Tag Archives for Senior Agenda Consortium

Gray Power Can Turn a Campaign Sour

Published in Senior Digest on October 2004

After 24 years on Smith Hill that included a 10-year stint as House speaker, John Harwood’s career came to a surprising end recently when 33-year-old former prosecutor J. Patrick O’Neill’s grass-roots campaign brought home the votes.  The lopsided victory, 758 votes for O’Neill to 352 for Harwood, propelled the political novice into the district 59 House seat.

Two years ago, Harwood barely kept his long-held House seat after a vigorous political campaign by write-in independent candidate Bruce Bayuk.  According to Joseph Fleming, of Fleming & Associates, a Cumberland-based polling and political consultant, seniors casting votes for Harwood at the polling place in Kennedy Manor on Broad Street, played a key role in his victory in that election cycle.

Fleming, who also serves as a political analyst for Channel 12 News said that senior voter support for Harwood was almost nonexistent in the recent Democratic primary.  Senior voters joined with anti-Harwood voters throughout the legislative district to give the former House speaker the boot.

“Harwood lost better than 2-to-1 at the polling place in Kennedy Manor,” Fleming said. “Seniors decided it was a time for a change.”

Over the years, political candidates have made pre-election day pilgrimages to Pawtucket’s senior high-rises.  In District 59, both Harwood and O’Neill courted voters in high-rises, providing food during meet and greet events.

“It’s a myth that a good meal at a senior high-rise will ultimately equate to a vote,” quips Fleming. “Seniors may go down to eat the food, but it doesn’t mean that you’ll get their vote.  Everyone feeds them, but they can’t vote for both sides.” Moreover, he said, the majority of older voters don’t reside in senior high rises.

“Seniors read campaign materials look at the campaign issues and vote for people who reflect their views on these issues,” Fleming says.

Darrell West, a Brown University professor and political pollster, notes that seniors are the biggest voting block in Rhode Island. “Not only are they a sizeable group in numbers, they also are more likely to exercise their franchise to vote,” he says.

Ken McGill, registrar for the City of Pawtucket, agrees with West’s assessment.  McGill says that in any election, political candidates can count on senior voters to turn out in high numbers.

“Seniors were brought up respecting the right to vote and how important it is. They know what is at stake and pay careful attention to the issues that not only affect them, but  issues impacting on members of their family, McGill says.

“Compared to young people, seniors are 30 to 40 percentage points more likely to vote, West said. “Seniors vote because they are invested in their community and come from a generation where it was considered any honor to vote,” says West.  He added that young people tend to be very cynical about politics and more likely to feel their vote does not matter.

West said that seniors voter as a bloc only when they see their issues directly at stake in an election. “If an election centers on Social Security or Medicare, they are more likely to overcome differences by gender, income and ethnicity and cast a ‘senior’ vote,” he says.

Adds Kathleen S. Connell, director of AARP-RI, “There are many reasons why candidates look to the senior citizens for votes. One of them being, the issues that affect the concerned seniors are the same issues that will also affect the candidates and their families now or in the future.”  Also, candidates know that seniors are the most reliable and informed voters, she says.

One of the questions surrounding the upcoming election is whether seniors will support the Rhode Island GOP in its efforts to increase the numbers in the General Assembly?

“Seniors lean Democratic because the elderly typically has seen democrats speak out most forcefully about the need to take care of seniors and protect Medicare and Social Security,” says West. However, Republicans have made in-roads with moral or ethical issues, he says.

Aging groups are gearing up for the upcoming November elections to send educated voting seniors to the polls, Connell says.

“This year, some of our volunteers are participating in presidential debate watches with Rhode Island College, and we are distributing voter guides for them to track the candidate responses to issues of importance to AARP members.  They can use these guides to further study the issues before going to the polls.”

Richard Bidwell, executive director of the Rhode Island Gray Panthers, also sees the value of getting educated senior voters to the polls. With the backdrop of the upcoming elections, the Senior Agenda Consortium (SAC), founded by the Gray Panthers and now comprised of 20 aging groups, is working to improve seniors’ knowledge of issues and develop strategies to pressure candidates to support SAC’s legislative agenda.

