Tag Archives for Generations United

National Groups Call for Making Pneumonia Vaccines Available to Age 50 and Over Adults

Published in RINewsToday on October 21, 2024

Within days, a loose coalition of 21 advocacy groups are pushing for the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions (CDC)’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which meets on Oct. 23 and Oct. 24, to lower the routine age-based recommendation for all pneumonia vaccines to age 50. 

These groups, working on behalf of millions of older Americans, immunocompromised, underserved patient populations and consumers, see the value of increasing the accessibility of effective vaccines for respiratory viruses. 

 ACIP’s October agenda may include a vote on lowering the routine, age-based recommendation for pneumonia vaccines to add those ages 50 to 64 to the existing two groups in the age-based recommendation, those under 5 and over 65.

 According to Bob Blancato, Executive Director of the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs (NANASP), CDC typically holds three ACIP meetings each year with one occurring in February, one in June and one in October. “The upcoming meeting is especially critical because we are right in the middle of respiratory season, so any change they make to their recommendation can greatly benefit older Americans while the threat of pneumonia is very much still circulating in our environments,” he says.

“Also, just given the fact that there are only three meetings a year, it is important that the committee take the opportunities to improve policies during each meeting so we aren’t further restricting access to protections that so many in our population will benefit from,” adds Blancato.

This coalition, composed of aging, consumer, health and multicultural advocacy groups, calls for federal policies that support the well-being of older adults that remove barriers to accessing innovative and effective vaccines, given the real benefits they offer in preventing serious health outcomes, says Blancato.

 Preventing Pneumococcal Disease in Adults

According to CDC, pneumococcal pneumonia, meningitis, and bloodstream infections (sepsis) kills tens of thousands older Americans each year, including thousands of older adults age 54 and over.

CDC estimates that 150,000 older Americans are hospitalized with pneumococcal pneumonia each year.  About 1 in 20 individuals who get pneumococcal pneumonia will die.  The death rate is higher for those individuals age 65 and older.

Persons surviving pneumococcal meningitis can suffer from hearing loss, seizures, blindness, and paralysis, says CDC.  For those afflicted with pneumococcal bloodstream infections, treatments require hospitalization, often requiring weeks or months of treatment before returning to normal activities.

Getting conjugate and polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines can reduce a person’’s chance of contracting or dying from pneumococcal disease, notes CDC.

 Protecting the Older At-Risk Ethnic Population

 The Oct. 15 letter to ACIP, co-authored by the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs (NANASP), National Caucus and  Center on Black Aging (NCBA) and the National Hispanic Council on Aging (NHCOA), stated that lowering the age would increase vaccination rates for at-risk ethnic populations.  Over 53 percent of Black, 41 percent of Hispanic, 50.2 percent of Asian Americans have been vaccinated for pneumonia, compared to 69 percent of White adults, noted the correspondence. It also stressed that by offering a vaccine to persons ages 50 to 64, who experience a decline in their immune system, would receive protection while their immune systems are still able to produce a robust response.

 “It has been over three years since ACIP first presented data at the June 2021 meeting showing that lowering the age-based recommendation would improve vaccine equity,” said NANASP’s Blancato. “There is no reason to delay this further,” he says.

“Too many Black and Hispanic individuals face chronic illnesses like diabetes, heart disease and cancer, due to lack of preventable health care early in life. Far too many are already sick by the time they are currently eligible for pneumococcal vaccinations,” said Yanira Cruz, President and CEO of the National Hispanic Council on Aging (NHCOA), “Getting more adults in these populations vaccinated at a younger age is a great step forward in vaccine equity”.

“I’ve had pneumonia and it knocked me out for nearly three months,” said Karyne Jones, President and CEO of National Caucus and Center on Black Aging (NCBA). “I contracted the disease when I was 64 – I know first-hand the value of getting younger people vaccinated against this deadly disease.  I ask members of ACIP to fully support lowering the recommendation to age 50 for all adults for all available pneumococcal vaccines.”

In addition to the group letter, an online petition organized by NANASP has garnered more than five thousand signatures from Americans across the nation.

“As we begin the respiratory disease season, our policies should be about promoting protection versus limiting across to vaccines.  The support for lowering the age-based recommendation is clearly there so now is the time for ACIP to act,” continued Blancato.

