Trump’s Big Bill, Big Promises – But a Bust for Seniors

Pubished in Blackstone Valley Call & Times on July 8, 2025

After 48 relentless days of political maneuvering—marked by cajoling, backroom bargaining, strategic threats, and last-minute incentives to win over stubborn holdouts—President Donald Trump finally got his wish: Congress passed his prized “One Big Beautiful Bill” (H.R. 1), which he triumphantly signed into law on July 4, 2025.

On May 22, 2025, the House narrowly approved the sweeping 900-page bill by a vote of 215–214–1. Every House Democrat opposed the measure. Two Republicans, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Warren Davidson (R-OH), joined the opposition, while Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-MD) voted “present.” Two GOP lawmakers did not vote.

What’s In the Bill: Tax Breaks Up, Safety Nets Down

The legislation extends the 2017 individual tax cuts and adds new deductions for tips, overtime pay, auto loan interest, and “Trump Accounts” for children. It raises the SALT deduction cap to $40,000 for five years, increases the child tax credit, imposes a remittance levy, and taxes college endowment income.

On the spending side, H.R. 1 raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, slashes over $1 trillion from Medicaid and Medicare, expands work requirements for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients, and allocates $150 billion each to defense and border enforcement—boosting ICE funding to over $100 billion by 2029.

Senate Republicans spent more than five weeks reviewing the House bill’s provisions to comply with the Byrd Rule, walking a tightrope between deficit hawks and moderates. After a marathon “vote-a-rama” that saw 46 amendment votes (only six of which passed), the Senate approved the bill 51–50 on July 1, with Vice President J.D. Vance casting the tie-breaking vote.

The reconciliation process allowed the Senate to pass the bill with a simple majority rather than the standard 60-vote threshold. When the bill returned to the House Speaker Mike Johnson and President Trump personally lobbied holdouts, linking support to other legislative priorities and negotiating procedural rules. Early on July 3, the House adopted the Senate version in a 218–214 vote, with only Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Thomas Massie (R-KY) voting with Democrats. The bill was sent to the White House and signed into law the following day.

Despite Republican praise, public reaction to Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” has been largely negative. A KFF Health Tracking Poll found that 64% of Americans view H.R. 1 unfavorably, compared to 35% in support.

President Trump and GOP leaders hailed the bill as a historic conservative win that fulfills “America First” promises—cutting taxes, slashing regulations, boosting border security, promoting energy independence, and reducing federal spending. “This is a major victory for hardworking families,” said Rhode Island GOP Chair Joe Powers in a statement, praising the bill for delivering middle-class tax relief and real border control.

But Congressman Gabe Amo (D-RI), representing Rhode Island’s 1st Congressional District, sees it differently and warns of the devastating consequences to aging programs and services.

“Trump’s big, ugly bill” shows that Republican lawmakers, following Trump’s marching orders, voted for “the largest theft in American history to further enrich the richest among us,” he says.

“Simply put, because of this horrific legislation, Americans will be poorer, sicker, hungrier, and further away from economic opportunity,” says the Rhode Island Congressman.

Deep Cuts and Dire Warnings from Aging Advocates

SACRI Policy Advisor Maureen Maigret emphasized the need for swift action in Rhode Island, stating, “It is crucial for the Secretary of the Executive Office of Health and Human Services to promptly convene the advisory group outlined in Section 8 of the state’s FY 2026 budget bill.”

“For years, SACRI has worked to ensure a balanced system of long-term services—supporting quality nursing home care, expanding access to affordable home and community-based services, and collaborating with the Office of Healthy Aging and other aging advocacy groups to promote healthy aging,” says Maigret.

SACRI, a statewide coalition advocating for older Rhode Islanders, has partnered with other organizations to make significant strides in these areas, according to Executive Director Carol Anne Costa. “We cannot allow this progress to be reversed, especially as older adults are the fastest-growing segment of the state’s population,” Costa says.

“We have sent a letter to Secretary Charest requesting that SACRI be included in the advisory group established by Article 8 of the state’s FY 2026 budget bill.”

Now accounting for nearly 20 percent of the total population, the number of Americans age 65 and older is steadily increasing.

