Tag Archives for Medicaid

Staffing Crisis Hits Nation’s Nursing Facilities

Published in the Pawtucket Times on February 25, 2002

A yet-to-be released federal report paints a very bleak picture about the quality of care provided in the nation’s nursing facilities.

According to an article published last week by The New York Times, a draft federal report finds that 90 percent of the nation’s nursing facilities do not have enough nursing staff to properly care for their residents.

Simply, put, the lack of staffing reduces the quality of care provided in nursing facilities, increasing the incidence of bedsores, falls, malnutrition, weight loss, urinary tract infections and blood-borne infections, the report notes.

According to the draft report, which was ordered by Congress, is expected to be officially released by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in April, reaching appropriate staffing in nursing facilities would cost the federal government big bucks.

With a $ 7.6 billion annual price tag, about an 8 percent increase over current expenditures – the report – entitled “Appropriateness of Minimum Nurse Staffing Ratios in Nursing Homes” – recommends cheaper ways to fix the staffing crunch in the nation’s facilities.

Rather than regulate minimum ratios of nursing staff to residents, the report calls for better management techniques and training of certified nursing aides CNAs) to increase staff productivity and to decrease CNA turnover. Additionally, market demand sparked by an informed public that has access to publicly reported nursing staff data may even increase nurse staffing levels in facilities, the report notes.

The New York Times article does not get to the root of the nation’s staffing problems in nursing facilities, charges Al Santos, executive director of the Rhode Island Health Care Association, the state’s largest trade group that represents nursing facility providers.

“While the article only focused on the inadequacies of staffing levels across the country, it failed to report on its cause – a lack of adequate government reimbursement for nursing facility care,” Santos said.

Santos stated the federal report, which is detailed in the New York Times, is correct in its assessment that the shortage is “likely to become worse.

It should come as no surprise to policymakers that in order to increase wages and to make frontline nursing jobs competitive. Medicaid can no longer pay roughly $ 4 per hour, per patient for shelter, meals, labor costs, special care, certain therapies and other items,” Santos adds. “Costs far outweigh government reimbursements for patient care, and chronic under-funding of Medicaid directly impacts staffing.”

There is no doubt in my mind that the lack of adequate staff in facilities create poor quality of care,” says Roberta Hawkins, executive director of the Alliance for Better Long-Term Care, who also serves as the state’s ombudsman on nursing facility issues. Hawkins said she fears that the continuing staff shortage in Rhode Island facilities will chip away the past 25 years of improved resident care that has resulted from state and federal nursing facility reforms.

Although inadequate pay and benefits are obstacles to retaining staff, Hawkins predicts that it will become even more difficult to recruit CNAs when more horror stories about poor care appear in local newspapers or on state or federal agency websites.

“As a society, all of us are responsible for the care not being provided to nursing facility residents. If we don’t provide that money to pay for the best of care, we are partially responsible for that care not being provided,” Hawkins said.

Hawkins sees as permanent fix to this ongoing staffing shortage found in Rhode Island facilities – tie the reimbursement rate to the level of resident care provided. For instance, facilities with heavy-care residents would receive a higher Medicaid reimbursement rate, which takes into account the increased staffing needs of those residents.

But adequate Medicaid funding is not the only solution to the continuing staff shortage dilemma facilities face, Hawkins warned.

“We need to create upward mobility in nursing jobs, improve training specialty care provided to Alzheimer’s residents, bedridden residents and to those requiring rehabilitation,” she said.

The new federal study doesn’t surprise Lt. Gov. Charles J. Fogarty, who chairs the state’s Long-Term Care Coordinating Council (LTCCC) and to those involved in providing or regulating nursing facility care in the Ocean State.

Just last year, a statewide LTCCC study found Rhode Island’s nursing facilities reported a shortage of certified nursing assistants, the staff who provide 90 percent of the direct care to residents.

“The report gives us useful information to look at the issue of staffing and quality in Rhode Island nursing facilities,” Fogarty said. “It also should serve as a clear signal to Congress that it must do a better job of planning and funding long-term care.”

A state commission chaired by Human Services Director Jane Haywood, is currently studying how the existing Medicaid reimbursement system can be improved.

Even with a mounting state budget deficit, it is now time for the governor, state lawmakers and state officials to put the energy and resources into tackling this ongoing staff shortage issue.

With major input from the nursing facility industry and from Hawkins and her resident advocates, Haywood’s final blueprint for changes in the state’s Medicaid program must be taken seriously. With a state election looming in November, candidates running for governor, the Rhode Island General Assembly and Congress must do their homework, study the staffing crisis in the state’s nursing facilities, and develop their positions to confront this pressing policy issue.

