Tag Archives for retirement-planning

Retirees reflect on financial fragility of retirement

Published in RINewsToday on December 9, 2024

Literally just hot off the press… the Los Angeles, California-based nonprofit Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies® (TCRS) in collaboration with Transamerica Institute®, released the findings of its 24 Annual Transamerica Retirement survey.  Considered to be one of the largest and longest running annual surveys of its kind, its findings paint a picture of being retired in America.

Retiree life in the post-pandemic economy examines the health and well-being, personal finances, and retirement security of U.S. retirees no longer working. The report’s analysis was prepared by the research team at Transamerica Institute and TCRS. The 25-minute online survey was conducted within the U.S. by The Harris Poll on behalf of Transamerica Institute between September 14 and October 23, 2023, among a nationally representative sample of 10,002 people, including a subsample of 2,404 retirees who are retired and do not work.

Shedding light on the many facets of retirement

According to TCRS’s retirement survey, released on Nov. 26th, fewer than one in four retirees (23%) say they are very confident and able to maintain a comfortable lifestyle throughout their retirement.

“Retirement brings freedom and time for personal pursuits,” said Catherine Collinson, CEO and president of Transamerica Institute and TCRS in a statement announcing the release of the 76-page report. “However, retirees are living on a fixed income with limited financial resources. Many would be unable to withstand a major financial shock, such as the need to pay for long-term care. Retirees’ fragile financial situation serves as a cautionary tale that underscores the imperative for strengthening our retirement system,” she says.

“Many retirees may wonder what they could have done differently to save and plan for retirement, and many may feel they have done everything right but still came up short,” adds Collinson. “In reality, over their working careers, the world has changed, the retirement landscape has evolved, and the need to self-fund a greater portion of one’s retirement income has intensified,” she said.  

Based on the report’s findings, retirees are active and engaged in meaningful ways. As retirees, they are:

·         spending more time with family and friends (58%)

·         pursuing hobbies (43%)

·         traveling (36%)

·         taking care of their grandchildren (19%)

·         doing volunteer work (16%)

·         caregiving (10%)

Although most retirees express a positive feeling about life, others say they are distressed.  Most retirees say they are:

·         generally happy (89%)

·         have close relationships with family and friends (88%)

·         enjoying life (86%)

·         have a positive view of aging (79%)

·         have a strong sense of purpose (79%)

·         have an active social life (53%)

However, three in 10 retirees (30%) have financial trouble in making ends meet, 27% indicate they often feel unmotivated and overwhelmed, 24% often feel anxious and depressed, and 17% are isolated and lonely.

Retirees who retired before the age of 65 are cutting short their working years and income, a situation that could inevitably lead to a decrease in their retirement income. Almost six in 10 retirees say they retired sooner than planned (58%) and, among them, almost half did so for personal health-related reasons (46%) and employment-related issues (43%), while 20% did so for family-related reasons. Only one in five (21%) retired early because they were financially able.

Retirees are struggling to juggle competing financial priorities and debt, the findings indicate. Retirees’ say their current top financial priorities include

·         building emergency savings (31%)

·         just getting by to cover basic living expenses (29%)

·         continuing to save for retirement (24%)

·         paying off one or more forms of debt as a current financial priority (45%)

o    paying off credit cards (30%), paying off mortgages (20%), paying off other consumer debt (10%), and paying off student loans (3%).

The survey found that the retiree’s greatest retirement fears centered around money and health issues.  Forty-two percent expressed fear that Social Security will be reduced or may cease to exist in the future.  Almost six in 10 retirees (58%) expect Social Security to be their primary source of income throughout their retirement, reinforcing their view that the retirement program is the cornerstone of their retirement income.

Retiring before age 65 impacts your Social Security benefit. Retirees currently receiving Social Security started at age 63 (median) which translates to a lower monthly benefit than if they had waited until their full retirement age of 66 or 67, depending on the year they were born. Only 4% of retirees waited until age 70 or later which would have maximized their monthly benefit, noted the report.

Additionally, the retirees fear declining health that requires long-term care (37%), losing their independence (32%), outliving their savings and investments (32%), and cognitive decline, dementia, or Alzheimer’s (28%).

Fear of unanticipated costly long-term care

Only 13% of retirees are very confident they would be able to afford long-term care, if needed – and only 13% have long-term care insurance, noted the findings. When asked if their health declines and they need help with daily activities and/or nursing care, almost half of retirees (48%) say they plan to rely on family members and friends to provide such care. Moreover, relatively few retirees have codified their wishes in legal documents such as powers of attorney and advance directives.

Annual Income

The survey respondents had an annual household income of $55,000 (estimated median) as of late 2023 with more than one-third of retirees (36%) having an income of less than $50,000. Retirees’ household savings excluding home equity were $71,000 (estimated median) in 2023.