If ACIP lowers the recommended age of providing vaccinations to persons age 50 and over, commercial plans and Medicaid would be mandated to cover its cost.  Medicaid plans would be required cover the costs for low-income recipients as soon as the recommendation is approved by the CDC Director – like for Medicare Part D plans.

By offering coverage of pneumococcal vaccinations, to persons ages 50 to 64, would offer critical protections to these individuals before their immune system wanes.  This cost-effective approach would reduce serious illness, ultimately reducing hospitalization and death. 

The CDC should streamline and lower the age recommendations for routine pneumococcal vaccinations, starting at age 50.  It’s a no-brainer decision. 

Here is a listing of groups signing correspondence to CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices: National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs; National Caucus and Center on Black Aging; National Hispanic Council on Aging; Alliance for Aging Research; ALS Association; American Public Health Association; American Society on Aging; COPD Foundation; Generations United; HealthHIV; HealthyWomen; National Alliance for Caregiving; National Consumers League; National Grange; National Hispanic Health Foundation; National Minority Quality Forum; Sepsis Alliance; The American Society of Consultant Pharmacists; USAging; US Black Chambers, Inc.; and Vasculitis Foundation.

House Subcommittee Panel Makes Call for Expanding, Strengthening Social Security

Published in the Woonsocket Call on March 23, 2019

So it goes, to the victor goes the spoils. Over a week ago, House Democratic leadership, now controlling the legislative agenda, pushed to strengthen and expand benefits for the nation’s Social Security program.

With the 116th Congress kicking off on Jan. 2, 2019, as the majority party, the Democrats took over the legislative reins of the House of Representatives from the Republicans, who had held the majority and legislative control of the lower chamber since 2011. Now being in power allows Democratic leadership to control which bills reach the floor for a vote. In this new Congress, legislation reflecting the GOP’s philosophy as to how to fix Social Security (by privatizing the retirement program, cutting benefits, raising the retirement age, even reducing cost-of-living adjustments or lowering earned benefits) would be blocked by Democratic leadership.

Congress Puts Spotlight on Social Security

Last week, Social Security got a full and fair hearing before the House Ways and Means Social Security subcommittee.

Rep. John B. Larson (D-Conn.), chairing the House Ways and Means Social Security subcommittee, held a series of panel hearings, calling for the strengthening and protecting the nation’s Social Security program.

“What we’re addressing in these hearings is that Congress hasn’t paid enough attention to Social Security to make sure it’s actuarially sound,” he said, in his opening statement for the March 12th hearing, entitled “Protecting and Improving Social Security: Enhancing Social Security to Strengthen the Middle Class.”

According to Larson, more than 62 million Americans are already receiving Social Security benefits.

“We have a responsibility to act to strengthen this program for them,” he added. “Not to act will amount to a 25 percent benefit cut come 2034. In other words, for the person who was making $50,000 a year throughout their working career, they would actually be living at a poverty level in terms of a benefit that they would receive after these cuts,” he said.

“Not only do we need to work to protect the program, but we need a solution to make the program, as the actuaries say, “sustainably solvent,” or in other words, making sure Social Security remains strong throughout this century, not just for seniors, but for millennials too,” added Larson.

Joan Ruff, AARP’s chair of the Board, testified, saying, “Social Security is the only lifetime, inflation-protected, guaranteed source of retirement income that most Americans will have. It is the foundation of retirement security that keeps millions of older Americans out of poverty and allows them to live independently. But Social Security also provides some measure of economic security for families who face a loss of income because of the disability or the death of a wage earner. We often do not think of Social Security as a family income protection plan—yet that is exactly what it is.”

Other witnesses testified on the importance of Social Security benefits and how it provides the middle class with economic security, especially women and minorities.

One day later, Larson convened a second hearing entitled, “Protecting and Improving Social Security: Benefit Enhancements.” The purpose of holding the hearings, said Larson, was to “shine a bright light on all of the proposals to secure Social Security that will help the American people.”