“Make no mistake: this harmful, cold-hearted bill will wreak havoc on our country’s fragile aging services infrastructure—at a time when demand for the Medicare and Medicaid-supported services it delivers is growing,” warns Katie Smith Sloan, president and CEO of LeadingAge.

“This legislation deals a significant blow to a core element of our country’s social safety net: Medicaid,” adds Sloan, emphasizing that the consequences “will not be pretty.”

She further warns, “Due to the level of deficit this bill will create, Medicare payments to providers may be reduced by 4% for the next ten years.”

According to Sloan, the bandaids included in H.R. 1—such as freezing (but not reducing) nursing home provider taxes and creating a rural health transformation fund, both touted as protections for older adults and aging services providers—will soon prove ill-equipped to prevent the bill’s damage. As states begin to grapple with budget shortfalls caused by reduced federal Medicaid contributions, the suffering, she says, will begin.

Max Richtman, President & CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, warned that 16 million Americans may lose health coverage, and millions more could lose access to food assistance. He stressed the bill’s devastating effects on the 7.2 million seniors dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid and the 6.5 million older adults who rely on SNAP benefits.

“These beneficiaries are some of the most vulnerable members of our society — and Republicans have put them at risk in order to pay for another tax cut mainly for the rich,” he says.

AARP: Safety Nets Shredded, Protections Undermined

Although AARP expressed strong opposition to many provisions in the reconciliation bill, the organization did support several key measures. These included increased investment in affordable housing through the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, raising the additional senior standard deduction to $6,000, and expanding the Section 45S tax credit for paid family and medical leave.

Executive Vice President Nancy LeaMond criticized the bill’s cuts to Medicaid, ACA Marketplace coverage, and food assistance, calling them particularly harmful to older adults, rural residents, and family caregivers. She emphasized that over 17 million Americans aged 50 and older rely on Medicaid to remain in their homes and manage chronic health conditions.

“This is a moment to strengthen—not weaken—the supports that help people stay in their homes, access needed health care, and live with dignity and independence,” said LeaMond, representing nearly 38 million members nationwide.

She stressed that AARP remained strongly opposed to Senate provisions that would slash Medicaid, Marketplace coverage, and food assistance, making it harder for older adults to get by.

“More than 17 million Americans age 50 and older rely on Medicaid as a critical safety net to stay in their homes, manage chronic conditions, and afford long-term care,” says LeaMond. “By limiting how states fund their Medicaid programs, the new law threatens health care access—particularly for people in rural and underserved areas and through safety-net providers,” she adds.

LeaMond also expressed concern over delayed implementation of nursing home staffing standards, which are estimated to save 13,000 lives annually, and provisions allowing drug companies to continue charging high prices for certain orphan drugs—even while selling the same medicines overseas at far lower costs.

AARP opposes H.R. 1’s new burdens that could cost people their health care or food assistance when they are unable to work due to age discrimination, caregiving responsibilities, or chronic illness. “This will only make it harder for many older adults to access needed health care and to put food on the table,” she says.

She also warns that the new SNAP cost-sharing formula could shift billions in expenses to state budgets, forcing states to restrict eligibility, reduce benefits, or withdraw from the program entirely.

Finally, AARP strongly opposed the bill’s 10-year moratorium on state and local regulation of artificial intelligence (AI), arguing that it undermines consumer protections in employment, housing, and health care—leaving older adults more vulnerable to harm from biased or untested AI systems.

For additional information on H.R. 1’s impact on senior programs and service, visit: aarp.org/advocacy/fight-senate-cuts-medicaid-snap
aarp.org/advocacy/support-budget-bill-tax-proposals

With the Latest SSA Trustee Report Released, Congress Must Act Now to Fix Social Security

Published in Blackstone Valley Call & Times on June 24, 2025

Just before Medicare celebrates its 60th anniversary this July and Social Security marks its 90th birthday in August, the Social Security Board of Trustees recently released its annual report on the financial status of the Social Security Trust Funds.

According to this year’s estimate, by 2033, projected revenues will only cover 77% of scheduled benefits—unless Congress takes action to address the program’s looming shortfall. Combining the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and Disability Insurance (DI) trust funds would extend coverage for another year, ensuring 81% of scheduled benefits through 2034, instead of 2035, as previously estimated.

