Tag Archives for SACRI

Senior Agenda Coalition of RI pushes wealth tax to fund programs for older residents

Published in RINewsToday on June 2, 2025

With the recent passage of the House Republican budget—which cuts some programs and services for seniors, veterans, people with disabilities, and families with children—Sulma Arias, Executive Director of Chicago-based People’s Action (PA), is calling on billionaires and large corporations to finally pay their fair share of taxes.

Senator Bernie Sanders has echoed similar sentiments on the national stage, urging lawmakers to ensure that ultra-wealthy individuals and powerful corporations contribute more equitably to the nation’s economic well-being, rather than shifting the burden to everyday Americans by cutting essential services.

In Rhode Island, Democratic lawmakers are advancing legislation this session that would increase taxes on the state’s highest earners to generate vital revenue for public programs and services.

Proposed Legislation Targets Top Earners

HB 5473, introduced on February 12, 2025, by Rep. Karen Alzate (D-Dist. 60, Pawtucket, Central Falls), was referred to the House Finance Committee. The bill proposes a 3% surtax on taxable income above $625,000—on top of the existing 5.99% rate—targeting the top 1% of Rhode Island tax filers. The surtax is projected to raise approximately $190 million annually and would affect about 5,700 of the state’s more than 500,000 filers. If enacted, the tax would apply to income earned in tax years beginning in 2026 and would not be retroactive.

As of the May 6 House Finance Committee hearing, about 140 pieces of written testimony had been submitted on HB 5473. The committee held the bill for further study, with no additional action yet taken. The proposal remains under consideration as part of ongoing budget negotiations.

A companion bill, S. 329, was introduced in the Senate by Sen. Melissa Murray (D-Dist. 24, Woonsocket, North Smithfield) and referred to the Senate Finance Committee. A hearing on the measure was held last Thursday, and the bill was also held for further study.

As the volume of testimony indicates, the battle lines are clearly drawn. Progressive groups and unions support the legislation, while businesses and business organizations, such as the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce and the Northern Rhode Island Chamber of Commerce, have voiced strong opposition. Governor Dan McKee has not yet taken a public position on the bills.

The Pros and Cons

Supporters argue that with Rhode Island facing a $220 million budget deficit, HB 5473 and S. 329 could raise nearly $190 million annually to fund critical services, including: K-12 and higher education; health care; housing; public transportation; affordable child care; infrastructure, and programs for older adults

They contend that the proposals would bolster the state’s safety net, particularly in light of uncertain federal funding. A more progressive tax structure, they argue, would make the system fairer by reducing the burden on middle- and lower-income residents. Currently, the top 1% of Rhode Island taxpayers control a disproportionate share of the state’s wealth but, when accounting for sales and property taxes, pay a smaller share of their income than lower-income households.

Opponents, however, warn of unintended consequences. They claim the bills would drive wealthy residents and businesses out of the state, eroding the tax base.Supporters dispute this, pointing to IRS and Stanford University studies indicating that wealthy individuals typically relocate for family or climate-related reasons—not for tax considerations. States like California and New Jersey, they note, have implemented similar surtaxes without experiencing significant outmigration.

Morally, proponents argue, those with more resources have a responsibility to help those with less—especially in a post-COVID era when many low-income families continue to struggle.

Yet critics, including the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council (RIPEC) along with the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce, Northern Rhode Island Chamber of Commerce and businesses, warn that such a tax could signal to entrepreneurs and investors that Rhode Island is “business unfriendly.” They contend that higher income taxes might discourage business investment and hiring, harming the state’s long-term economic prospects.

Some opponents cite Connecticut’s experience in the early 2010s, when a handful of wealthy taxpayers reportedly relocated after tax hikes, resulting in noticeable revenue loss. Given that a small number of high earners contribute a significant share of state income tax revenue, even limited outmigration could have an outsized fiscal impact, critics argue.

Skeptics also question whether new revenue will be reliably dedicated to education, infrastructure, and social programs. They point out that in the past, even funds placed in restricted accounts were sometimes redirected to fill budget shortfalls.

Aging Programs and Services at a Crossroads

“Rhode Island stands at a crossroads,” warns Carol Anne Costa, Executive Director of the Senior Agenda Coalition of Rhode Island (SACRI). With a projected $220 million deficit and potential federal cuts to programs such as Medicaid, SNAP, and services provided by the Office of Healthy Aging, Costa insists that passing HB 5473 and S. 329 is essential to preserve and expand supports for older adults and people with disabilities.

