Tag Archives for U.S. Senator Jack Reed

Cap on out— of-pocket costs for Medicare drug plan enrollees coming soon

Published in RINewsToday on September 2, 2024 

Back on Aug. 16th in 2022, President Joe Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), it’s enactment lowering the health cost for millions of older Americans by lowering the high cost of prescription drugs by granting Medicare the power to directly negotiate drug prices with drug companies.  Rising drug costs were forcing some Medicare beneficiaries to cut their expenses by not filling a prescription or even skipping doses. This could lead to complications and side effects resulting in hospitalization, even death.

“AARP was instrumental in Congress passing the prescription drug law of 2022 to lower prices and out-of-pocket costs for Medicare enrollees,” said Jo Ann Jenkins, CEO of AARP in an Aug. 28 statement announcing the release of AARP’s new report. “As we approach January 2025, we want every senior in America to know that, thanks to the new annual cap which limits their out-of-pocket costs, they will have more money to invest in their families, spend on their broader health needs or simply save to achieve greater financial stability.”

Virtual Media Briefing Details Impact on IRA law

Last week, the Washington, DC-based AARP briefed the media on the state-level impact of the historic new federal protection for 56 million Medicare drug plan enrollees. The new law caps out-of-pocket prescription drug costs every year, beginning at $2,000 in January 2025. 

The nine-page Public Policy Institute report, released at the virtual media briefing, analyzes the number of enrollees (not receiving the Medicare low-income subsidy) that will benefit from the new cap by state, age, gender, and race between 2025 and 2029.

Nancy LeaMond, the chief advocacy and engagement officer for AARP, say putting the brakes to spiraling drug cost by enacting the IRA put money back into the pockets of millions of America’s retirees purchasing pharmaceuticals for their medical conditions. “Upwards of 95% of Americans, age 65 and older, have at least one chronic condition and close to 80% are dealing with 2 or more chronic conditions,” says LeaMond, like diabetes and heart disease, to debilitating neurological diseases like Parkinson’s and Ms.

“Prescription drugs are a lifeline, said LeaMond, stressing that medicine is only effective if you have the money to pay for it. The passage of IRA two years ago is already having a significant and positive impact on millions of Medicare beneficiaries who now don’t pay more than $35 a month for insulin and get free vaccines for things like shingles,” she noted. 

“There are even bigger savings coming down the pike, starting in January 2025. The total amount that folks enrolled in Medicare drug plans pay out of pocket for their prescriptions will be capped at $2,000 a year,” reports LeaMond.  

During the media briefing, Leigh Purvis, Prescription Drug Policy Principal, AARP Public Policy Institute, stated “one of the biggest challenges in the original Medicare Part D benefit was the lack of a cap on out-of-pocket spending.”  Even after reaching a certain limit, Medicare beneficiaries were still required to pay 5% of their drug costs, with no limit for those on expensive Medications, she said.

According to Purvis, out of pocket expenses could exceed $10,000 per year, “an unmanageable amount for anyone, but especially for a population with a Median annual income of $36,000. Because of this, AARP pushed for the inclusion of a cap on out-of-pocket spending for Medicare Part D, to be included in the IRA, she said.  And it was…

Purvis noted that 3 million Part D beneficiaries (who don’t receive the Medicare Part D low-income subsidy are expected to benefit from the $2,000 cap in 2025.  This number is expected to grow to over 4 million by 2029.  These Medicare drug plan enrollees would see average savings of roughly $1,100, or 56%, in 2025 for their prescription drugs. 

Purvis also gave a few other takeaways from the report.  On average,  approximately 1.4 million (40 percent) Medicare drug plan enrollees who reach the new out-of-pocket cap between 2025 and 2029 are estimated to see annual savings of $1,000 or more, and just over 420,000 (12 percent) will see savings of more than $3,000.  In addition, more than three-quarters of Medicare drug plan enrollees who will benefit in 2025 are between the ages of 65 and 84.

Finally, Paula Cunningham, AARP Michigan State Director (discussing  results of a state survey) and Diana Devito , who has lived with chronic lymphocytic leukemia for over 19 years, participated in the media briefing. Both reinforced  how the report’s numbers aren’t just statistics, they represent real people “who are being forced to make impossible choices.” 

