Tag Archives for COLA

Retirees reflect on financial fragility of retirement

Published in RINewsToday on December 9, 2024

Literally just hot off the press… the Los Angeles, California-based nonprofit Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies® (TCRS) in collaboration with Transamerica Institute®, released the findings of its 24 Annual Transamerica Retirement survey.  Considered to be one of the largest and longest running annual surveys of its kind, its findings paint a picture of being retired in America.

Retiree life in the post-pandemic economy examines the health and well-being, personal finances, and retirement security of U.S. retirees no longer working. The report’s analysis was prepared by the research team at Transamerica Institute and TCRS. The 25-minute online survey was conducted within the U.S. by The Harris Poll on behalf of Transamerica Institute between September 14 and October 23, 2023, among a nationally representative sample of 10,002 people, including a subsample of 2,404 retirees who are retired and do not work.

Shedding light on the many facets of retirement

According to TCRS’s retirement survey, released on Nov. 26th, fewer than one in four retirees (23%) say they are very confident and able to maintain a comfortable lifestyle throughout their retirement.

“Retirement brings freedom and time for personal pursuits,” said Catherine Collinson, CEO and president of Transamerica Institute and TCRS in a statement announcing the release of the 76-page report. “However, retirees are living on a fixed income with limited financial resources. Many would be unable to withstand a major financial shock, such as the need to pay for long-term care. Retirees’ fragile financial situation serves as a cautionary tale that underscores the imperative for strengthening our retirement system,” she says.

“Many retirees may wonder what they could have done differently to save and plan for retirement, and many may feel they have done everything right but still came up short,” adds Collinson. “In reality, over their working careers, the world has changed, the retirement landscape has evolved, and the need to self-fund a greater portion of one’s retirement income has intensified,” she said.  

Based on the report’s findings, retirees are active and engaged in meaningful ways. As retirees, they are:

·         spending more time with family and friends (58%)

·         pursuing hobbies (43%)

·         traveling (36%)

·         taking care of their grandchildren (19%)

·         doing volunteer work (16%)

·         caregiving (10%)

Although most retirees express a positive feeling about life, others say they are distressed.  Most retirees say they are:

·         generally happy (89%)

·         have close relationships with family and friends (88%)

·         enjoying life (86%)

·         have a positive view of aging (79%)

·         have a strong sense of purpose (79%)

·         have an active social life (53%)

However, three in 10 retirees (30%) have financial trouble in making ends meet, 27% indicate they often feel unmotivated and overwhelmed, 24% often feel anxious and depressed, and 17% are isolated and lonely.

Retirees who retired before the age of 65 are cutting short their working years and income, a situation that could inevitably lead to a decrease in their retirement income. Almost six in 10 retirees say they retired sooner than planned (58%) and, among them, almost half did so for personal health-related reasons (46%) and employment-related issues (43%), while 20% did so for family-related reasons. Only one in five (21%) retired early because they were financially able.

Retirees are struggling to juggle competing financial priorities and debt, the findings indicate. Retirees’ say their current top financial priorities include

·         building emergency savings (31%)

·         just getting by to cover basic living expenses (29%)

·         continuing to save for retirement (24%)

·         paying off one or more forms of debt as a current financial priority (45%)

o    paying off credit cards (30%), paying off mortgages (20%), paying off other consumer debt (10%), and paying off student loans (3%).

The survey found that the retiree’s greatest retirement fears centered around money and health issues.  Forty-two percent expressed fear that Social Security will be reduced or may cease to exist in the future.  Almost six in 10 retirees (58%) expect Social Security to be their primary source of income throughout their retirement, reinforcing their view that the retirement program is the cornerstone of their retirement income.

Retiring before age 65 impacts your Social Security benefit. Retirees currently receiving Social Security started at age 63 (median) which translates to a lower monthly benefit than if they had waited until their full retirement age of 66 or 67, depending on the year they were born. Only 4% of retirees waited until age 70 or later which would have maximized their monthly benefit, noted the report.

Additionally, the retirees fear declining health that requires long-term care (37%), losing their independence (32%), outliving their savings and investments (32%), and cognitive decline, dementia, or Alzheimer’s (28%).

