Tag Archives for John Gage

Senior groups ask House leadership for an “Age-Friendly Rhode Island” budget

Will House Leadership’s Budget Proposal Create an “Age-Friendly” State?

Published in RINewsToday on February 6, 2023

Over two weeks ago, Gov. Dan McKee unveiled his $13.8 billion proposed FY 24 Budget. To members of the aging community, the reaction is that this budget shortchanges seniors.  In an e-blast sent to 1,800 seniors and aging advocates, the Senior Agenda Coalition of Rhode Island (SACRI) described the proposed budget as unfriendly to seniors.

“Governor McKee’s proposed FY2024 budget that would take effect on July 1, 2023, ignores the needs of Rhode Island’s rapidly-growing older population,” noted SACRI, which represents 21 organizations with allied concerns. The budget document will reflect what lawmaker’s value and “as it stands, this budget fails to value us,” states the email.

Calls for creating an “Age Friendly” budget  

The SACRI legislative alert highlights how McKee’s FY 24 budget proposal is “senior lite,” noting that it provides minimal increases in funding for senior centers and Meals on Wheels.  More concerning, “it does nothing to address the larger investments needed to enable a growing number of seniors to age in the community.”

SACRI says the budget proposal has ignored requests from advocates and the community, even some requests that came from the RI Office of Healthy Aging (RIOHA). Specifically, the Governor’s budget did not include funding for additional RIOHA staff, in particular for its Adult Protective Services that received over 6,000 calls last year.

“For fourteen years we’ve urged the state to invest in improving The Point, but our requests have fallen on deaf ears. At community meetings with seniors and their caregivers of all income levels, we found their most frequent and compelling complaints were about their great difficulties in finding reliable information about available support and service options,” says SACRI, noting that very few seniors, or their adult children caregivers, even know that The Point exists. “But they are very well aware that without reliable and timely information about home and community-based care, their least-desirable and most expensive choice – nursing home care – often becomes the default,” says the legislative alert email,” he stated.

According to SACRI, the FY 2024 budget didn’t include increased Medicaid reimbursements to homecare and nursing home providers to raise their direct care workers’ wages and reduce workforce turnover. Nor did it include financial aid to help low and moderate-income seniors pay their Medicare Part B premiums and co-pays, as many other states have done.

The Ask…

SACRI is calling on House Speaker Joe Shekarchi (D-Warwick) and Senate President Dominick Ruggerio (D-Providence, North Providence) to support an “Age Friendly Budget.”  Why not improve funding for aging programs and services that ultimately benefit everyone in their later years?

More older Rhode Islanders are going to need to access programs and services to allow them to age in place at home. “Seniors strongly desire to “age in the community,” but the services that allow them to do that are often hard to find or simply unavailable. SACRI’s budgetary wish list includes increasing the minimum salaries of senior home care and nursing home care workers to $20 per hour, that’s a 50% federal match.

SACRI also calls for allocating $500,000 in first-time state funding for major improvements to The Point to provide information and referral services for seniors and their caregivers. This increased funding never made it into the FY 2024 budget proposal outlined in Gov. McKee’s Jan. 17th State of the State Address.

“With Rhode Island’s aging population skyrocketing, why not add five staff persons requested by the RIOHA, two of whom will work in its Adult Protective Services Program,” says SACRI. 

Finally, SACRI says the House budget should also include a provision to raise the income level for seniors to qualify for the Medicare Premium Savings Plan to save seniors close to $2,000 per year. Older Rhode Islanders are becoming poorer with higher numbers falling below the 2023 federal poverty level of $14,580 for a single person and with 28% of older households trying to live on less than $28,000 per year.”

The Aging Network speaks…from the front lines

Maureen Maigret, Chairperson of the Aging in Community Subcommittee for the Long-Term Care Coordinating Council (LTCCC), says that the “Age-Friendly Budget” proposed by SACRI is right on target with the needs of Rhode Island’s older population.

“More than ever, we need to address and adequately fund the services and supports that keep older persons living at home as long as possible. It is especially important for those aged 75 and over as one-half may need supports to remain living at home at the same time that their incomes start to decrease while their healthcare costs increase,” she says.