Cunningham told a “heartbreak” story about a woman who had lost her husband, and she had to sell her wedding ring in order to pay for her prescription drugs. “She’s now deceased, but I will never forget her story, or the stories of people across this great state that we met who had to make difficult choices between paying rent or buying groceries to pay for their medications,” she said.

After experiencing the high prescription costs for treating life-threatening chronic disorder, Devito came to share how important a $2,000 cap can be “for people like me.”  She said, “It’s a real-life changer,” noting that everyone doesn’t understand that. “If you’re not taking one of these expensive drugs, you don’t realize the impact that it has on your life,” she added.

On Another Note…

U.S. Senator Jack Reed brings to my attention another Congressional report that details the Rhode Island specific data as to the impact of IRA on older Rhode Islanders.

According to the Congressional Joint Economic Committee (CJEC), this year, about 57,000 Rhode Island Medicare beneficiaries will save an average of roughly $200 each year because of IRA’s improvement to the Medicare Part D drug coverage. By 2025 this number would increase to 68,000 retirees, saving them an annual average of $340 on prescription drugs.

By allowing Medicare to negotiate with drug companies to bargain down the high cost of many lifesaving drugs, 29,000 retirees use drugs that are with the new negotiated prices, says the CJEC report.

For a copy of AARP Public Policy Institute’s Medicare Part D Out-of-Pocket Spending Cap, go to https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/health/prescription-drugs/medicare-part-d-out-of-pocket-spending-cap-prescription-drug-costs/.

To learn more about AARP’s work to lower prescription drug prices, visit https://www.aarp.org/politics-society/advocacy/prescription-drugs/.

For a copy of CJEC’s report, go to https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/356ae3d2-af5e-4d32-bd42-fafc548173c5/ri-cost-savings-fact-sheet.pdf

For details how the IRA impacts older Rhode Island retirees, go to https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rhode-Island-Health-Care.pdf

Obama’s Budget DOA, Thanks to GOP Gridlock

Published in the Woonsocket Call on February 14, 2016

With a GOP-controlled Congress President Obama’s final budget arrives “dead on arrival” on Capitol Hill.  The 182-page 2017 Fiscal Year budget, submitted on February 9, detailing $4.1 trillion in federal spending, which starts October 1, seems to be not worth the paper it’s written on.

Obama, a “lame duck” president in his last term, will not get his day in court.  Since the 1970s, a long-standing political tradition has brought the Office of Management and Budget Director and other senior administration officials, to present the president’s entire budget to Congress.  However, the Chairs of the House and Senate budget committees snubbed the Democratic President by issuing a joint statement saying, there will be no hearings before their panels this year. Sadly, political gridlock, fostered GOP Senate and House leadership, still seems to be alive and well on Capitol Hill.

Crafting the budget proposal now is in the hands of a very conservative Congress. But there a positives in Obama’s budget proposal, provisions that hopefully be placed in an enacted budget.

Obama’s budget proposal makes critical investments to fund domestic and national security priorities while adhering to the bipartisan budget agreement signed into law last fall.  It lifts sequestration in future years.  The budget proposal also attempts to drive down the federal deficit through smart savings from health care, immigration, and tax the wealthy and banks.

The Budget also seeks to tackle a multitude of domestic issues including confronting climate change, finding new clinical treatments for attacking cancer, advancing biomedical research, fighting infectious diseases, protecting the nation’s water supply and fostering clean energy initiatives, ratcheting up military readiness, revitalizing the American manufacturing sector, and funding job training and education initiatives.

Obama’s Final Budget and Seniors

But Obama’s 2017 Fiscal Year Budget has a number of budget provisions that directly impact older Americans, too.

According to  President and CEO Max Richtman, of the Washington, D.C.-based National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, like last year’s Obama recently released budget proposal proposes no changes in the way Social Security benefits are determined which is “good news for seniors.”