Fear of unanticipated costly long-term care

Only 13% of retirees are very confident they would be able to afford long-term care, if needed – and only 13% have long-term care insurance, noted the findings. When asked if their health declines and they need help with daily activities and/or nursing care, almost half of retirees (48%) say they plan to rely on family members and friends to provide such care. Moreover, relatively few retirees have codified their wishes in legal documents such as powers of attorney and advance directives.

Annual Income

The survey respondents had an annual household income of $55,000 (estimated median) as of late 2023 with more than one-third of retirees (36%) having an income of less than $50,000. Retirees’ household savings excluding home equity were $71,000 (estimated median) in 2023.

Untapped opportunities might be helpful to retirees in strengthening their finances.The researchers say that retirees need to be fully engaged in financial planning or taking steps that could improve their overall situation. Only 24% indicate they have “a lot” of working knowledge about personal finance, 19% have a financial strategy for retirement in the form of a written plan, and just 7% frequently discuss saving, investing, and retirement planning with family and close friends. Only one in three (33%) use a professional financial advisor.

“Many retirees may wonder what they could have done differently to save and plan for retirement, and many may feel they have done everything right but still came up short,” said Collinson. “In reality, over their working careers, the world has changed, the retirement landscape has evolved, and the need to self-fund a greater portion of one’s retirement income has intensified.”

Thoughts about Retirement in the Ocean State    

“I can confidently say there’s less road ahead to retirement than there is behind me,” quips Kemal Saatcioglu, Ph.D., associate professor and chair of the Economics and Finance Department at Rhode Island College (RIC). “Going through this report was an eye opener even for me and I came away with a mix of inspiration, awareness, and a sense of urgency,” he says.

“Asnoted in this report, the retirees’ ability to find purpose, freedom, and joy, even amid challenges shows the resiliency and flexibility we all possess, notes the RIC Professor.  “Knowing that many retirees successfully navigate these waters is inspiring and is a motivator for getting into retirement planning with confidence,” he adds.

According to Saatcioglu, the report is a wake-up call for retirees. The data clearly indicates that they, in general, can be better prepared.  “The statistics about limited savings, reliance on Social Security, and the lack of written financial plans might push those of us nearing retirement to re-evaluate our financial readiness. The survey data will likely create motivation to consult a financial advisor to ensure better use of available resources,” he says. 

Saatcioglu calls the points about life expectancy and the length of retirement striking. “While it may be daunting at first to consider how 15 to 20 years could stretch retirement savings, prioritizing strategies for sustainability, such as long-term care insurance or budgeting for healthcare costs are great steps to take,” he says, especially the importance of mental health and stress management also encourages a more holistic view of our overall well-being.

Retirees must recognize local challenges and strengths. “Granted Rhode Island is not the most retirement friendly state. Higher costs of living, especially on housing, utilities, and food, and less than a friendly tax environment are challenges but knowing about them ahead of time and taking steps early on can mitigate those challenges,” recommends Saatcioglu.

Finally, Saatcioglu believes that the survey creates a motivation to take action—whether it’s updating financial plans, discussing retirement goals with family, or exploring community resources. Retirement can be an exciting, and rather long, stage of life, as long as proactive steps are taken now.

Maureen Maigret, Policy Advisor for the Senior Agenda Coalition, notes that the findings of the Transamerica report align with what older Rhode Islanders are concerned with in terms of their economic security, especially the  cost of healthcare and housing, worries about being able to afford any needed long-term services and a lack of planning to meet those need.  “Adding to those worries is uncertainty about possible proposed changes from a new federal administration for two of the most valuable programs for older adults – Social Security and Medicare,” she says.

According to Maigret, the Senior Agenda Coalition of RI (SACRI) has advocated to enhance the economic security of older Rhode Islanders.  She stated that a recent SACRI survey found the costs for health care and housing were priority issues for the state’s older population.  “That’s why we will continue to work in 2025 to expand the Medicare Savings Program to increase its income eligibility so lower-income older adults and persons on Medicare will be able to get their Medicare Part B premium covered and in some cases co-payments,” she says, also stressing the importance of ensurng that the housing bond funds are targeted toward developing more affordable housing options for older adults.  

“I deeply appreciate the insights in this report. It highlights the importance of proactive retirement planning and the emotional and financial complexities retirees face in the post-pandemic economy,” says Josh Wells, CEO of The Retirement Factory, who stresses the importance of balancing the emotional and financial aspects of retirement.