More than 10,000 nursing facility residents and their families pray that the report to be issued by the Department of Human Services will not end up in some back office on a dusty shelf.

Confronting the Long-Term Care Dilemma in Uncertain Times

Published in the Pawtucket Times on January 14, 2002

 Aging advocates are about to find out how many slides you can cut the Rhode Island budgetary pie, especially when lawmakers are predicting that the state’s deficit could soar to hundreds of millions.

With the backdrop of a recession, pushing to keep funding at current levels for existing programs and services this legislative session may be their only hope as advocates for affordable health care and housing, education, disabled persons, seniors, and low-income families call for their fair share, too.

Meanwhile, CHOICES, a broad-based coalition of provider organizations and advocate organizations, will push this legislative session for more funding to keep Rhode Island seniors in their homes.

The coalition representing home care agencies, assisted-living facilities, adult day care, housing, senior center, disabled and senior advocates and Meals on Wheels, will continue its efforts to urge the General Assembly for reforms to Rhode Island’s long-term care system, said Paula Parker, Executive Director of Rhode Island Partnership of Home Care and a CHOICES member.

“Consumers must have options to choose programs and services that can provide them with greater independence in familiar surroundings,” Park told ALL About Seniors, adding that this is an underlying principle of CHOICE’S philosophy.

During the state’s prosperous years, Rhode Island’s allocation for home and community-based services slowly inched up from seven to eight percent of the state’s total long-term care budget.  Parker noted, however, that General Assembly funding for long-term care services continued to be heavily weighted toward funding institutional facility care.

“The challenge today is to continue the momentum of increasing state support for home and community-based services in less prosperous times,” Parker said, because the start’s rising elderly population creates a need to expand options in long-term care.

Susan Sweet, a consultant, long-time consumer advocate and CHOICES member, added that the seven-year-old coalition plans to continue its education efforts to inform legislators and the public about the cost savings of home and community care for elders as opposed to institutional care.

For example, Sweet stated that full-time adult day care five days a week may cost up to $ 10,000 annually as compared to an average $38,000 bill for nursing facility care.

Options in the state’s continuum of care include assistance with the costs of pharmaceutical drugs, community-based programs, rehabilitation facilities and nursing facility care. Sweet said, “A menu of available choices allows seniors and their families to seek out and receive the most appropriate and cost-effective care for their current situation. That’s what CHOICES is all about.”

Can long-term care options assist lawmakers in controlling the state budget while providing needed services for seniors?

Yes, said Sweet. “Not only is the quality of life greatly enhanced for elders and their families when institutionalization is delayed or eliminated, but also individual assets and state contributions to care through the Medicaid program are greatly reduced or eliminated,” she said.

Recognizing that lawmakers must work within severe budgetary constraints. Sweet said she believes it should be fiscally short-sided not to recognize the significant budgetary savings that home and community-based care- and preventative care- bring to situations that, without intervention, would lead to costly health care such as hospitalization and protracted institutional stays.

“The challenge for Rhode Island is to continue progress on creating less restrictive and less expensive community services while continuing funding for needed acute and long-term care,” Sweet said, stressing that in a tie of decreasing revenues, this will not be an easy task.

Lawmakers must either conform the long-term care crisis now for today’s seniors in the shadow of the state’s current budget deficit or in later years, when the state’s demographic time bomb I ready to explode. For today’s seniors and for the aging baby boomers who follow in their footsteps, lawmakers, state agencies, providers and seniors  must cooperate in crafting a seamless long-term care system with options that enhance quality of life and provide independence. This may take years.

But until then, amid competing interests for limited state dollars, advocates for better long-term care will have to roll up their shelves with the support of senior and disabled constituents to get this year’s slice of the state budget pie.

Aging Baby Boomers Woefully Unknowledgeable About Services

Published in Pawtucket Times on December 31, 2001

Are you a savvy shopper for services that you might one day need to purchase?

Many Americans are especially savvy when they purchase cars, electronic equipment or clothing.  But most are not when it comes to their knowledge of purchasing needed long-term care services, says a report recently released by AARP.

More than half (60 percent) of aging baby boomers age 45 plus say they are at least “somewhat familiar” with long-term care services currently available. However, they are woefully uninformed about the costs of, and funding sources for, long-term care services.