Richtman says that his aging organization worked tirelessly to make sure the FY 2017 budget did not include any Social Security proposals that would negatively impact benefits for current or future beneficiaries.  He notes, “The new budget proposes a substantial increase in the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) budget — $13.067 billion for SSA’s FY 2017 appropriation for administrative funding.  This is a $905 million, or 7.44 percent, increase over the FY 2016 enacted level.”

Finally, Obama’s newly released budget helps SSA to improve customer service for those applying for SSA and/or disability benefits by hiring additional front-line employees for its teleservice centers and local offices as well as additional staff to reduce the backlog of disability applications that have accumulated in SSA’s hearing offices, he says.

NCPSSM also applauded the President’s budget proposal for allowing Medicare to negotiate for lower prescription drug prices.

Richtman observed it has taken Congress a long time to acknowledge that the high cost of prescription drugs has hit older American’s hard in their wallets.  “Medicare spends billions providing Part D drug coverage each year while beneficiaries including seniors, the disabled and their families also face rising out-of-pocket costs and higher premiums, he says, noting that “All the while, drug makers continue to reap the profits of their price gouging.”

In his budget proposal Obama has again proposed lifting the ban preventing Medicare from negotiating prices with the drug companies, notes Richtman, warning that “Big Pharma has lobbied hard to keep the ban in place but seniors expect, this time, Congress will do the right thing and finally allow Medicare to negotiate for fair prices.”

Richtman says there are other budget provisions that benefit the nation’s seniors.  Specifically, the closing the Part D donut hole two years earlier, additional funding for in-home services, and reforms for overpayments going to private insurers in Medicare Advantage.

Meanwhile, the President’s budget was not all good news, adds Richtman, noting that “Once again, the budget proposes shifting even more healthcare costs to seniors by extending Medicare means-testing to the middle class and increasing out-of-pocket costs such as the home health care copayment and the Part B deductible.”

The President’s new funding request also targets vulnerable older Americans, by increasing funding from the 2016 Fiscal year Budget.  The President has increased last year’s budget by more than $10 million in discretionary resources for supportive services, also increasing the Congregate and Home-Delivered Nutrition Programs (like Meals on Wheels) by $14 million.  The Aging and Disability Resource Centers is also given a $2 million increase.

Other programs benefit from Obama’s budget proposal, too.  Elder Justice Initiative and Lifespan Respite Care Programs each would receive $2 increases from last year.  The Commodity Supplemental Food Program would get $14 million more.   The budget proposal also puts $10 million in for a new initiative to improve senior access to the Supplement Nutrition Assistance Program.  Section 202 Housing for the Elderly also gives a bump from last year in the tune of $72 million.

But the budget request slashes funding for programs that serve low-income seniors, specifically the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Programs and the Community Development Block Grant takes huge fiscal hits.

Views from the Side Line 

             Obama’s budget proposal preserves programs for seniors, funding Social Security and Medicare, says Darrell M. West, Ph.D., Vice President and Director of Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution, “Not many Republicans are taking this budget very seriously as they plan to write their own budget. The GOP alternative likely is going to include changes to programs affecting senior citizens, he warns.

Rhode Island’s Congressional delegation weighs in on the looming heated partisan budget debate where law makers will be toeing the part line.

Congressman David Cicilline, notes that he is disappointed that the House Budget Committee will not ‎holding hearings on President Obama’s budget proposal. “We should be discussing ways to strengthen Social Security, preserve Medicare, and ensure retirement security for every American. Unfortunately, it’s clear that House Republicans don’t want to have this discussion,” he says.

U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse weighed in on the brewing pre-election budget battle.  “I’m pleased to see that the President’s budget protects Social Security and Medicare from the cuts sought by many Republicans.  As the President has proposed, we should reduce the deficit by closing wasteful tax loopholes, not by compromising the programs essential to our seniors, and not after saving Rhode Island seniors $14.4 million in prescription costs thanks to the Affordable Care Act.”

Finally, U.S. Senator Jack Reed notes that the President’s budget proposal reflects a number of his ongoing efforts to support Rhode Island seniors.  “This budget blueprint proposes significant investments in the health and well-being of aging Americans, and I will work hard to champion these proposals as we work through the appropriations process this year, he says.