Untapped opportunities might be helpful to retirees in strengthening their finances.The researchers say that retirees need to be fully engaged in financial planning or taking steps that could improve their overall situation. Only 24% indicate they have “a lot” of working knowledge about personal finance, 19% have a financial strategy for retirement in the form of a written plan, and just 7% frequently discuss saving, investing, and retirement planning with family and close friends. Only one in three (33%) use a professional financial advisor.

“Many retirees may wonder what they could have done differently to save and plan for retirement, and many may feel they have done everything right but still came up short,” said Collinson. “In reality, over their working careers, the world has changed, the retirement landscape has evolved, and the need to self-fund a greater portion of one’s retirement income has intensified.”

Thoughts about Retirement in the Ocean State    

“I can confidently say there’s less road ahead to retirement than there is behind me,” quips Kemal Saatcioglu, Ph.D., associate professor and chair of the Economics and Finance Department at Rhode Island College (RIC). “Going through this report was an eye opener even for me and I came away with a mix of inspiration, awareness, and a sense of urgency,” he says.

“Asnoted in this report, the retirees’ ability to find purpose, freedom, and joy, even amid challenges shows the resiliency and flexibility we all possess, notes the RIC Professor.  “Knowing that many retirees successfully navigate these waters is inspiring and is a motivator for getting into retirement planning with confidence,” he adds.

According to Saatcioglu, the report is a wake-up call for retirees. The data clearly indicates that they, in general, can be better prepared.  “The statistics about limited savings, reliance on Social Security, and the lack of written financial plans might push those of us nearing retirement to re-evaluate our financial readiness. The survey data will likely create motivation to consult a financial advisor to ensure better use of available resources,” he says. 

Saatcioglu calls the points about life expectancy and the length of retirement striking. “While it may be daunting at first to consider how 15 to 20 years could stretch retirement savings, prioritizing strategies for sustainability, such as long-term care insurance or budgeting for healthcare costs are great steps to take,” he says, especially the importance of mental health and stress management also encourages a more holistic view of our overall well-being.

Retirees must recognize local challenges and strengths. “Granted Rhode Island is not the most retirement friendly state. Higher costs of living, especially on housing, utilities, and food, and less than a friendly tax environment are challenges but knowing about them ahead of time and taking steps early on can mitigate those challenges,” recommends Saatcioglu.

Finally, Saatcioglu believes that the survey creates a motivation to take action—whether it’s updating financial plans, discussing retirement goals with family, or exploring community resources. Retirement can be an exciting, and rather long, stage of life, as long as proactive steps are taken now.

Maureen Maigret, Policy Advisor for the Senior Agenda Coalition, notes that the findings of the Transamerica report align with what older Rhode Islanders are concerned with in terms of their economic security, especially the  cost of healthcare and housing, worries about being able to afford any needed long-term services and a lack of planning to meet those need.  “Adding to those worries is uncertainty about possible proposed changes from a new federal administration for two of the most valuable programs for older adults – Social Security and Medicare,” she says.

According to Maigret, the Senior Agenda Coalition of RI (SACRI) has advocated to enhance the economic security of older Rhode Islanders.  She stated that a recent SACRI survey found the costs for health care and housing were priority issues for the state’s older population.  “That’s why we will continue to work in 2025 to expand the Medicare Savings Program to increase its income eligibility so lower-income older adults and persons on Medicare will be able to get their Medicare Part B premium covered and in some cases co-payments,” she says, also stressing the importance of ensurng that the housing bond funds are targeted toward developing more affordable housing options for older adults.  

“I deeply appreciate the insights in this report. It highlights the importance of proactive retirement planning and the emotional and financial complexities retirees face in the post-pandemic economy,” says Josh Wells, CEO of The Retirement Factory, who stresses the importance of balancing the emotional and financial aspects of retirement.

According to Wells, retirees often feel the weight of navigating Social Security decisions or managing healthcare costs. This report underscores that many retirees are unsure about these critical choices, with only 7% frequently discussing retirement planning with family or friends and just 33% using a financial advisor. ”It’s a powerful reminder that education and open dialogue are key to achieving retirement confidence,” he says.

“Rhode Island retirees exemplify resilience and adaptability in the face of change,” says Wells.  “The report highlights that 70% of retirees feel confident about maintaining a comfortable lifestyle, even amidst financial and health challenges. For Ocean State retirees, this confidence is bolstered by state-specific benefits such as the ability to exclude up to $20,000 of retirement income from state taxes for those at full retirement age and meeting income thresholds, as well as property tax relief of up to $600 for eligible seniors with limited incomes,” he says, noting that these program reflect “the state’s commitment to supporting its senior population, enabling retirees to plan carefully, stay connected to their communities, and enjoy a fulfilling retirement.”

Like the report’s findings, RI retirees are juggling competing financial priorities, especially with only a minimal 2024 increase in their ERSRI pension, says Sandra Paquette, representing the Advocates for Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) Restoration and Pension Reform. Of equal, often ignored significance, these retirees have been deprived of 13 years of potential savings,” she says.