“The ‘Age-Friendly’ Budget Plan also aligns nicely with the strategic objectives and actions of the Strategic Plan of the LTCCC:s Aging in Community Subcommittee yet to be accomplished,” says Maigret, noting that lawmakers should view funds requested as wise investments that will help older adults remain living at home – where most wish to be – and prevent the use of much higher costs for nursing home care.

“Apparently, the Governor and his staff haven’t fully understood nor been sensitive to the struggles that the aging community has faced since the pandemic – more than 90% of the deaths in RI were individuals over 60, and 52% of the overall deaths were congregate care residents. Many are still frightened, isolated, hungry, and need community homecare or a caregiver,” says Vin Marzullo, who served 31 years as a career federal civil rights & social justice administrator at the National Service Agency.

Marzullo adds, “The Governor’s budget doesn’t provide any vision for an Age Friendly RI – which was to begin in FY2023 according to a 2019 RI OHA Strategic Plan,” adds Marzullo. “We have no coordinated path/strategy to build greater local capacity & support services for our growing aging population.”

“The McKee administration has yet to develop a Comprehensive Master Plan for Aging in RI despite a series of community conversations (Rhode Island 2030) during the Fall of 2021 and commitments made to the elderly during the 2022 Gubernatorial campaign,” charges Marzullo.

Other aging advocates had their views of McKee’s budget proposal

While they are appreciative that the Governor’s budget proposal fully funds the statutory nursing home inflation index of 5.4% plus a 1.5% labor add-on effective October 1, 2023, John Gage, President and CEO of Rhode Island Health Care Association (RIHCA) warns about a major issue facing Rhode Island nursing facilities. “The minimum staffing mandate that was passed in 2021 is largely an unfunded mandate and is impossible to comply with given the 20% reduction in the Rhode Island nursing facility workforce just since the start of the pandemic,” he says.

“RIHCA will work together with the Governor, the House Speaker, and the Senate President for short-term relief from the staggering penalty provisions of the minimum staffing mandate statute – fines estimated at $55-60 million in the first year of full implementation and nearly two-thirds of facilities being prevented from admitting residents after three quarters of their inability to comply by automatic admissions freezes,” he says. There are simply not enough workers to employ to meet the mandate, and fines of this magnitude would devastate the industry and lead to further facility closures,” he adds.

“The Rhode Island Senior Center Director’s Association (RISCDA) is focused on gaining funding requested by RIOHA Director Cimini for increased staffing, fully funding the Point, and supporting senior centers more fully with a funding formula that gets us to the rate of $10/person for non-institutionalized individuals 65 and over residing in each municipality,” says Robert Robillard, RISCDA’s president. “Shoring up services with funding will benefit not just our elders, but their families and caregiver’s alike,” he noted.

According to Robillard, the Governor’s presented budget includes a $200,000 increase for senior centers across our state. This is split between 39 communities based on the number of seniors living in each of the municipalities. “As we are pleased to see this movement to support senior centers more fully, [even with the additional funding] there are gaps within the system of care for our elders here in Rhode Island,” he says.

James Burke Connell, Executive Director, Age-Friendly Rhode Island, agrees with Robillard’s assessment of the key role senior centers play in Rhode Island’s long-term care continuum and the need for increased funding. “No, there isn’t sufficient funding toward the goal of making Rhode Island a great state in which to age, and I’m particularly concerned that the RIOHA will be under resourced to meet the needs of senior centers and older adult Rhode Islanders in general. Senior centers are the hubs of services and programs in every community, and they need greater support from our state, principally through significant increases in RIOHA’s capacity to support our aging population,” he says.

The McKee administration responds…

In responding to SACRI’s charges that McKee’s proposed budget was not “Age Friendly,” Derek Gomes, spokesperson for the state’s Pandemic Recovery Office says, “a single budget cannot address everything that the Administration is committed to accomplishing.” He noted that the Administration will work every year to make meaningful progress toward improving the quality of life for older Rhode Islanders and all the goals in RI 2030.

According to Gomes, the Governor’s proposed budget invests in older Rhode Islanders by including an additional $200,000 for senior centers, an additional $100,000 for Meals on Wheels, and $250,000 to digitalize an essential record of service that military veterans use to receive their benefits. The 2022 November Caseload Estimating Conference increased funding for long-term care by approximately $40 million in all, across Fiscal Year 2023 and Fiscal Year 2024, including a 6.9% rate increase for nursing facilities.