The trustees also reported that Medicare’s Hospital Insurance Trust Fund (Medicare Part A, which covers certain healthcare services) will be able to pay full benefits until 2033, a year earlier than the previous estimate of 2024. At that point, the fund is expected to cover 89% of benefits.

For 2024, the Social Security Administration (SSA) paid $1.47 trillion in benefits to about 68 million beneficiaries, while its administrative costs were just $7.4 billion—representing a very low 0.5% of total expenditures. However, the projected 75-year actuarial deficit is 3.82% of taxable payroll, higher than the 3.50% projected in last year’s report.

Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security, stressed that ensuring the financial stability of the trust funds remains a top priority for the Trump Administration. “We must work together—Congress, SSA, and others—to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse to protect and strengthen the trust funds for millions of Americans who rely on it for secure retirement or disability benefits,” he stated.

In responding to the released Trustee’s report, House Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee Ranking Member John B. Larson (D-CT) criticized the current administration’s approach, calling the Trustees’ Report a wake-up call to enhance Social Security for the first time in more than 50 years. Larson also pushed back against misleading claims from President Trump and Elon Musk about waste and abuse within the system. “Seniors, veterans, and disabled workers rely on these earned benefits, and they’re counting on Congress to do its job,” Larson said. “While Republicans push for privatization, Democrats have a plan to protect and expand Social Security.”

Larson’s Social Security 2100 Act, introduced in the last Congress with 189 cosponsors, aims to strengthen Social Security by expanding benefits and increasing payroll taxes to ensure the program’s long-term solvency.

Media Headlines on Social Security’s “Insolvency” Create Unnecessary Fear

Some media outlets, including The Washington Post, have raised alarms with bold headlines warning that Social Security could become “insolvent by 2033” or even “bankrupt.” In a statement, Bob Weiner, former Chief of Staff to the U.S. House Committee on Aging, rejects these claims, noting that the SSA currently holds a $2.7 trillion surplus. According to Weiner, the Trustees’ warning that the program may cover only 81% of benefits by 2034 is being misinterpreted as insolvency or bankruptcy. “That’s neither bankruptcy nor insolvency. Congress can fix this, perhaps by raising the income cap on Social Security taxes,” Weiner explains.

Weiner points out that, in 2026, the income cap for paying Social Security taxes is set to be $181,800. He also emphasizes that Social Security has faced repeated budget cuts to fund tax breaks for the wealthy. “We must protect Social Security as a priority,” Weiner says. “As Speaker Emerita Pelosi often reminds us, ‘First, do no harm.’”

Aging Groups Give Their Thoughts About Fixing Social Security

In statements, Social Security advocacy groups have also weighed in on and give comments on the latest Social Security and Medicare Trustee reports.

Nancy Altman, President of Social Security Works, argues that the program is fully affordable and costs only about 6% of the GDP at the end of the 21st century. She believes Congress will act to avert the projected shortfall, as it always has in the past. The key question to ask, Altman says, is whether lawmakers will choose to bring in more money through higher taxes or reduce benefits.

Altman strongly opposes cutting benefits, charges that politicians who don’t support increasing Social Security revenue are, by default, advocating for cuts. She highlights the impact of income inequality, which has cost Social Security over $1.4 trillion since 1983. “If the wealthy paid their fair share into the program, we could easily protect and expand Social Security’s modest benefits,” she notes.

While Americans are divided on many issues, Altman points out that there is broad consensus in support of Social Security. “The real crisis facing Social Security is not a future shortfall, but the ongoing sabotage it’s experiencing now,” she says. Altman specifically references the role of Elon Musk’s DOGE, which has pushed out thousands of Social Security staff members, including nearly half of its senior executives, resulting in an irreplaceable loss of institutional knowledge.

Despite these challenges, Altman notes that Social Security is run efficiently, with administrative costs well under a penny for every dollar spent. A major increase or decrease in administrative spending would have minimal impact on the program’s finances.

Max Richtman, President and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, says this year’s comments on the Trustees’ report, mirrors those he made last year – It’s time to rebuild reserves in the Social Security Trust Fund. However, he warns against harmful proposals such as raising the retirement age or means-testing benefits, both of which would cut benefits for millions of Americans.

“Raising the retirement age to 69 or 70 would significantly reduce lifetime benefits. These ideas have been part of Republican proposals to address the projected shortfall,” Richtman explains.