 As it did two years ago, SAC, which is funded by the Rhode Island Foundation, will organize three regional forums, to prod the candidates to support its legislation positions on issues ranging from ensuring access to low-cost prescription drugs, better funding for community long-term care services and protecting RIPTA bus routes.  The results will be released to the media.

Fogarty, Senior Advocates to Rally for Increased Funds for State’s Co-Pay Program

Published in Pawtucket Times on March 22, 2004

Research is just beginning to show what Rhode Island aging advocates already know – that more assistance is required for helping the disabled and seniors to reside independently in their homes in the community.

According to researchers at the Disability Statistics Center at the University of California at San Francisco, about 3.3 million community-residing adults who require assistance with two or more activities of daily living (ADLs) need help from another person.

Of these, almost one million people need increased care, more than they are receiving – particularly those who live alone.

ADLs include bathing, dressing, getting into or out of bed or a chair, toileting, eating and other activities that are required to maintain their homes, such as shopping and preparing meals.

This study, published in the March issue of The Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, is considered to be the first to estimate the level of care required to help people.

“Individuals who need personal assistance with two or more of the five basic ADLs [mentioned above] and whose needs are unmet, have a shortfall of 16.6 hours of help per week,” said lead author Dr. Mitchell P. LaPlante.  Joining him on the project were Drs. H. Stephen Kaye, Taewoon Kang, and Charlene Harrington, in a written statement.

Among adults whose assistance needs are not fully met, people living alone fare worse than those who live with others, the researchers said. The study found those living by themselves receive only 56 percent of the help they need, while those living with family members or friends receive 80 percent of the hours of help, they need.

The research findings indicate that having unmet needs is linked with numerous adverse consequences, including discomfort, weight loss, dehydration, falls, burns and dissatisfaction with the help they do receive.  This puts these people at risk of being forced to leave their homes and move into costly nursing facilities.

Additionally, the University of California at San Francisco study also reported that unmet needs among people living alone are more an issue for the elderly, since two-thirds of those living alone and needing more help are age 65 or older.

This research study, probably the first of may to come that estimates the assistance required by the nation’s disabled and elderly, should be delivered to the doorstep of Gov. Donald Carcieri and every state lawmaker.

Even with the graying of the Ocean State’s population, the governor and the Rhode Island General Assembly are moving too slow to adequately fund less costly community-based care programs.

Carcieri has given an additional $ 200,000 in funding to the Department of Elderly Affairs (DEA) co-pay program in his recently released proposed 2005 budget.

While appreciative for this increase in funding in the showdown of the state’s huge budget deficit, senior advocates say this is not enough to keep people off the waiting list for this worthy program.

DEA’s co-pay program keeps 1,500-plus low-income frail seniors who do not qualify for the state’s Medicaid program but who require ongoing services to remain in the community in their homes by providing a little bit of funding for certified nursing assistants (for assisting with bathing, meals, shopping, laundry, and light housekeeping). And DEA’s co-pay program also provides subsidies for adult day care.

Last October, a DEA freeze on new admissions to the co-pay program left 200 frail seniors on a waiting list for home and community-based care, said senior advocates.

According to the state’s Long-Term Care coordinating Council (LTCCC), the typical person in DEA’s co-pay program is between ages 65 and 104, with the average age being 84. Most are women and more than half live alone. Without the state’s co-pay, these seniors will have to pay the entire fee for their care –    which they cannot afford – or enter a nursing home, or go without the help they need to do simple things such as bathing, shampooing and dressing.

Susan Sweet, a consumer advocate  who sits on the LTCCC, expressed concern that a DEA freeze – putting the copayment program on hold – for those on the waiting lists still exists this fiscal year.

“These people have been waiting a long time to get the home care or adult day care services that they need. I am afraid that waiting longer will result in many of them entering nursing facilities prematurely,” said Sweet.

Sweet noted Carcieri’s proposed 2005 allocates an additional $ 200,000 in funding for next year’s DEA’s co-pay program.

“It will take more funding than that to take care of the frail seniors still left on a waiting list,” Sweet charged, noting that DEA Director Adelita S. Orefice, did say another $ 250,000 would be needed in FY 2005 to meet DEA’s co-pay program demand.