Yet with the graying of America’s population, the need for these services is expected to increase in the upcoming years. According to the 2000 U.S. Census Bureau projections, today’s 65 or older population numbers are expected to double to about 70 million in 2030, and the 85 and older population will also nearly double to about 8.5 million.  Those 85 years and older will be in the greatest need for nursing facility care.

“With the onset of the aging demographic revolution, essential that the general public not only learn about the long-term care options but understand their costs, and begin planning for their future care requirements,” said AARP CEO Bill Novelli. “Unfortunately, most of us pay little attention to the cost of such care until we or our loved ones needed it.  AARP sees  our role as informing and assisting people to make good choices.”

The AARP telephone survey asked a random sample of 1,800 Americans ages 45 and older questions  designed to measure their knowledge and understanding of the continuum of long-term care services, ranging from in-home care, assisted living to nursing home care.  In addition, to the national survey, five state-specific surveys were conducted with a random sample of 400 people age 45 and over in California, Florida, New Mexico, Washington and Wisconsin.

The survey findings suggested that aging baby boomers and seniors are generally not familiar or knowledgeable about the costs of long-term care services.  Only 15 percent could identify the cost of nursing  home care within plus or minus 20 percent of the national average of cost (about $ 4,654 per month).  Even 24 percent of those participating in the survey admitted that they did not even know the cost. And that’s not all – 51 percent estimated the cost too l ow.  So much for those savvy shoppers.

As for assisted-living facilities, one in four (27 percent) were able to come within a plus or minus 20 percent of the estimated median cost of care in an assisted-living facility while 38 percent said they did not know the national estimated median cost for assisted living per month, ranging from $ 2,000 and 2,500.

Meanwhile, survey participants continued to reveal their lack of knowledge by being generally unaware of how much an in-home visit from a skilled  nurse or aide costs.  The average Medicare reimbursement is $ 109 per a skilled nurse visit and $ 64 for a home visit by an aide.  The survey findings reported that they gave a wide range of answers, with no real consensus.  Thirty three percent even admitted they did not know the cost.

So, what about the aging baby boomers knowledge of long-term care insurance, one viable option to pay for the cost of long-term care services? About 31 percent said they have insurance that covers the cost of long-term care, when they probably didn’t.  Maybe it’s time for people to read the very small print in their insurance policies.  The Washington, D.C.-based Health Insurance Association of America estimates that only about 6 percent of Americas purchased such insurance.

Additionally, the survey respondents who said that they had insurance coverage for long-term care services were more likely to say they feel better prepared to meet the financial challenges of paying for care than those who say they do not have coverage (7 percent versus 39 percent).  This finding suggests that people who say that they long term care coverage when they do not may have a false sense of financial preparedness.

According to the new study, there is also a discrepancy between what people think Medicare and Medigap cover and what they actually cover.  More than half (55 percent), including those who say they are “very familiar” with long term care (58 percent), believe Medicare covers long-term nursing home stays.  And nearly a quarter say they would rely on Medicare to pay for such stays.  This is not the case.  Medicare does not cover long-term care nursing home stays.

The survey noted that 41 percent thought Medicare also covered assisted living care and more than 34 percent know whether it does or does not.  Medicare does not pay for assisted living.  And 57 percent correctly said that Medicare covers the cost of in-home visits from a skilled nurse. However, many respondents did not understand the difference between a home visit from a skilled nurse and a home visit by a home health aide.

More than half (52 percent) thought Medicare covers aide visits. In fact, Medicare covers only home health aide services for care that is medically necessary, not custodial care.

Kathleen S. Connell, AARP State Director, notes that this research study highlights the big gap between consumers understanding of long-term care services and its associated costs.  She adds that the findings reveal a great deal of confusion as to what long term care services are covered by Medicare and Medicaid.

“Aging baby boomers are now facing decisions regarding the purchase of long-term care services for their older parents. They will also be forced to deal with their need for services as they age and as longevity increases,” Connell says. “Consumers need to be come better informed about what Medicare and Medicaid pays for available long term care options for services that are actual costs of care.  They need to investigate different long term care insurance options, too,” she urges.

In Rhode Island there is a general recognition in agencies assisting seniors of the need for educating consumers and putting information into the hands of people who need it, Connell notes, adding that information specialists are available in local senior centers to assist in this effort.

Don’t wait until a sudden health crisis forces you to shop around for long-term care services.  Start today Become a savvy shopper by increasing your knowledge and understanding of different long-term care service options and  their associated costs.  Learn more about government financing programs, specifically Medicare and Medicaid, and private senior financing with long-term care insurance and Medigap policies.