Tag Archives for Medicaid

State Lawmakers Ok Many Senior Initiatives  

Published in Pawtucket Times on July 7, 2003

 As this year’s legislative session came to an end, even the widely publicized tight state budget did not keep aging advocates from seeing some of their legislative proposals get passed by the House and Senate.

With the passage of companion legislative proposals (H 5841/ S 876), the state’s long-term care ombudsman law will be revised to reflect federal law, expanding the scope and authority of the state’s ombudsman program.

The new statute changes will require the state ombudsman to represent the interests of nursing facility residents or clients of service providers before governmental agencies.

The state ombudsman will also be charged with seeking administrative, legal and other remedies to protect the health, safety, welfare and rights of Ocean State seniors.

Another legislative proposal also got the thumbs-up from lawmakers. With the passing of companion proposals  H 5418/ S 506, new state funds totaling $ 300,000 will pay for nursing facility care of legal immigrant Rhode Island seniors who ae not eligible for Medicaid.

Meanwhile, the Rhode Island General Assembly provided that it sees the value in preventative medicine and how it can ultimately save health care dollars.

The Ocean State Adult Immunization Coalition requested $ 103,000 in new state funding to expand the coalition’s efforts to get the world out about the importance of seniors getting influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations.  While not receiving the whole loaf, lawmakers gave a half loaf instead – about $ 50,000.

With state dollars now allocated up front, large savings will be realized down the road. The cost of a flu shot is $ 15 and a pneumonia shot is $ 30.

If a senior is hospitalized, the average length of stay for an older person with influenza is five days, costing $ 12,000.  That’s a huge savings.

Lawmakers also passed legislation to make pharmaceutical drugs more affordable to Rhode Island seniors.

With the passing of companion proposals H 5237/S 374, persons eligible to participate in the Rhode Island Pharmaceutical Assistance to the Elderly Program (RIPAE) who also have prescription drug coverage through a health plan, will now be allowed to use RIPAE to pay for an individual prescription drug once they reach the maximum level of coverage for that drug.

Also, companion measures H 5239/ S378 passed, expanding RIPAE to allow persons age 55 to 61 on Social Security Disability Insurance to receive a 15 percent RIPAE co-payment in addition to their RIPAE drug discount rate.

As previously reported in All About Seniors, an 18-month study of .B.D.O. Seidman, a consulting firm hired by the state Department of Human Services, found that Rhode Island was underpaying its nursing facilities in excess of $ 30 million annually.

It seems that the General Assembly agreed with that report’s assessment and made a partial allocation of new Medicaid dollars to overhaul the state’s ailing Medicaid system.

With the passage of the state’s budget, nursing facilities will receive a total of $ 18.8 million in state and federal dollars – a three-year phase in will bring the total federal and state dollars to $30 million.

On the other hand, some aging agenda items went down in flames.

Aging advocates called on Gov. Don Carcieri and state lawmakers to allocate taxpayer dollars in the FY 2004 budget to allow more low-and moderate-income persons to choose Medicaid waiver-funded assisted living.

Although the federal government has already approved an additional 180 units in the state’s Medicaid assisted living waiver program, state funding of this initiative is required.

No funding in this year’s budget ensures that low-and- moderate income seniors will continue to be denied an option of choosing a less restrictive level of care, an option that higher income seniors have.

Additionally, lawmakers chose not to pass companion proposals (H 5478/ S 299) which would have allowed Rhode Island residents to buy prescription drugs from Canadian pharmacies, where they are routine cheaper.

Finally, in the aftermath of the tragic Station nightclub fire, the General Assembly and governor moved quickly to tighten regulations and to hire additional staffing at the Fire Marshal’s office to protect the patrons of bars and restaurants from fire.  However, beefing up the state Department of Health’s regulatory oversight of the Ocean State’s assisted living facilities, where 3,700 plus seniors reside, did not receive one dime in funding in the FY 2004 budget.

An assisted-living provider group, aging advocates, the Long-Term Coordinating Council, the state ombudsman and officials at the state Department of Health, have all called for new state dollars to fill one full-time surveyor position ( a nurse) to ensure that assisted living residences across Rhode Island are inspected on a timelier basis.

Last year, state lawmakers passed legislation to protect frail Rhode Island seniors who receive assisted-living services.

As this legislative session ends, the governor and General Assembly have failed to allocate the necessary funding in the FY 2004 state budget to fully implement state law that would result in the inspection of the state’s 72 assisted-living facilities and 155 assisted-living beds in nursing facilities in a timely manner.

According to the state’s Department of Health, another seven assisted-living projects are expected to be up and running over the next 18 months.

