSC budget this year.  With a razor thin majority in the House and with Democrats stringing opposing, the RSC budget is unlikely to pass the lower chamber. 

In an interview with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy that aired Sunday, Jan. 29, 2023, on “Face the Nation,” McCarthy stated, “Medicare and Medicaid slashes are off the table.”  But with three fourths of the House GOP caucus endorsing the RSC budget, making cuts to Social Security and Medicare, older voters must make it clear to their House lawmaker, “Don’t touch Social Security and Medicare.”