According to Wells, retirees often feel the weight of navigating Social Security decisions or managing healthcare costs. This report underscores that many retirees are unsure about these critical choices, with only 7% frequently discussing retirement planning with family or friends and just 33% using a financial advisor. ”It’s a powerful reminder that education and open dialogue are key to achieving retirement confidence,” he says.

“Rhode Island retirees exemplify resilience and adaptability in the face of change,” says Wells.  “The report highlights that 70% of retirees feel confident about maintaining a comfortable lifestyle, even amidst financial and health challenges. For Ocean State retirees, this confidence is bolstered by state-specific benefits such as the ability to exclude up to $20,000 of retirement income from state taxes for those at full retirement age and meeting income thresholds, as well as property tax relief of up to $600 for eligible seniors with limited incomes,” he says, noting that these program reflect “the state’s commitment to supporting its senior population, enabling retirees to plan carefully, stay connected to their communities, and enjoy a fulfilling retirement.”

Like the report’s findings, RI retirees are juggling competing financial priorities, especially with only a minimal 2024 increase in their ERSRI pension, says Sandra Paquette, representing the Advocates for Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) Restoration and Pension Reform. Of equal, often ignored significance, these retirees have been deprived of 13 years of potential savings,” she says.

“By unjustly removing a COLA, the former teachers, state workers and some municipal employees  have been plunged into survival mode, where limited, fixed incomes are barely sufficient to cover necessities and essentials. In many instances, choices must be made among prescriptions, heating and food– by individuals who spent a lifetime of service, and of contributing  to their retirement benefits,” adds Paquette.

For a copy of Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies’ new report, go to https://www.transamericainstitute.org/research/publications/details/retiree-life-in-the-post-pandemic-economy-2024.

Social Security 2025 COLA expected to be small increase 

Published in RINewsToday on September 16, 2024

Stay tuned… Next year’s cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) will be announced by the Social Security Administration (SSA) in mid-October, upon the release of September’s annual inflation adjustment data.  SSA’s COLA for 2025 will be reflected in beneficiary checks starting in January of that year. Like clockwork, this happens annually, although beneficiaries may see their payments occasionally arrive a few days early due to holidays or weekends. 

The Senior Citizen’s League (TSCL) releases its COLA projections each month. The official COLA is determined by the Labor Bureau’s revised CPI-W data from July, August and September.

Some say SSA’s 2025 COLA is “Chump Change”

With one month left, TSCL’s latest COLA model results, released on Sept. 11, 2024, predicts that next year’s COLA will be 2.5 % based on a decline from 2.9% to 2.5% in consumer price data. While 2.5% is lower than the 3.2% received in 2024, that wouldn’t be far from the historical norm. The COLA has averaged about 2.6% over the past 20 years. It went as low as 0.0% in 2010, 2011, and 2016 and as high as 8.7% in 2023.

According to TSCL, by law, the annual inflation adjustment is based on the average inflation during July, August, and September as measured by the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). The Bureau of Labor Statistics averages the CPI-W for these three months and then compares it with the same timeframe from the previous year, says the Alexandria-based nonprofit advocacy group whose mission is to protect Social Security, Medicare, and veteran or military retiree benefits.  

TSCL’s COLA latest analysis findings indicates that next year’s COLA of 2.5% would raise the average monthly benefit for retired workers of $1,920 by $48 or about $564 annually. The modest increase will not enable seniors to cover increasing cost of living expenses (including food, clothing, transportation, energy, and shelter costs).  “Rising grocery prices is creating food insecurity for many retirees. Feeding America estimated that 5.5 million Americans age 60 and above suffered from food insecurity in 2021, in the most recent study available on the subject, and that number is likely higher today,” note the researchers.

“Due to a higher cost of living, older Americans are using more and more of their income each month just to get by compared to a year ago. “Sixty-five percent of seniors reported monthly expenses of at least $2,000, up from 55% in 2023,” says TSCL’s COLA analysis, noting that statistical testing shows that there’s almost no chance that this gap is due to noisy survey variation. (The 2024 survey had 2,129 respondents; 2023 had 2,258 respondents.)