The ball now moves to Carcieri’s court to either use contingency funds in his office budget or to take administrative action to hire more assisted-living inspectors.

While it has been reported that the governor is amenable to using funds flushed out by his “fiscal fitness program” to pay for a new surveyor position, the time to act is now, rather than later.

Acting now to fix this policy glitch is sound public policy.  I am sure that Rhode Island seniors and taxpayers will agree.

Internet will soon be good source for information on nursing homes

Published in The Pawtucket Times, May 2003

A growing number of Americans are doing their shopping for products and services, via the Internet.  But if the federal government has its way consumers in five states will rely on Medicare and Medicaid programs and their family members, will be able to cruise the world wide web to find the best nursing facilities to meet their specific needs.

Rhode Island is among five states chosen by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for a pilot project that will identify collect, and publish nursing home quality information on the Internet for easy access and comparison of facilities.

The other states are Colorado, Maryland, Ohio and Washington.  Eventually, this federally-funded initiative will be expanded nationwide.

People covered by Medicare and Medicaid have the power to choose the best care to meet their individual needs, but they have to have more reliable information to choose quality care, HHS Secretary Tommy G. Thompson, who oversees the Medicare and Medicaid programs. “Our efforts will help beneficiaries all across the country to compare the performance of their local nursing homes, and will provide the recognition that high-quality nursing homes deserve”.

In April 2002, the newly compiled performance information becomes available online at www.medicare.gov and will also be disseminated through Rhode Island Quality Partners, an agency contracted by the federal government to oversee the quality of health services provided to Rhode Island Medicare beneficiaries.

So what information can consumers find when shopping for the right nursing facility on the world wide web?

Currently, the CMS’s website provides nursing facility-specific information compiled from state annual surveys.

As a result of this five state pilot project, consumers will be able to see data culled from the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized medical collection form that every nursing home is required to complete on every patient upon admission and on a regular schedule thereafter.

For those seeking a long-term placement, CMS will bring together comparative state-wide information that indicates quality care is being provided.  When shopping you will be able to find out how many residents are being physically restrained, how many have pressure sores, how many are taking anti-psychotic drugs without a psychiatric diagnosis, how many have lost weight, how many have acquired an infection, and finally how many residents can no longer take care of themselves.

For those seeking short-term stays after hospitalization, CMS will provide state-wide MDS data compiled from nursing facilities that can tell you how many residents are in pain, how many residents fail to recover from delirium, along with how many are re-hospitalized and improvement in walking.

Dr. David R. Gifford, principal clinical coordinator with Rhode Island Quality Partners, told All About Seniors that CMS chose Rhode Island for the pilot project because of the state’s interest in public reporting of consumer information.  He noted that CMS was aware of Lt. Gov. Charles Fogerty’s legislation, recently enacted that now requires reporting of nursing facility quality information.

“We’re very pleased to be involved in the pilot project because it allows us to help shape the national data dissemination effort,” Gifford adds.

How will consumers not computer savvy gain access CMS’s new quality measures?

Dr. Gifford notes that each state participating in the pilot project must develop other avenues for non-computer users to tap into the MDS data compiled on its website.

Roberta Hawkins, Executive Director of the Alliance for Better Long Term Care and the state’s ombudsman, applauds the new federal effort to help consumers in choosing nursing facilities.

However, Hawkins is concerned that the MDS does not always provide “insight into the personality of a nursing facility.”

“MDS won’t tell you if a facility’s staff are compassionate to residents.”  she says.  Additionally, the newly compiled CMSA information will not provide you with specifics about how some facilities specialize in taking care of ethnic populations.”  she added, specifically, if staff speak a foreign language, sever ethnic cuisine, or plan culturally-related activity programming.

Additionally, Hawkins notes that while CMS’s website may tell you how many persons have bed sores, a higher incidence of bed sores may only reflect that a newly admitted resident came to the facility with bed sores or that a facility specializes in taking care of that medical condition.

At best, internet information can only provide a snapshot of care being provided by facility staff, warns Hawkins.  “Today’s best nursing homes may become next weeks providers of poor care,” she adds, when key staff in leadership positions leave the facility.

Take advantage of CMS’s website to cull nursing facility specific information compiled from state annual surveys.

When in doubt, call the Alliance for Better Long-Term Care at 785-3340.

Fix the Nursing Facility Problem Once and For All

Published in Pawtucket Times on April 28, 2003

Forty-years ago, the Senate Aging Committee hearings put the spotlight on the poor care provided in the nation’s nursing facilities.

This month, the April 2003 special issue of “the Gerontologist” sends the troubling message that nationwide improvement in nursing facility care is not likely.