“Most of our state’s older residents are not wealthy,” Costa notes, citing Census data showing that one in four older households earns less than $25,000 annually, and 45% earn less than $50,000. Only about 8% of older households earn more than $200,000.

In FY 2023, 27,535 Rhode Islanders aged 65 and older were enrolled in Medicaid, which funds the majority of long-term services not covered by Medicare. In addition, 14% of older adults in the state relied on SNAP benefits to help cover food costs.

Costa argues that revenue from the proposed surtax could ensure continued funding for these essential programs and expand the Medicare Savings Program. Such an expansion could save low-income seniors and adults with disabilities up to $185 per month in Medicare Part B premiums—money they need for food, housing, and transportation.

While critics warn of wealthy residents fleeing Rhode Island if taxes increase, Costa cites a comprehensive report by the Economic Progress Institute refuting this claim. “In fact, the data suggests the opposite,” she says. “Higher-income tax filers are moving into Rhode Island more than they are leaving.”

Costa also points to Massachusetts as a real-world example. After voters approved a 4% surtax on income over $1 million in 2022, the number of Massachusetts residents with a net worth over $1 million increased from 441,610 to 612,109 by 2024, according to an April report from the Institute for Policy Studies and the State Revenue Alliance.

Business Community Pushes Back

At the House Finance Committee hearing, Laurie White, President of the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce, voiced strong opposition to the proposed tax.

“Our views reflect those of thousands of local businesses statewide,” she said. “Rhode Island is already in fierce competition with neighboring states to attract and retain businesses, residents, and talent.”

White warned that the surtax would send the wrong message, particularly as Rhode Island invests in high-wage sectors like life sciences and technology. “Tax burden is a key factor in business decisions, and an increase in personal income tax would significantly reduce Rhode Island’s appeal,” she stated.

House GOP Minority Leader Michael W. Chippendale (R-Dist. 40, Coventry, Foster, Gloucester) echoed White’s sentiments: “Taxing people who have worked hard and become prosperous is an insult to the American dream. We shouldn’t be punishing success—we should be creating an economic environment where everyone can thrive. Driving away high-income residents with more taxes is backward thinking.”

Chief of Staff Sue Stenhouse confirmed that the entire 10-member House Republican caucus stands united in opposition to the surtax.

The Washington, DC-based Tax Foundation also weighed in. In written testimony on S. 329, Senior Policy & Research Manager Katherine Loughead stated that if the surtax were enacted, Rhode Island would move from having the 14th-highest to the 8th-highest top marginal state income tax rate in the nation—excluding the District of Columbia. She warned that this could make Rhode Island less attractive to high-income earners than even Massachusetts.

So What’s Next?

Costa maintains that taxing the wealthiest residents may be both a necessary and viable solution to protect the state’s safety net amid budget shortfalls and looming federal cuts.

However, with HB 5473 and S. 329 still being held for further study, it remains unclear whether they will be included in the final state budget.

“As we approach the final weeks of the session, there is no shortage of meritorious proposals that affect state resources,” said House Speaker Joseph Shekarchi (D-Dist. 23, Warwick). “The uncertainty of the federal funding picture and the numerous holes in the Governor’s proposed budget complicate both balancing this year’s budget and planning for the unknown. I continue to keep many options on the table for this challenging task.”

Stay tuned—SACRI and other aging advocacy groups are watching closely to see what options will be considered by the House Speaker when he releases FY 2026 state budget to address funding for programs and services that support Rhode Island’s growing older population in this difficult fiscal year.

To read submitted emails and testimony on S. 329, go to https://www.rilegislature.gov/senators/SenateComDocs/Pages/Finance%202025.aspx.

To read written testimony submitted on HB 5473, go to https://www.rilegislature.gov/Special/comdoc/Pages/House%20Finance%202025.aspx.

Senior Agenda Coalition of RI unveils its 2025 legislative priorities at forum,

Published in RINewsToday on March 17, 2025

On March 14, 2025, hundreds of older Rhode Islanders, aging network providers, state officials, and lawmakers gathered at the Senior Agenda Coalition of Rhode Island (SACRI)’s 2025 legislative forum, “United Voices for Meaningful Advocacy” at the Crowne Plaza in Warwick. With the RI House deliberating the FY 2025 budget and key legislation impacting older adults, SACRI announced its legislative priorities.

