Tag Archives for Senate Finance Committee

Lawmakers to Consider Funding for Vaccine Immunizations for Seniors

Published in Pawtucket Times on May 12, 2003

Even with a state budget deficit looming, sometimes putting a little money into a statewide initiative can ultimately save big dollars.  It’s just the right thing to do.

For the second year, the Ocean State Adult Immunization Coalition (OSAIC) has approached the Rhode Island General Assembly for funding to promote the group’s efforts to get the word out about the importance of Rhode Island seniors  getting influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations.

OSAIC’s message is quite simple: “Avoid a Hospital Stay: Get Your Flu Shot Now!”

According to OSAIC, pneumonia and influenza deaths together are considered the six-leading cause of death in the nation.

Since 1999, there have been 300 deaths and 6,800 hospitalizations that were attributed to influenza and pneumococcal disease in the Ocean State.

OSAIC said vaccinations are a cost-effective way to prevent these unnecessary hospitalizations and deaths.

OSAIC, a coalition of 40 agencies, including hospitals, nursing facilities, vaccine manufacturers, medical societies, managed care groups, the Rhode Island Department of Health, Rhode Island Quality Partners, the Visiting Nurses Association, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island, call on Gov. Don Carcieri and lawmakers to see the big picture – preventative medicine care can ultimately save tax dollars.

Anne Marie Beadsworth, OSAIC’s chair, said the cost of a flu shot is $ 15 and a pneumonia shot is $ 30.

On the other hand, she added that the average length of stay for an older person with influenza is five days, costing $ 12,000.

Since OSAIC was established in 1997, Beadsworth has seen a steady progress in the coalition’s efforts to get more older Rhode Islanders immunized to prevent the influenza and pneumonia.

“The immunization coverage rates for those age 65 and over has increased by eight precent (from 67 percent to 75 percent) for influenza vaccine and 24 percent (from 43 percent to 67 percent) for pneumococcal vaccine,” she noted.

Beadsworth said OSAIC is working to reach the Healthy People 2010 goal of a 90 percent immunization rate for influenza and pneumococcal  for people age 65 and over.

“Through promotional efforts in five languages in 2002, more than 350 flu clinics were conducted throughout Rhode Island with the guarantee that any person age 65 and older, regardless of insurance status, could get a flu shot without any out-of-pocket expenses,” she said.

Furthermore, OSAIC’s gains have propelled the Rhode Island-based initiative into top 10 standings in the United States, says Beadsworth.

“We rank number seven for both flu and pneumococcal vaccination rates,” she added.

Beadsworth said that during last year’s legislative session, OSAIC’s efforts for the state funding fizzled because of state funding fizzled because of state budget cuts. The coalition was just not effective in getting its message out to lawmakers, she added.

During this year’s legislative session, OSAIC is pushing for $ 103,169 in new funding in Fiscal Year 2003-2004 to expand the coalition’s educational outreach efforts and to hire a part-time staffer to oversee its ongoing programs to improve the state’s immunization rates.

Currently, OSAIC is a volunteer-driven organization with its $ 50,000 working budget coming from member organizations and from the community.

It seems things may be different this year at the Rhode Island General Assembly. Support among lawmakers is growing for OSAIC’s ongoing preventative medicine initiatives.

“Quite a few advocates are coming to the Senate asking for funding,” said Sen. Stephen D. Alves (D-West Warwick), who said there is now growing support for OSAIC’s funding request.

Alves, who serves as chair in the Senate Finance Committee, told All About Seniors the funding request will be brought up during the chamber’s budget debates.

“Everyday, we talk about preventative medicine – funding this program is a step in the right direction,” said Alves.

Rep. Steven M. Costantino (D-Providence), who sits on the House Finance Committee, told me he sees the value of OSAIC’s efforts, too, and plans to call for funding OSAIC’s initiative during House budget deliberations.

Health Director Patricia A. Nolan also sees the positive benefits of OSAIC’s prevention campaign.

“Adults need their shots, too – especially people aged 50 and older or people with chronic health conditions. Vaccinations are one of the easiest and most effective ways to stay healthy,” she says.

As state revenue estimators meet to determine the breath and scope of the state’s budget deficit, Gov. Carcieri’s staff continue their ‘Big Audit” to identify ways to save taxpayer dollars.

When the dust settles, even with a projected budget deficit, it may be time for the governor and the General Assembly to view preventative medicine as a worthy cost containment approach for reining in skyrocketing health care costs. Even though state dollars have to be allocated up front, large savings might be realized down the road.

As the state’s final budget is being crated, we must not be “penny wise but pound foolish” when determining what bills live or die in the 2004 legislation hopper. Taxpayers will ultimately lose if this happens.

Bipartisan Support Key for Passage of Aging Proposals

Published in Pawtucket Times on March 19, 2001

The operative word in national legislative circles these days in bipartisianship.

Both sides of the political aisle working together will have to be part of the picture if the long-term care field is going to see any significant legislative changes, policy sources indicate.

Why is that so? In the Senate, “there’s a 50-50 split between the two major political parties,” notes Bill Benson, President of Benson Consulting Group, a Maryland-based organization. What’s more, the division “has resulted in an unprecedented agreement between Senate Democrats and Republicans to share power,” according to Benson, a former top official with the U.S. Administration on Aging.

Democrats and Republicans alike have been following the failing health of Republican Senator Strom Thurmond, 98, of South Carolina.

If Thurmond retires or dies before the end of this term in 2002, it’s likely that his state’s Democratic governor would appoint a Democrat, a move that would shift the majority in the Senate to the Democratic Party.

Yet, Benson says that any legislative proposal would still need bipartisan support to get out of the Senate. “To get a Republican proposal enacted, you will either have to get lots of Democrats to cross party lines, or bring in Vice President Cheney to be a tie breaker,” he noted.

Meanwhile, in the House, the Republican majority holds but a razor thin margin.

“Like in the Senate, if both parties don’t work together in the House, you’re looking at legislative gridlock,” he says.

Benson notes that the Bush Administration is also moving to stall the lengthy regulatory and administrative actions taken by Clinton toward the end of his administration.

One such item that is temporarily halted is Clinton’s guidelines for managed care organizations that serve Medicare beneficiaries.

President Bush campaigned on Medicare reform and wants to bring his proposal to Congress.

His proposal provides a private sector alternative to traditional fee-for-service Medicare by offering block grants to states to help seniors pay for their pharmaceuticals.

This approach may be derailed by the Democratic Party, which added to its seats in Congress during the recent election, Benson explains.

He notes that Senator Charles Grassley (IA), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, has declared that he will not push Bush’s Medicare or prescription drug plans because they lack votes for passage.

Yet, Benson also predicts that the fact that Congress is closely divided increases the chance that something will be done about providing prescription drug coverage to seniors through Medicare. Otherwise, Benson adds, Medicare reform will amount to nothing more than talk this year.

Meanwhile, Robert Greenwood, American Health Care Association for Homes and Services for the Aging (AAHSA), says that bold, revolutionary proposals won’t be forthcoming from the nation’s evenly divided Congress.

Instead, legislators will take an incremental approach toward program development.

“A long term care agenda has not emerged yet,” Greenwood observes. “We don’t even have an administrator for the Health Care Financing Administration, the agency that manages the Medicaid program.”

Greenwood says, in the long run,” We’re hopeful that the Bush Administration will take seriously its responsibility to provide long-term care providers with the needed resources to provide quality of care and to fund a regulatory system that allows providers to do their job while still protecting vulnerable residents.”