Democrats Unveil Fix for Social Security

Larson also used the subcommittee panel hearing as a bully pulpit to promote his legislation, H.R. 860, “The Social Security 2100 Act.” Specifically, the bill’s eight provisions expand benefits for 62 million Social Security beneficiaries. Larson’s bill would provide an across-the-board benefit increase for current and new beneficiaries that is the equivalent of 2 percent of the average benefit. It also calls for an improved cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), through adopting a CPI-E formula, that takes into account the true costs (include health care expenses) incurred by seniors and a stronger minimum benefit set at 25 percent above the poverty line, tied to their wage levels to ensure that the minimum benefit does not fall behind. Finally, the bill would ensure that any increase in benefits from the bill do not result in a reduction in SSI benefits or loss of eligibility for Medicaid or Children’s Health Insurance Program. Finally, 12 million Social Security recipients would receive a tax cut through the eliminating the tax on their benefits.

At this time, H.R. 860 has 203 House Democrats cosponsors (including Rhode Island Representatives David N. Cicilline and James R. Langevin). Passage of the legislation requires only a simple majority vote of 218 lawmakers. With 235 Democratic lawmakers sitting in this chamber, it is expected to pass.

But, with the Senate-controlled by Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and his GOP caucus, it will be difficult for Senators Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) to see their companion measure make it reach the Senate floor for consideration.

Larson’s first two hearings are the first in a series of hearings on Protecting and Improving Social Security. One more hearing will be scheduled with the date to be determined. After these hearings, H.R. 860 will most likely be marked up by the Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee and full Committee before it heads to the House floor for a vote.

Enhancing Social Security Benefits

Lead-off witness Max Richtman, president of the Washington, D.C.-based National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare (NCPSSM), restated his aging advocacy group’s support for Larson’s Social Security bill, H.R. 860, which enhances the retirement programs benefits and ensures its long-term solvency.

“Since the program’s creation 84-years ago, Social Security has been – and is- and enormously successful program which is essential to the retirement of the vast majority of Americans. While [the] benefits are modest, Social Security is still the single largest source of income for retired American’s. To ensure the program’s continued success, it is vitally important that long-term solvency be restored, and that Social Security benefits be improved to meet the needs of all Americans,” says Richtman.

Social Security Advocates joined Richtman at the witness table, too.

Elizabeth Marafino, president of the Connecticut Alliance of Retired Americans (from Larson’s home state), stated that Social Security is important to older Connecticut residents, making this statement more personal by sharing how her maternal grandmother, mother of six and a widow at the age of fifty, was glad to receive her husband’s social security check because it literally kept her out of the poor house.

Marafino noted, “The traditional three-legged stool of pension, personal savings, and social security is deteriorating. The ‘pension’ leg of the stool has been disappearing, eroding retirement security and making Social Security even more important. Along with the high cost of prescription drugs putting pressure on seniors’ finances, (these factors make) the need to increase Social Security benefits urgent.”

Abigail Zapote, Director of Latinos for a Secure Retirement, testified that boosting Social Security benefits is crucial to the Latino population, whose average Social Security checks are lower than other Americans. “Latinos depend on Social Security more than other groups because they tend to have lower lifetime income, longer life expectancies, higher incidence of disability and larger families,” she said.

Enhancing benefits can help older women, too, testified Joan Entmacher, a Senior Fellow at the
National Academy of Social Insurance. “Social Security is the foundation of retirement security for most Americans, but it is especially important for women,” she says, noting that women rely more on their Social Security checks than men do, even though their Social Security benefits are lower. She pointed out that the average retirement benefit for women is only 80 percent of men, making women even more reliant on Social Security, she said.

“Adjusting the regular benefit formula to make it more progressive would increase benefits for all workers, but lower lifetime earners, including women and people of color, would receive the largest percentage increases,” says Entmacher. To boost retirement benefits, she calls for the creation of caregiver credits (the majority of caregivers are women) who take off from their jobs to care for family members.

Finally, Donna Butts, the Executive Director of Generations United, testified that Social Security was important for all generations. ““For more than 80 years Social Security has been the premier example of a policy designed to secure and insure the well-being of individuals and their families. “For many it makes the difference between putting food on the table and deciding whether grandma or junior eat tonight,” she says.

The Beginning of an Honest Policy Debate

According to a NCPSSM blog posted on March 15th, “Republicans on the subcommittee, now in the minority for the first time in 8 years, appeared to be less combative than in the past.”

“This was a richer dialogue about the philosophical differences about Social Security than we’ve had in a long time,” observed National Committee legislative director, Dan Adcock in the blog posting. “There was a quest to figure out what each side could live with,” he says.

Stay tuned.

H