SACRI Board Chair Kathy McKeon gave welcoming remarks, giving recognition to major sponsor Delta Dental.  Serving as master of ceremonies, Executive Director Carol Anne E. Costa kept the three hour Legislative Forum on track.

SACRI Policy Advisor Maureen Maigret gave an overview and highlighted the growing influence of Rhode Island’s aging population.

“We’re 200,000 strong and growing,” she said, noting that within five years, one in four Rhode Islanders will be 65 or older. In 21 of the state’s 39 cities and towns, older adults now make up at least 20% of the population, with some communities reaching over 30%.

The Economic Impact of Older Adults

Maigret noted that 21% of older Rhode Islanders still work, many are caregivers for loved ones, and vote in higher numbers than any other age group. About 12% are veterans, and many volunteer at senior centers, Meals on Wheels, RSVP, and The Village Common of RI.

Older adults also contribute significantly to the economy. According to AARP’s Longevity Economic Outlook report, those aged 50 and older generate 40% of the nation’s GDP. In Rhode Island, retirees inject $4 billion into the economy through Social Security benefits.

However, many older adults struggle financially. “The ‘forgotten middle’ falls through the cracks,” Maigret said, referring to those with low incomes who don’t qualify for Medicaid or other public benefits. Long-term care costs are rising, and even with home equity many middle-income adults will not be able to pay for long-term.

Census data reveals that one in four Rhode Island households headed by someone 65 or older  have incomes less than $25,000 annually, and nearly half have  less than $50,000. The average Social Security benefit is $23,995, with men receiving $26,372 and women $23,565.

Shaping SACRI’s 2025 Legislative Agenda

Survey results from SACRI’s October 2024 Conference guided this year’s priorities. Among 241 respondents (42% aged 75 and older), top concerns included healthcare costs and access, economic security, housing, and community supports.

SACRI’s top priority is expanding the state’s Medicare Savings Program (MSP) by increasing income and asset limits. “Expanding MSP eligibility would provide an extra $185 monthly, or $2,200 annually, to thousands of older adults,” Maigret said. The federal government would cover the cost of those newly eligible. This extra income could help with food, utility bills, or rent and a boon to the state’s economy, she said.

With primary care practices closing due to retirement and low reimbursements, SACRI is pushing for a rate review to ensure competitive payments.

Though fewer than 5% of older Rhode Islanders live in nursing homes, Maigret stressed the importance of addressing the industry’s staffing shortages,  and substandard care, SACRI supports increasing wages for direct care staff, rewarding high-performing nursing homes, ensuring financial transparency, and preventing Medicaid cuts.

To address the housing crisis, SACRI advocates for fair allocation of state housing funds for housing for older adults and persons with disabilities. With public housing waitlists up to five years long, this is essential. SACRI is also pushing to expand income eligibility for the property tax relief program to $50,000 and mandating accessibility features in new developments.

Aging in place is another priority. SACRI calls for adding $600,000 ($10 per person age 65 and older) to the state budget to support community senior centers and enacting a caregiver tax credit to assist Rhode Island’s 112,000 caregivers, who spend an average of $7,000 out of pocket annually.

SACRI also seeks to increase Medicaid’s asset limit from $4,000 to $12,000 to help older adults on Medicaid remain at home. Additional funding for volunteer programs and continuing the “Ride to Anywhere Pilot” are also on SACRI’s agenda.

Maigret also noted SACRI is in close contact with the state’s Congressional delegation to oppose any harmful Medicaid cuts or changes in Social Security.”

Lawmakers Respond

Bringing greetings from House Speaker Joe Shekarchi, Rep. Lauren Carson (D-Dist. 75, Newport), who chairs the Special Legislative Commission on Services and Programs for Older Rhode Islanders, acknowledged the political power of older voters. “In the 2024 primary, 87% of voters were over age 85. I paid close attention to that,” she said.

Carson emphasized the importance of protecting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. “Social Security is a promise. We paid into it. We can’t lose that program,” she said.

She highlighted legislative victories from 2024, including a $10 million investment to stabilize nursing homes, raising the pension exemption from $20,000 to $50,000, and launching the “Digital Age” initiative to bridge the digital divide. However, she stressed that more work remains.

Carson is also leading efforts to eliminate ageist language from state statutes, replacing terms like “elderly” and “senior citizen” with “older adults.” “We’re living diverse lifestyles beyond age 60, and our language should reflect that,” she said.