“By unjustly removing a COLA, the former teachers, state workers and some municipal employees  have been plunged into survival mode, where limited, fixed incomes are barely sufficient to cover necessities and essentials. In many instances, choices must be made among prescriptions, heating and food– by individuals who spent a lifetime of service, and of contributing  to their retirement benefits,” adds Paquette.

For a copy of Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies’ new report, go to https://www.transamericainstitute.org/research/publications/details/retiree-life-in-the-post-pandemic-economy-2024.

Presidential Commission Kicks off Social Security Reform Debate

Published in Pawtucket Times on December 17, 2001

Amid the nation mobilizing for a global fight against terrorism, a sliding economy with a rising unemployment rate, the President’s Commission to Strengthen Social Security last week released its bipartisan plan to fix the ailing Social Security program.

With elections looming next year, Congress will be forced to turn it attention to politically sticky domestic issue, how to modernize and restore the fiscal soundness of the Social Security program.

Finishing up its seven months of work, the 16-member Presidential Commission, divided evenly among Democrats and Republican, voted unanimously to sent its 165-page final report in draft form to the Bush White House. Two days after the panel released its report, House Republicans threw two bills into the legislative hopper, mirroring several of the recommended approaches.  The Social Security debate has begun.

While the Commission estimates that it will cost at least $2 trillion to revamp Social Security, it does not identify where the funds will come from.

Specifically, three approaches were suggested by the federal panel as a way of bringing reforms to the Social Security program. All involved the creation of voluntary personal accounts with a premise that workers investing in these accounts would ultimately receive higher retirement benefits by their investing in the social market.  Meanwhile, two plans seek provide better retirement benefits by their investing in the stock market.  Meanwhile, two plans seek to provide better benefits to low-income workers. All plans would seek to restore the fiscal stability of Social Security.

Senior advocacy groups are now weighting in on this highly visible and controversial policy issue that will likely become a key election issue next year. “None of the three draft plans put forward by the Commission today achieves the goal set out by the President, closing the gap in the program’s solvency over the next 75 years. None of the plans explain how it will achieve solvency. These plans do not change the fact that private accounts expose future beneficiaries to unnecessary risk and widely varying outcomes in retirement security,” charges Max Richtman, executive director of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

Furthermore, with the push to privatization through individual accounts, the Commission does not address the issue of the impact to the existing Social Security program if moderate and higher-wage earners pull their money out of the  system, states Richtman, stressing that the Commission does not see to have considered the potential impact of such an adverse selection on the stability of the program.

“With privatization, the devel is always in the details, and the Commission has failed to provide adequate details,” Richtman adds. ”They have not provided the nuts and boots of how the plans would work and how they would affect real people.”

According to AARP CEO William Novelli, a number of questions remain unanswered by the Commission report, specifically, “the long-term financing of benefit guarantees, particularly if current budget projects and market rates of return prove to be overly optimistic.”

When the Social Security debate begins, Novelli calls for other reform proposals to be considered, such a diversifying the Social Security Trust Funds’ investments by including federally-backed debt instruments, along with raising the wage base for payroll taxes and adding newly hired state and municipal employees to the program.

U.S. Rep. T. Matsu (D-CA), Ranking Member of the Social Security Subcommittee of the House Ways and Means Committee agrees with the concerns of senior advocates. Restoring solvency of the Social Security program by workers investing part of their payroll tax in the stock market is a flawed approach and not the best strategy to  restore the fiscal integrity of the Social Security program, he says.

Privatization of Social Security would either require benefit cuts or a large infusion of federal dollars, warns U.S. Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-RI), who serves on the House Appropriations Committee and sits as a member of the House Aging Caucus.

The Rhode Island Democrat who gives the Commission report a thumbs-down, states, “There is no question that we need to encourage American’s to save more for retirement, but while we do this, we should not throw the ‘baby out with the bath water’ by raising the retirement age, diverting the Social Security Trust Fund into privatization schemes or cutting benefits to seniors.” The four-term Congressman, whose legislative district has a large elderly constituency plans to make Social Security reform a key for his campaign in the upcoming elections next year.

Jeff Neal, a spokesperson for U.S. Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-RI), tells All About Seniors that the senator does not necessary support or oppose some amount of privatization. “No amazingly specific proposal has come forward, been debated or has been thoroughly analyzed yet, Neal says. “Until that happens, it is impossible to determine if it is a good idea or not.”

Neal adds that Sen. Chafee believes that all the Democratic concerns need to be debated and resolved before Congress goes forward with any plan. “Democratic talking points look at the Commission work as a very simplistic level. Social Security is possible, besides the Medicare program, the most complex federal program, and a great deal of debate and input from both sides will be needed to tackle the solvency issue,” he says.

“Rhode Islanders need to step up and take credit for being leaders in the best social reform, notably Medicare,” urges AARP Executive Director Kathleen S. Connell. The late Democratic Congressman John Fogery and Aime J. Forand were the moving forces to create the is key federal program to protect the health and well-being of America’s seniors. “It is up to the current Rhode Island delegation to pick up the torch and lead the efforts to enact meaningful legislation to preserve and protect the Social Security program.”