But low-income seniors aren’t the only ones who have seen their expenses rise, either, say the researchers, noting that more seniors are spending at least $4,000 or $6,000 per month compared to 2023, too, while fewer are able to get by on $1,000 or less. TSCL says that a rise in monthly expenses wouldn’t be much of an issue if seniors’ higher expenses were going to fun activities things, like activities with their grandchildren, or discretionary costs, like bucket-list vacations. However, this is not the case, says the Social Security advocacy group.  “Nearly 80% of senior households in the 2024 survey reported that their monthly budget for essential items like food, housing, and prescription drugs had increased over the last 12 months, with 63% saying they’re worried that their income won’t be enough to cover these basic costs in the coming months,” says the analysis findings.

Over the years, TSCL, along with other aging advocacy groups including the National Committee to Protect Social Security (NCPSSM) and Social Security Works, have called for higher COLAs.

Calls for Congress to change current COLA formula.

Last March, in correspondence to Sen. Bob Casey, Jr. (D-PA), chairman of the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, NCPSSM, the Washington DC based Social Security advocacy group endorsed Casey’s legislative proposal, S. 3974, entitled the “Boosting Benefits and COLAs for Seniors Act.”  The proposal has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee.

Specifically, Casey’s legislative proposal, introduced March 19, 2024, would direct SSA to adjust benefits based on CPI-E rather than CPI-W, if CPI-E would result in a larger increase in benefits. The Bureau of Labor Statistics  (BLS) would calculate and publish the CPI-E on a monthly basis. The Senator believes it would be the most accurate measure of the real effect of inflation on the goods and services that are purchased by America’s seniors.

In NCPSSM’s correspondence, CEO and President Max Richtman strongly supported Casey’s call for requiring BLS to change the way it calculates SSA’s annual COLAs, using a CPI-E formula.

According to Richtman, SSA’s current formula for calculating COLAs is based upon the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), which is a measurement by the BLS of the changes in the prices paid for a market basket of goods and services purchased by urban wage earners and clerical workers.

“The current CPI-W has fallen far short of providing needed inflation protection because it fails to adequately measure the spending patterns of seniors,” says Richtman in his endorsement of Seniors typically spend more on out-of-pocket health care costs than other Americans, and in most years, the cost of health care rises more quickly than general inflation,” he says. “We believe adoption of your bill would go a long way toward protecting those on fixed incomes from the ravages of inflation,” says Richtman.

The following organizations have endorsed S. 3974: Arc of the United States; Alliance for Retired Americans; American Federation of Government Employees; American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; California Alliance for Retired Americans; Justice in Aging; National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare; National Education Association; National Organization of Social Security Claimants Representatives; Social Security Works; Strengthen Social Security Coalition.

While former President Donald Trump and Vice-President Kamala Harris have both pledged to protect Social Security, nether have put out a specific plan to keep America’s retirement program solvent.

According to the last Social Security Trustees report, the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance  trust fund is projected to be depleted by 2033 at which point SSA will be forced to make a 21 percent across the board reduction.  The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that this would be a $16, 500 cut in annual benefits for a typical dual-income couple retiring at the time of trust fund depletion. 

When the dust settles after the upcoming presidential election, the new president must make it a priority to hammer out a bipartisan fix along with pushing for requiring BLS to use the CPI-E Formula to accurately predict the impact of inflation on America’s retirees. 

Next November, Let Seniors Vote on Social Security Fixes  

Published in RINewsToday on May 13, 2024

By Herb Weiss

The recently released 2024 Social Security and Medicare Trustees report shows an improved outlook for these programs. This year’s projections show that Social Security can pay its benefits and cover administrative costs now until 2035, one year longer than projected in last year’s report. But, after that, it can only cover 83 percent of benefits, even if Congress fails to take no action to fix the program to ensure its financial viability.  

Medicare’s fiscal health improves even more, says the Medicare Trustees Report. It projects that the program’s Part A (Hospital) fund will be able to pay 100% of scheduled benefits until 2036 — a full five years later than estimated by the trustees last year. 

Under the Social Security Act of 1935, the Board of Trustees is required to submit the annual reports on the current and projected financial status of the trust funds to Congress on April 1 each year. 