Richard Fiesta, Executive Director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, urges aging advocacy groups not to remain complacent. “Republicans in Congress are eager to cut the benefits Americans have worked a lifetime to earn,” he warns. “We cannot allow Social Security to be privatized or dismantled.”

Fiesta also calls for stronger Medicare reform, urging Congress to curb the high cost of prescription drugs and hold Medicare Advantage insurance corporations accountable for rising costs that don’t benefit patients.

A Final Note…

Social Security is an essential lifeline for millions of Americans, and its future is now at a crossroads. Can a partisan Congress work together to find a political viable fix?

While the media reports Social Security’s impending insolvency and bankruptcy, there is no doubt that Congress must act soon to ensure the program’s long-term sustainability. Whether through increasing revenue or reforming benefits, the decision on how to strengthen Social Security will shape the future of retirement and disability benefits for generations to come. It’s time for Congress to act.

View the 2025 Trustees Report at www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/TR/2025/.

Senior Agenda Coalition of RI unveils its 2025 legislative priorities at forum,

Published in RINewsToday on March 17, 2025

On March 14, 2025, hundreds of older Rhode Islanders, aging network providers, state officials, and lawmakers gathered at the Senior Agenda Coalition of Rhode Island (SACRI)’s 2025 legislative forum, “United Voices for Meaningful Advocacy” at the Crowne Plaza in Warwick. With the RI House deliberating the FY 2025 budget and key legislation impacting older adults, SACRI announced its legislative priorities.

SACRI Board Chair Kathy McKeon gave welcoming remarks, giving recognition to major sponsor Delta Dental. Serving as master of ceremonies, Executive Director Carol Anne E. Costa kept the three hour Legislative Forum on track.

SACRI Policy Advisor Maureen Maigret gave an overview and highlighted the growing influence of Rhode Island’s aging population.

“We’re 200,000 strong and growing,” she said, noting that within five years, one in four Rhode Islanders will be 65 or older. In 21 of the state’s 39 cities and towns, older adults now make up at least 20% of the population, with some communities reaching over 30%.

The Economic Impact of Older Adults

Maigret noted that 21% of older Rhode Islanders still work, many are caregivers for loved ones, and vote in higher numbers than any other age group. About 12% are veterans, and many volunteer at senior centers, Meals on Wheels, RSVP, and The Village Common of RI.

Older adults also contribute significantly to the economy. According to AARP’s Longevity Economic Outlook report, those aged 50 and older generate 40% of the nation’s GDP. In Rhode Island, retirees inject $4 billion into the economy through Social Security benefits.

However, many older adults struggle financially. “The ‘forgotten middle’ falls through the cracks,” Maigret said, referring to those with low incomes who don’t qualify for Medicaid or other public benefits. Long-term care costs are rising, and even with home equity many middle-income adults will not be able to pay for long-term.

Census data reveals that one in four Rhode Island households headed by someone 65 or older have incomes less than $25,000 annually, and nearly half have less than $50,000. The average Social Security benefit is $23,995, with men receiving $26,372 and women $23,565.

Shaping SACRI’s 2025 Legislative Agenda

Survey results from SACRI’s October 2024 Conference guided this year’s priorities. Among 241 respondents (42% aged 75 and older), top concerns included healthcare costs and access, economic security, housing, and community supports.

SACRI’s top priority is expanding the state’s Medicare Savings Program (MSP) by increasing income and asset limits. “Expanding MSP eligibility would provide an extra $185 monthly, or $2,200 annually, to thousands of older adults,” Maigret said. The federal government would cover the cost of those newly eligible. This extra income could help with food, utility bills, or rent and a boon to the state’s economy, she said.

With primary care practices closing due to retirement and low reimbursements, SACRI is pushing for a rate review to ensure competitive payments.

Though fewer than 5% of older Rhode Islanders live in nursing homes, Maigret stressed the importance of addressing the industry’s staffing shortages, and substandard care, SACRI supports increasing wages for direct care staff, rewarding high-performing nursing homes, ensuring financial transparency, and preventing Medicaid cuts.

To address the housing crisis, SACRI advocates for fair allocation of state housing funds for housing for older adults and persons with disabilities. With public housing waitlists up to five years long, this is essential. SACRI is also pushing to expand income eligibility for the property tax relief program to $50,000 and mandating accessibility features in new developments.