Lt. Gov. Charles J. Fogarty, who is chairman of the LTCCC, will join senior advocates today at 11:00 a.m. at the Statehouse, calling for the state to reopen admission to a state-funded co-pay program that helps limited-income seniors pay for home and community-based care.

The press conference is expected to draw several family caregivers and representatives of AARP-RI, Choices Coalition, Respite Services, R.I. Adult Day Care Services Association, Alzheimer’s Association of R.I., R.I meals on Wheels, R.I Partnership for Home Care, R.I. Senior Center Directors Association, Senior Agenda Consortium and the Silver-Haired Legislature.

“Freezing the DEA co-pay program is a fiscal folly,” Fogerty said in a written statement obtained by All About Seniors that will be released at today’s rally.

“It is shortsighted from both a financial and a human perspective. It is not as if this freeze will result in overall cost savings,” said the Lt. governor.

Fogarty said this freeze was ordered to avoid having the DEA spend more than what was budgeted for the program in the current fiscal year – an amount that was less than what was spent on the program in FY 2003.

At this rally Fogarty will call for the state to provide adequate funding in the FY 2005 budget for DEA’s co-payment program to address the unmet need.

“To the contrary,” Fogarty said, “it may wind up costing taxpayers much more, because these seniors are still going to need care and they’re going to get by being forced into nursing homes where the taxpayers will pay tens of thousands more than we would have paid for the co-pay program.”

According to Fogarty, in FY 2003, the state supported 1,457 seniors in the program, spending $ 3,650,117, or $ 2,505 per senior. That’s less than 1 percent of all long-term care spending. Contrast this, he said, in is written statement, with the annual cost per nursing home resident – between $ 32,000 and $ 53,700 (this figure excludes the average 20 percent patient contribution to care and includes state and federal dollars).

Fogarty said, “It boggles the mind that in tight budget times, we would opt for the more expensive solution – especially in light of the fact that the less costly option of keeping seniors in their homes is the most humane option.”

As mentioned in a previous column, there is also a freeze and waiting list for the state’s respite program, which provides assistance to family caregivers. This freeze continues and no additional funding has been allocated for this program in Carcieri’s proposed 2005 budget.

Carcieri and state  lawmakers must not continue to put patches on the state’s old dilapidated long-term care deliver system. As I previously mentioned, now is the time to tackle the thorny issues of long-term care and its rising costs.

Rhode Island must move to create a long-term care delivery system that will adequately provide funding for keeping seniors independent in the comfort of their homes while adequately providing reimbursement to nursing facilities that take care of sicker patients.

Seniors can support Fogarty’s call for adequate state funding for DEA’s co-pay program by attending the rally scheduled today at 11:00 p.m.at the Statehouse.

Meanwhile a DEA budget hearing will be held before the House Finance Committee later in the afternoon, at 1:00 p.m. in Room 35 of the Statehouse.

Seniors can attend this hearing to give their support for increased state funding for community-based care long-term programs. Testimony taken from the public will be televised on the state’s access cable channel.

Advocacy Groups Support Bills Making Pharmaceutical Drugs More Affordable

Published in the Pawtucket Times on April 21, 2003

The Gray Panthers have been around the Ocean State since 1975.

Richard Bidwell, state coordinator of the Rhode Island Gray Panthers, which represents 400 members state-wide, said his group has fought on behalf of seniors and disable persons on many aging and consumer-related issues.

He recalled one legislative victory that enabled seniors and disabled persons to use a special RIPTA bus pass and ride free during off-peak hours. Later the Gray Panthers would successfully expand this use to all times.

As state coordinator, Bidwell has been involved in lobbying the Rhode Island General Assembly on behalf of the state’s growing senior population for more than 14 years. Last year, the Gray Panthers coordinated their efforts with senior advocacy groups to organize the Senior Agenda Consortium.

This year, the Consortium turns its attention to four legislative proposals that will assist seniors in paying for costly pharmaceuticals.

“We’re trying to get them out of committee with favorable votes,” Bidwell told All About Seniors.