It’s Time for Congress to Protect Social Security

“This year’s report is a measure of good news,” says Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, in a statement recognizing the impact of “strong economic that have yielded impressive wage growth, historic job creation and a steady, low unemployment rate.”  

“So long as Americans across our country continue to work, Social Security can — and will — continue to pay benefits,” says O’Malley, calling on Congress to take action to ensure the financial viability of the Trust Fund “into the foreseeable future just as it did I the past on a bipartisan basis.”  

“I will continue to urge Congress to protect and support Social Security and restore the growth of the funds. Whether Congress chooses to eliminate the shortfall by increasing revenue, reducing benefits, or some combination, is a matter of political preference, not affordability,” observes O’Malley, noting that there are several legislative proposals that address the shortfall without benefit cuts — it should debate and vote on these and any other proposals. 

Social Security Advocacy Groups. Key GOP Lawmaker Issue Statements 

With the May 6 release of the 2024 Social Security and Medicare Trustees report, statements were generated by Social Security advocacy groups and Congressional lawmakers to give their take on the projections. 

Even with the report pushing back the expected depletion dates for Social Security and Medicare, Max Richtman, President & CEO, National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare (NCPSSM) called for Congress to immediately act to strengthen the Social Security program for the 67 million beneficiaries. “We cannot afford to wait to take action until the trust fund is mere months from insolvency, as Congress did in 1983.  The sooner Congress acts, the less painful the remedies will be, says Richtman.

In responding to comments that Social Security is going ‘bankrupt, Richtman says: “Revenue always will flow into Social Security from workers’ payroll contributions, so the program will never be ‘broke.’ But no one wants seniors to suffer an automatic 17% benefit cut in 2035, so Congress must act deliberately, but not recklessly.  A bad deal driven by cuts to earned benefits could be worse than no deal at all.” 

Richtman warns that seniors will take a devastating financial hit if Congress is forced to make cuts in 2035. “Average Social Security benefits are already very modest — about $23,000 per year, which is only $3,000 higher than the federal poverty line for a household of two,” he says, noting that wealthier beneficiaries can afford to contribute more to the program without hurting them financially. 

“Social Security has an accumulated surplus of $2.79 trillion. It is 90 percent funded for the next quarter century, 83 percent for the next half century, and 81 percent for the next three quarters of a century. At the end of the century, in 2100,” says Nancy Altman, President of Social Security Works, noting that the program is projected to cost just 6.1 percent of gross domestic product (“GDP”). 

Like the SSA Commissioner and NCPSSM’s Richtman, and Altman urges Congress to act sooner rather than later to ensure that Social Security can pay full benefits for generations to come, along with expanding Social Security’s modest benefits. “That will restore one of the most important benefits Social Security is intended to provide to the American people — a sense of security,” she says.

As to Medicare, the released report notes the life expectancy for Medicare part A Trust Fund is extended another five years. 

“It’s great news that the Part A trust fund has an additional FIVE years before it becomes depleted, partly because of the unexpected strength of the U.S. economy.  But current and future seniors expect action to keep the trust fund solvent for the long-term,” said Richtman.

“We support President Biden’s plan to strengthen Medicare’s finances, as laid out in his FY 2024 and 2025 budgets,” says Richtman, noting that the president’s plan would bring more revenue into the program, rather than cutting benefits as some Republicans have proposed.  “Building on the prescription drug pricing reforms in the Inflation Reduction Act, the President’s budget proposal would lower Medicare’s costs — and some of those savings would be used to extend the solvency of the Part A trust fund,” he says.

According to Richtman, beyond trust fund solvency, the Trustees reported that the standard Medicare Part B premium will rise next year to $185 per month – a $20 or 6 percent monthly increase. “Any premium increase is a burden to seniors living on fixed incomes, who too often must choose between paying monthly bills or filling prescriptions and getting proper health care.  Seniors need relief from rising premiums and skyrocketing out-of-pocket health care costs. Fortunately, the Biden administration is taking steps to reduce those costs,” said Richtman.

Key GOP Chair  Responds to Trustee Reports

Chairman Jodey Arrington (R-TX), of the House Budget Committee, quickly released a statement, responding to the release of the 2024 Social Security and Medicare Trustees report.