Aging in place is another priority. SACRI calls for adding $600,000 ($10 per person age 65 and older) to the state budget to support community senior centers and enacting a caregiver tax credit to assist Rhode Island’s 112,000 caregivers, who spend an average of $7,000 out of pocket annually.

SACRI also seeks to increase Medicaid’s asset limit from $4,000 to $12,000 to help older adults on Medicaid remain at home. Additional funding for volunteer programs and continuing the “Ride to Anywhere Pilot” are also on SACRI’s agenda.

Maigret also noted SACRI is in close contact with the state’s Congressional delegation to oppose any harmful Medicaid cuts or changes in Social Security.”

Lawmakers Respond

Bringing greetings from House Speaker Joe Shekarchi, Rep. Lauren Carson (D-Dist. 75, Newport), who chairs the Special Legislative Commission on Services and Programs for Older Rhode Islanders, acknowledged the political power of older voters. “In the 2024 primary, 87% of voters were over age 85. I paid close attention to that,” she said.

Carson emphasized the importance of protecting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. “Social Security is a promise. We paid into it. We can’t lose that program,” she said.

She highlighted legislative victories from 2024, including a $10 million investment to stabilize nursing homes, raising the pension exemption from $20,000 to $50,000, and launching the “Digital Age” initiative to bridge the digital divide. However, she stressed that more work remains.

Carson is also leading efforts to eliminate ageist language from state statutes, replacing terms like “elderly” and “senior citizen” with “older adults.” “We’re living diverse lifestyles beyond age 60, and our language should reflect that,” she said.

Representing Senate President Dominick J. Ruggerio (D-Dist. 4, North Providence, Providence) Senator Jacob E. Bissaillon (D-Dist. 1, Providence), chair of the Senate Committee on Housing & Municipal Government, echoed Carson’s concerns. He warned that state lawmakers must protect hard-won progress in light of potential federal cuts and a $250 million state budget shortfall.

Bissaillon called for addressing the housing crisis. “There are 150,000 Rhode Island households paying over 33% of their income on housing. We need 20,000 more affordable units and 2,000 permanent supportive housing units,” he said. He also supports eliminating the state income tax on Social Security and pointed to the Senate’s newly established Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies Committee noting it is important aims to protect older adults from cyber scams. “It’s critical that Rhode Island keeps pace with technology,” Bissaillon said “We have our work cut out for us,” he concluded.

Following the legislative priorities session, Carlson called to order a meeting of the Special Legislative Commission on Services and Programs for Older Rhode Islanders.

At this time, Elizabeth Dugan, PhD from the University of Massachusetts Gerontology Institute presented highlights from the 2025 RI Healthy Aging Data Report scheduled for full release on May 1st.

A Final Note…

It was obvious today that older voices must be heard,” said Director Mary Lou Moran of the City of Pawtucket’s Division of Senior Services, emphasizing the importance of SACRI’s Legislative Forum . She noted that the event provided a valuable opportunity for seniors, aging advocates, and organizations to gather and share the latest information, resources and more importantly hear from the State’s legislative leaders.

Moran expressed her support for SACRI’s advocacy for the State to allocate $10 per person aged 65 and over to communities to fund senior centers and senior programs. “Senior centers play a vital role in helping older Rhode Islanders age in place within their communities and offer innumerable opportunities for social engagement, healthy living opportunities, and act as a reliable resource for not only them but for their families and their caregivers” she explained.

Moran also strongly supports SACRI’s efforts to increase the income eligibility for the state’s Medicare Savings Program (MSP). By participating in MSP, individuals can have their Part B Medicare premium covered, and for some low-income participants, the program also helps with prescription drug costs. “Reducing the cost of Part B premiums and, for some[] who are income eligible, covering prescription drug expenses allows older adults to redirect those savings toward essentials like rent, utilities, and food,” she added.

To watch SACRI’s Leadership Forum held on March 14, 2025, go to: https://capitoltvri.cablecast.tv/show/10954?site=1.

To view Larson’s Special Legislative Commission on Services and Programs for Older Rhode Islanders held at SARCI’s Leadership Forum, go to: https://capitoltvri.cablecast.tv/show/10955?site=1.

To learn more about SACRI, go to https://senioragendari.org/