Representing Senate President Dominick J. Ruggerio (D-Dist. 4, North Providence, Providence) Senator Jacob E. Bissaillon (D-Dist. 1, Providence), chair of the Senate Committee on Housing & Municipal Government, echoed Carson’s concerns. He warned that state lawmakers must protect hard-won progress in light of potential federal cuts and a $250 million state budget shortfall.

Bissaillon called for addressing the housing crisis. “There are 150,000 Rhode Island households paying over 33% of their income on housing. We need 20,000 more affordable units and 2,000 permanent supportive housing units,” he said. He also supports eliminating the state income tax on Social Security and pointed to the Senate’s newly established Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies Committee noting it is important aims to protect older adults from cyber scams. “It’s critical that Rhode Island keeps pace with technology,” Bissaillon said “We have our work cut out for us,” he concluded.

Following the legislative priorities session, Carlson called to order a meeting of the Special Legislative Commission on Services and Programs for Older Rhode Islanders.

At this time, Elizabeth Dugan, PhD from the University of Massachusetts Gerontology Institute presented highlights from the 2025 RI Healthy Aging Data Report scheduled for full release on May 1st.

A Final Note…

It was obvious today that older voices must be heard,” said Director Mary Lou Moran of the City of Pawtucket’s Division of Senior Services, emphasizing the importance of SACRI’s Legislative Forum . She noted that the event provided a valuable opportunity for seniors, aging advocates, and organizations to gather and share the latest information, resources and more importantly hear from the State’s legislative leaders.

Moran expressed her support for SACRI’s  advocacy for the State to allocate $10 per person aged 65 and over to communities  to fund senior centers and senior programs. “Senior centers play a vital role in helping older Rhode Islanders age in place within their communities and offer innumerable opportunities for social engagement, healthy living opportunities, and act as a reliable resource for not only them but for their families and their caregivers” she explained.

Moran also strongly supports SACRI’s efforts to increase the income eligibility for the state’s Medicare Savings Program (MSP). By participating in MSP, individuals can have their Part B Medicare premium covered, and for some low-income participants, the program also helps with prescription drug costs. “Reducing the cost of Part B premiums and, for some[]  who are income eligible, covering  prescription drug expenses allows older adults to redirect those savings toward essentials like rent,  utilities, and food,” she added. 

To watch SACRI’s Leadership Forum held on March 14, 2025, go to:                                                                https://capitoltvri.cablecast.tv/show/10954?site=1.    

To view Larson’s  Special Legislative Commission on Services and Programs for Older Rhode                                                            Islanders held at SARCI’s Leadership Forum, go to:                                                                          https://capitoltvri.cablecast.tv/show/10955?site=1.

To learn more about SACRI, go to https://senioragendari.org/

Retirees reflect on financial fragility of retirement

Published in RINewsToday on December 9, 2024

Literally just hot off the press… the Los Angeles, California-based nonprofit Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies® (TCRS) in collaboration with Transamerica Institute®, released the findings of its 24 Annual Transamerica Retirement survey.  Considered to be one of the largest and longest running annual surveys of its kind, its findings paint a picture of being retired in America.

Retiree life in the post-pandemic economy examines the health and well-being, personal finances, and retirement security of U.S. retirees no longer working. The report’s analysis was prepared by the research team at Transamerica Institute and TCRS. The 25-minute online survey was conducted within the U.S. by The Harris Poll on behalf of Transamerica Institute between September 14 and October 23, 2023, among a nationally representative sample of 10,002 people, including a subsample of 2,404 retirees who are retired and do not work.

Shedding light on the many facets of retirement

According to TCRS’s retirement survey, released on Nov. 26th, fewer than one in four retirees (23%) say they are very confident and able to maintain a comfortable lifestyle throughout their retirement.

“Retirement brings freedom and time for personal pursuits,” said Catherine Collinson, CEO and president of Transamerica Institute and TCRS in a statement announcing the release of the 76-page report. “However, retirees are living on a fixed income with limited financial resources. Many would be unable to withstand a major financial shock, such as the need to pay for long-term care. Retirees’ fragile financial situation serves as a cautionary tale that underscores the imperative for strengthening our retirement system,” she says.