The group has locked horns wit Blue Chip in an attempt to lower prescription drug prices for older beneficiaries who have signed up for that health plan.

S 566, introduced by Sen. James Sheehan (D-North Kingston) would require health plans, such as Blue Chip, to pass on their drug discounts to their members. Blule Chip’s highest premium (costing $148 a month) allows senior beneficiaries to purchase up to $ 1,000 worth of brand-name drugs a year, being charged only a $ 25 co-pay for reach prescription.

This premium also allows a person to purchase up to $ 5,000 in generic drugs, with an $ 8 co-pay charged for each prescription.

Bidwell said that with each purchase of a prescription, Blue Chip subtracts the retail price rather than the actual contracted lower price allowed by the insurance company for the purchase.

As a result,” People are being charged too much,” Bidwell said. “The $ 1,000 coverage is disappearing too quickly with the purchase of each prescription drug.

“Our legislation allows Blue Chip to subtract only the contracted actual price of the prescription rather than the much higher retail price.”

“At press time, the Gray Panthers are attempting to find a House sponsor for this legislation.

A related bill, H 5237, sponsored by Rep. Peter Ginaitt (D-Warwick) and S 374, sponsored by Sen. Elizabeth Roberts (D-Cranston), would allow a person eligible to participate in the Rhode Island Pharmaceutical Assistance to the Elderly Program (RIPAE), who also has prescription drug coverage through a health plan, to use RIPAE to pay for an individual prescription drug once they reach a maximum level of coverage for that drug.  Currently access to RIPAE until he or she uses all of the brand and generic allowance by Blue Chip.

Meanwhile, Bidwell noted that the Gray Panthers are also pushing H 5239, sponsored by Sen. Mary Ellen Goodwin (D-Providence), for expanding RIPAE to allow persons ages 55 to  61 on Social Security Disability Insurance to receive RIPAE co-payments at the same level as Ocean State seniors.

Finally, another legislative proposal, H 5478, sponsored by Rep. Fausto Anguilla (D-Bristol-Warren) and S 299, sponsored by Sen. Rhode Perry (D-Providence), would allow Rhode Island residents to buy prescription drug from Canadian pharmacies, where they are routinely cheaper.

Susan Sweet, an elder rights advocate consultant to non-profit groups and a member of the Senior Agenda Consortium, has called for the passage of these bills, which are key to creating a “responsive and less costly” long-term care system.

“Pharmaceutical drugs may be expensive, but they are certainly less expensive than hospitalization, nursing home care, and other medical services required as a result o a senior not having or taking the prescribed medication,” said Sweet.

“It is primarily the advances in pharmaceutical therapy that have enabled seniors to live longer and healthier lives. By permitting more access for seniors and persons with disabilities to afford their prescriptions, state policy makers can save people’s lives and ultimately save taxpayer money by preventing more costly interventions,” added Sweet.

At the AARP gubernatorial debate, seniors called for state government intervention in putting the brakes of rising pharmaceutical costs.

The calls for action continue to grow. During this legislative session, the Gray Panthers, AARP, the RI Commission on Aging, along with the Forum on Aging and the Senior Agenda Consortium, have made this legislative issue a high priority.

It is time for Gov. Don Carcieri and the leadership of the General Assembly to tackle this senior issue head-on and allocate the necessary state funds to help make prescription drugs more affordable for Rhode Island seniors and persons with disabilities.

Because of the growing costs of medication, a large number of seniors cannot afford to fill their prescriptions, many do not event take their prescriptions as directed by their physicians.”  Noncompliance in taking medications or not taking them at all can result in unnecessary hospitalization, premature admission to nursing facilities, and untimely death.

Even with the state’s looming budget deficit, enabling seniors to afford the purchase of needed pharmaceutical drugs will hopefully be placed on the General Assembly’s short list of bills that must be enacted this legislative session.

Call Senate President Bill Irons at 401-222-2447 and House Speaker Bill Murphy at 401- 222-2466 to tell them of your concerns about this issue and how   the high cost of prescription drugs hits you in your pocketbook.

Urge these key lawmakers to pass legislation that makes pharmaceuticals more affordable to all seniors and persons with disabilities