According to Arrington, the House Budget Committee’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Budget, while not making any changes to Social Security or Medicare benefits, provides a way to prod Congress and the President to address the fiscal insolvency of these programs. The Budget Committee has also reported the Fiscal Commission Act, which will also give Congress the tools it needs to save and strengthen these vital programs,” he noted.

“We have the highest levels of indebtedness in our nation’s history, an inflationary and anemic economy, and the two most important senior safety net programs facing insolvency, says Arrington, noting that this year’s trustees report “only reiterates why we need a bipartisan Fiscal Commission to address the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds and the $140 trillion unfunded liability on America’s balance sheet.”

“Republicans and Democrats have both proven they will not fix Social Security and Medicare on their own. We must put our seniors and country first and work together to find a solution,” he charges. “Doing nothing is condemning our seniors to automatic benefit cuts and our country to a future debt crisis,” he says.

Fixing Social Security…A Difference in Perspective.

Both NCPSSM and Social Security Works strongly endorse financially shoring up Social Security by bringing in more money into the trust fund by increasing the payroll wage-cap to require higher-income beneficiaries to pay a higher Social Security payroll tax.  Both Social Security advocacy groups endorse Rep. John Larson’s (D-CT) Social Security 2100 Act, a legislative proposal would maintain the current payroll wage cap (currently set at $168,600), but subjecting wages $400,000 and above to payroll taxes, as well — and dedicating some of high-earners’ investment income to Social Security. 

On the other hand, Republican lawmakers call for cutting earned benefits of younger workers by raising the full-retirement age, means-testing, and replacing the exiting COLA (CPI-W with the Chained CPI-U) that would result in a lower COLA over time. Also, no COLA’s would be provided to high income earners.  

Social Security is considered the third rail a nation’s politics.  Political pundits say that contact with the rail is like touching this high-voltage rail that can result in “political suicide.”  That is why the GOP-controlled House Budget Committee has proposed to create a fiscal commission to give lawmakers political cover to enact the cuts without having to vote on the record.  

Over two months ago, the most recent budget hammered out by the Republican Study Committee, endorsed by 80 percent of the House Republicans, calls for over $1.5 trillion in cuts to Social Security in just the next ten years., including an increase in the retirement age to 69 and cutting disability benefits Medicare costs for seniors by taking away Medicare’s authority to negotiate drug costs, repealing a $ 35 insulin, and $ 2,000 out-of-pocket cap in the Inflation Reduction Act. 

 Additionally, the House GOP budget transitions Medicare to a premium support system that the Congressional Budget Office has found would raises premiums for many seniors.  Finally, it calls for cuts in Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program by $ 4.5 trillion over ten years, taking health care  coverage away from millions of people. 

While President Donald Trump, the GOP’s presidential candidate, has previous said he wouldn’t make cuts to Social Security, recent interviews reveal a change.  According to a March 11, 2024 web posting by CNN’s Kate Sullivan and Tami Luhby, former President Donald Trump, the Republican candidate for president, “suggested[ in a CNBC interview] he was open to making cuts to Social Security and Medicare after opposing touching the entitlement programs and attacking his GOP presidential primary rivals over the issue.”

At the Polls

Legislative proposals to fix the ailing Social Security and Medicare programs are different as night and day. Rather than to  continue to debate the fine points, let’s put the differing policies on the ballot. With just 177 days left before the upcoming November presidential election, Congress must vote on Democratic and Republican legislative proposals, detailing differing provisions as to how these programs can increase the financial stability of these programs. Larson has already thrown his legislative proposal into the hopper, but it won’t see the light of day with a GOP controlled House.    

Last year, 66 million Americans received Social Security benefits.  This year’s Trustee’s report must send a clear message to these beneficiaries that how Congress acts during the next decade will either make or break the Social Security program. 

So, now House Speaker Mike Johnson, (R-La) and Senate President Charles E. Schumer (D- NY) must allow a vote on both Republican and Democratic legislative proposals in their respective chambers.  Let Senate and House lawmakers go on the record and publicly be tied to a vote as to which legislative political strategy they endorse to financially shore up Social Security and Medicare.  Of course, this can give voters a score card. And if this political issue is as important to them as the economy, abortion, and immigration, they can decide at the ballot box who they should bring back to Capitol Hill. 

That’s the American way to do it.