“Many retirees may wonder what they could have done differently to save and plan for retirement, and many may feel they have done everything right but still came up short,” adds Collinson. “In reality, over their working careers, the world has changed, the retirement landscape has evolved, and the need to self-fund a greater portion of one’s retirement income has intensified,” she said.  

Based on the report’s findings, retirees are active and engaged in meaningful ways. As retirees, they are:

·         spending more time with family and friends (58%)

·         pursuing hobbies (43%)

·         traveling (36%)

·         taking care of their grandchildren (19%)

·         doing volunteer work (16%)

·         caregiving (10%)

Although most retirees express a positive feeling about life, others say they are distressed.  Most retirees say they are:

·         generally happy (89%)

·         have close relationships with family and friends (88%)

·         enjoying life (86%)

·         have a positive view of aging (79%)

·         have a strong sense of purpose (79%)

·         have an active social life (53%)

However, three in 10 retirees (30%) have financial trouble in making ends meet, 27% indicate they often feel unmotivated and overwhelmed, 24% often feel anxious and depressed, and 17% are isolated and lonely.

Retirees who retired before the age of 65 are cutting short their working years and income, a situation that could inevitably lead to a decrease in their retirement income. Almost six in 10 retirees say they retired sooner than planned (58%) and, among them, almost half did so for personal health-related reasons (46%) and employment-related issues (43%), while 20% did so for family-related reasons. Only one in five (21%) retired early because they were financially able.

Retirees are struggling to juggle competing financial priorities and debt, the findings indicate. Retirees’ say their current top financial priorities include

·         building emergency savings (31%)

·         just getting by to cover basic living expenses (29%)

·         continuing to save for retirement (24%)

·         paying off one or more forms of debt as a current financial priority (45%)

o    paying off credit cards (30%), paying off mortgages (20%), paying off other consumer debt (10%), and paying off student loans (3%).

The survey found that the retiree’s greatest retirement fears centered around money and health issues.  Forty-two percent expressed fear that Social Security will be reduced or may cease to exist in the future.  Almost six in 10 retirees (58%) expect Social Security to be their primary source of income throughout their retirement, reinforcing their view that the retirement program is the cornerstone of their retirement income.

Retiring before age 65 impacts your Social Security benefit. Retirees currently receiving Social Security started at age 63 (median) which translates to a lower monthly benefit than if they had waited until their full retirement age of 66 or 67, depending on the year they were born. Only 4% of retirees waited until age 70 or later which would have maximized their monthly benefit, noted the report.

Additionally, the retirees fear declining health that requires long-term care (37%), losing their independence (32%), outliving their savings and investments (32%), and cognitive decline, dementia, or Alzheimer’s (28%).

Fear of unanticipated costly long-term care

Only 13% of retirees are very confident they would be able to afford long-term care, if needed – and only 13% have long-term care insurance, noted the findings. When asked if their health declines and they need help with daily activities and/or nursing care, almost half of retirees (48%) say they plan to rely on family members and friends to provide such care. Moreover, relatively few retirees have codified their wishes in legal documents such as powers of attorney and advance directives.

Annual Income

The survey respondents had an annual household income of $55,000 (estimated median) as of late 2023 with more than one-third of retirees (36%) having an income of less than $50,000. Retirees’ household savings excluding home equity were $71,000 (estimated median) in 2023.

Untapped opportunities might be helpful to retirees in strengthening their finances.The researchers say that retirees need to be fully engaged in financial planning or taking steps that could improve their overall situation. Only 24% indicate they have “a lot” of working knowledge about personal finance, 19% have a financial strategy for retirement in the form of a written plan, and just 7% frequently discuss saving, investing, and retirement planning with family and close friends. Only one in three (33%) use a professional financial advisor.

“Many retirees may wonder what they could have done differently to save and plan for retirement, and many may feel they have done everything right but still came up short,” said Collinson. “In reality, over their working careers, the world has changed, the retirement landscape has evolved, and the need to self-fund a greater portion of one’s retirement income has intensified.”

Thoughts about Retirement in the Ocean State    

“I can confidently say there’s less road ahead to retirement than there is behind me,” quips Kemal Saatcioglu, Ph.D., associate professor and chair of the Economics and Finance Department at Rhode Island College (RIC). “Going through this report was an eye opener even for me and I came away with a mix of inspiration, awareness, and a sense of urgency,” he says.