Despite substantial regulatory oversight, Joshua Wiener, of the Urban Institute said “quality of care in nursing homes remains problematic. Quality of care in nursing facilities remains a problem for which there are not simple solutions.”

Before this national crisis can e directly confronted, increased staffing and raising the wages of nursing facility workers appear to be necessary preconditions for improving care quality and should receive high priority, said Weiner. (Rhode Island nursing facility providers hold similar beliefs and have called on Gov. Don Carcieri and state lawmakers to provide the necessary funding to raise facility worker’s wages.

The article’s written by 14 prominent policy experts in this special issue – “The Challenges in Nursing Home Care” – address central concerns in nursing facility care and help provide answers to questions, such as how these facilities can be financed and how care can be delivered.

The articles in this issue are the result of a conference held at Florida State University that was sponsored in part by the National Institute on Aging.

Dr. Quadagno and Dr. Stahl, guest editors of this special issue, believe a major challenge at both the national and state levels concerns the effective recruitment, training and retention of certified nursing aides.  Nursing aides, they pointed out provide about 60 percent of total nursing hours to residents (Again, this observation has been delivered to lawmakers at numerous legislative hearings on Smith Hill).

Many experts who wrote articles in this special issue contend the overall quality of nursing facility care in America still remains poor.  There are serious ongoing quality problems.

And like the rest of the nation, Rhode Island’s facilities are having problems recruiting and retaining certified nursing aids and providing higher wages to them as they receive inadequate Medicaid reimbursement.

What can be done about it?

Simply put, improving the quality of care in Rhode Island nursing facilities is directly linked to getting adequate Medicaid funding. The state must pay a fair rate when facilities are required  to provide quality care to 10,000-plus vulnerable Ocean State seniors who require intensive 24-hour-a-day care.

“The Principes of Reimbursement for nursing facilities are grossly underfunded,” charged Hugh Hall, president of the Rhode Island Health Care Association (RIHCA), a state-wide trade group representing nursing facility providers.

Hall, who is the administrator of the Cherry Hill Manor Nursing & rehabilitation Center in Johnston, estimated only two percent of the state’s nursing facilities are receiving adequate Medicaid reimbursement to cover their true costs of care.

Hall said that unless reimbursement is addressed swiftly, the quality of care delivered by facilities will begin to suffer the effects of the continued lack of attention of state policy makers.

“There is always another need for state tax dollars to be spent elsewhere,” Hall said, recognizing the growing number of special interest groups, who approach the General Assembly each year.

“Hopefully, it will be spent on where it is needed most, on the state’s frailest citizens,” he said, noting that “if the state does not spend it on them, who will?”

According to Alfred Santos, RIHCA’s executive director, the General Assembly is considering legislation (H 5803/S 0901) that would revise the state’s Principles of Reimbursement. Passage would begin to address the inadequate funding of the state’s nursing facilities, he said.

The legislative proposals, referred to the House and Senate Finance Committees, reflect the findings of an 18-month study of B.D.O Seidman, a consulting firm hired by the Department of Human Services to review and recommend fixest to the state’s flawed reimbursement system. Santos said one of the findings of this study was the state was underpaying facilities in excess of $ 30 million annually.

It’s time to fix the state’s flawed Medicaid reimbursement system once and for all. A Band-aid solution is not the appropriate approach considering the growing number of Ocean State seniors who will require higher levels of intensive care.

At an AARP  debate in gubernatorial candidates last September, this writer asked Carcieri if he would budget $ 15 million to overhaul the existing Medicaid payment system. The additional funding would greatly improve the quality of care and services provided to 10,000-plus nursing facility residents.

With this additional $ 15 million in state funding, the federal government would pick up another $ 15 million for a total of $ 30 million. This funding would allow Rhode Island facilities to provide quality care.

Candidate Carcieri acknowledged it would be difficult to find $ 15 million to fix the system because of the state’s looming budget deficit.

But there may be a light at the end of the tunnel. When the dust settles on the governor’s “Big Audit,” state funds may be identified and targeted toward ratcheting up the state’s inadequate reimbursement rate.

Combine these newly discovered funds with new tx revenues generated from the Lincoln greyhound track and you might just have the $15 million in state funds required to bring in millions of federal dollars.

For those Rhode Island seniors who are currently in nursing facilities, and for their children and grandchildren who may unfortunately require that intensive level of care, lawmakers must fix the payment problem once and for all.

Hopefully, Carcieri, along with the General Assembly, will not allow the B.D.O. Seidman report’s recommendations on fixing the state’s Medicaid payment system to sit on the dusty shelf in the Department of Human Services.

If that happens, what a waste of taxpayer money.