“I am particularly glad the President heeded my call to propose meaningful steps towards lowering the cost of prescription drugs, which is critical for middle class families,” adds the Senator.

Now the work begins as Congress starts to craft it’s 2017 Fiscal Year Budget.  Democratic Congressional lawmakers can glean and fight for provisions in Obama’s eighth and final budget that positively benefit older Americans. With Senator Reed, sitting on the Senate Appropriations Committee, the Rhode Island’s Senior Senator and the state’s Congressional Delegation will play a major role in shaping the nation’s future aging programs and services.

 

Delegates Reject Bush’s Policies

Published in Senior Digest on January 2006

President George Bush and congressional Republican leaders supporting Social Security reform through private savings accounts, saw their policy soundly rejected at the White House Conference on Aging (WHCoA) held last month in Washington, D.C.

According to AARP State Director Kathleen Connell, who was appointed to the Rhode Island WHCoA delegation by U.S. Sen. Jack Reed, Bush’s private sector approach to Social Security reform got a big thumbs down.

The president also took a hit on his new Medicare prescription drug benefit program, which offers insurance coverage through the private sector. Delegates voted for a strategy that calls for replacing the new Medicare drug benefit with a government-run program.

By the end of the fifth WHCoA, 50 resolutions dealing with a variety of policy issues were approved by the 1,200 delegates. Most of the top 10 resolutions concern the need to create a comprehensive national strategy to address the long-term care of the nation’s frailest and most vulnerable seniors.

While the delegates took a couple of swings at Bush, the president made an obvious political snub when he failed to appear at the four-day conference and sent Health and Human Services Secretary Michael O. Leavitt, as a replacement. That goes in the record books as the first time a president was no-show at the national aging conference, held every decade since 1962.  Presidents John Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton did make a showing to welcome the delegates.

Moya Thompson, WHCoA deputy director for outreach, stated the conference’s Policy Committee had initially approved 73 resolutions, sharing them with the 1,200 delegates before they arrived in Washington.  Thompson said that three voting sessions were scheduled at the beginning of the WHCoA, with each delegate having an opportunity to vote once to choose their top 50 resolutions. The 50 resolutions that received the most votes were presented at the conference.

According to Thompson, 56 implementation strategy workshops, at least one for each of the 50 resolutions, were held. By law, the resolutions must be delivered to the president and Congress six months after conference, Thompson said.

Counnell said many of the delegates felt that the WHCoA agenda was controlled too much by the Policy Committee appointed by the Bush administration and the Republican-controlled Congress. “This was very visible to those attending,” she said.

Another organizational issue, Connell said, was concern over the Policy Committee not allowing delegates to submit resolutions for a vote in addition to the selected 73. At previous conferences, she said, additional resolutions could be considered if petitioned by 10 percent of the delegates.

Connell said that the Rhode Island delegates were a very cohesive group. “Everybody was on the same page in advocating for issues. Given the size of our delegation, we were very effective,” she said.

Corinne Calise Russo, director of the state Department of Elderly Affairs, said she was pleased that the top vote-getting resolution was the reauthorization of the Older Americans Act, a priority of the Rhode Island delegation.

Russo, appointed by Gov. Donald Carcieri as a delegate, said, “Delegates throughout the nation attending the conference felt that the Older Americans Act should be enacted with increased funding for all of the act’s titles, within the first six months following the end of the conference.”

Ensuring older Americans have transportation options to maintain  their mobility and independence was another resolution that received strong support, Russo said, stressing the importance of keeping seniors independent and driving for as long as possible. She believes the resolution can be implemented at the state level by using new signage on highways, making lane markings extremely visible in rain and at night and designing larger and more visible crossing signs at busy intersections.

While older worker issues and affordable housing designed to allow seniors to age in place are in the top 50 resolutions, and are high on Russo’s agenda, she stressed federal and state policy makers must not forget the growing numb er of grandparents who are raising their grandchildren.

“We need to expand our national family caregiver programs funded by the Older Americans Act, to provide more support for older persons taking on this new role,” she said.