“Asnoted in this report, the retirees’ ability to find purpose, freedom, and joy, even amid challenges shows the resiliency and flexibility we all possess, notes the RIC Professor.  “Knowing that many retirees successfully navigate these waters is inspiring and is a motivator for getting into retirement planning with confidence,” he adds.

According to Saatcioglu, the report is a wake-up call for retirees. The data clearly indicates that they, in general, can be better prepared.  “The statistics about limited savings, reliance on Social Security, and the lack of written financial plans might push those of us nearing retirement to re-evaluate our financial readiness. The survey data will likely create motivation to consult a financial advisor to ensure better use of available resources,” he says. 

Saatcioglu calls the points about life expectancy and the length of retirement striking. “While it may be daunting at first to consider how 15 to 20 years could stretch retirement savings, prioritizing strategies for sustainability, such as long-term care insurance or budgeting for healthcare costs are great steps to take,” he says, especially the importance of mental health and stress management also encourages a more holistic view of our overall well-being.

Retirees must recognize local challenges and strengths. “Granted Rhode Island is not the most retirement friendly state. Higher costs of living, especially on housing, utilities, and food, and less than a friendly tax environment are challenges but knowing about them ahead of time and taking steps early on can mitigate those challenges,” recommends Saatcioglu.

Finally, Saatcioglu believes that the survey creates a motivation to take action—whether it’s updating financial plans, discussing retirement goals with family, or exploring community resources. Retirement can be an exciting, and rather long, stage of life, as long as proactive steps are taken now.

Maureen Maigret, Policy Advisor for the Senior Agenda Coalition, notes that the findings of the Transamerica report align with what older Rhode Islanders are concerned with in terms of their economic security, especially the  cost of healthcare and housing, worries about being able to afford any needed long-term services and a lack of planning to meet those need.  “Adding to those worries is uncertainty about possible proposed changes from a new federal administration for two of the most valuable programs for older adults – Social Security and Medicare,” she says.

According to Maigret, the Senior Agenda Coalition of RI (SACRI) has advocated to enhance the economic security of older Rhode Islanders.  She stated that a recent SACRI survey found the costs for health care and housing were priority issues for the state’s older population.  “That’s why we will continue to work in 2025 to expand the Medicare Savings Program to increase its income eligibility so lower-income older adults and persons on Medicare will be able to get their Medicare Part B premium covered and in some cases co-payments,” she says, also stressing the importance of ensurng that the housing bond funds are targeted toward developing more affordable housing options for older adults.  

“I deeply appreciate the insights in this report. It highlights the importance of proactive retirement planning and the emotional and financial complexities retirees face in the post-pandemic economy,” says Josh Wells, CEO of The Retirement Factory, who stresses the importance of balancing the emotional and financial aspects of retirement.

According to Wells, retirees often feel the weight of navigating Social Security decisions or managing healthcare costs. This report underscores that many retirees are unsure about these critical choices, with only 7% frequently discussing retirement planning with family or friends and just 33% using a financial advisor. ”It’s a powerful reminder that education and open dialogue are key to achieving retirement confidence,” he says.

“Rhode Island retirees exemplify resilience and adaptability in the face of change,” says Wells.  “The report highlights that 70% of retirees feel confident about maintaining a comfortable lifestyle, even amidst financial and health challenges. For Ocean State retirees, this confidence is bolstered by state-specific benefits such as the ability to exclude up to $20,000 of retirement income from state taxes for those at full retirement age and meeting income thresholds, as well as property tax relief of up to $600 for eligible seniors with limited incomes,” he says, noting that these program reflect “the state’s commitment to supporting its senior population, enabling retirees to plan carefully, stay connected to their communities, and enjoy a fulfilling retirement.”

Like the report’s findings, RI retirees are juggling competing financial priorities, especially with only a minimal 2024 increase in their ERSRI pension, says Sandra Paquette, representing the Advocates for Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) Restoration and Pension Reform. Of equal, often ignored significance, these retirees have been deprived of 13 years of potential savings,” she says.

“By unjustly removing a COLA, the former teachers, state workers and some municipal employees  have been plunged into survival mode, where limited, fixed incomes are barely sufficient to cover necessities and essentials. In many instances, choices must be made among prescriptions, heating and food– by individuals who spent a lifetime of service, and of contributing  to their retirement benefits,” adds Paquette.

For a copy of Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies’ new report, go to https://www.transamericainstitute.org/research/publications/details/retiree-life-in-the-post-pandemic-economy-2024.