The battle of Rhode Island’s Fiscal Year 2024 budget moves to the House Finance Committee and ultimately for a vote on the House and Senate floor. It’s crucial that House Leadership begin the process of increasing funding for aging programs and services to move Rhode Island closer to becoming an “Age Friendly” state. Every taxpayer will ultimately benefit, because each one will ultimately have to access programs and services to allow them to age in place at home in their community.  

SACRI is planning a Legislative Leadership Forum scheduled for March 22, 2023, at Warwick’s Crowne Plaza. Save the Date. Stay tuned for details. https://senioragendari.org/

Statehouse Rally Calls for Passage of Nursing Home Payment Reforms

Published in Pawtucket Times on June 9, 2003

In the final days of this year’s legislative session, the Coalition to Ensure Funding for Quality Long-Term Care rallied its troops at the Statehouse rotunda to push for the passage of two legislative proposals that would fix an ailing Medicaid reimbursement system.

The goal of last Wednesday’s rally was to keep the Coalition’s two legislative proposals on the radar map of the Rhode Island General Assembly, which has been bogged down with a multitude of heated legislative issues – separation of powers , fire code changes, smoking bans in restaurants to name a few.

Even with an expected $ 225 million budget deficit for fiscal year 2004, the long-term care advocates, including provider groups, consumer advocates, state policy makers and legislators, urged lawmakers to pay a fair Medicaid rate for nursing facilities, required by state and federal law to provide quality of care to 9,000-plus vulnerable Rhode Island seniors who need intensive, 24-hour-a-day care.

Rally supporters gave a thumbs-up to two legislative proposals ( H 5803/ S 0899). The companion bills, if enacted would revise the state’s Principles of address the inadequate funding of the state’s nursing facilities.

The two legislative proposals, still in the House and Senate Financial Committee, reflected the findings of an 18-month study of B.D.O. Seidman, a consulting firm hired by the state Department of Human Resources to re view and recommend fixes to the state’s flawed reimbursement system.

A major finding of this state-financed study found that the state was underpaying facilities in excess of $ 29 million annually.

These bills call for an additional $ 14 million to state funding for Medicaid reimbursement to nursing facilities. With the infusion of state dollars, the federal government would then kick in $ 16 million for a total increase of $ 30 million.

Eighty percent of the state’s nursing facility residents rely on the Medicaid program to pay for their care, John Gage, administrator of the Coventry-based Riverview Health Care Community and a Coalition member, told those who intended the rally.

Many facilities are left struggling to remain open because Medicaid does not pay for the actual cost of care, he said, noting a number of Ocean State nursing facilities have already filed for bankruptcy of receivership, and some are even closing their doors.

An inadequate reimbursement rate continues to fuel Rhode Island’s critical nursing shortage, too, said Gage. Due to the current  reimbursement system, facilities are hard-pressed to come up with the necessary funds for increases in salaries and benefits to retain nursing staff.

Lt. Gov. Charles Fogarty, who chairs the state’s Long-Term Care Coordinating Council, warned the crowd that Rhode Island’s nursing home industry “is on verge of a meltdown.”

He- along with Sen. Stephen D. Alves (D-West Warwick) and Rep. Steven M. Costantino (D-Providence), sponsors of the Coalition’s nursing home payment reform bills – urged Gov. Donald Carcieri and House and Senate leaders to include funding in the fiscal year 2004 budget to begin the steps needed for Medicaid reform.

Throughout the afternoon rally, until 6:00 p.ml, the Coalition gathered hundreds of signatures to support efforts to increased Medicaid reimbursement to nursing facilities.

Meanwhile, posters strategy placed outside the House and Senate chambers illustrated the rally supporters point that the state is not paying enough for care  of family members in nursing facilities.

At one poster site, piles of dirt were placed on a 6-foot table.  A  poster said: “Did you know this mulch topsoil costs more than $ 5.63 – that’s more than the Medicaid system’s pay for an hour’s worth of nursing facility care for your loved one.  Isn’t your grandmother’s care worth more than the cost of a pile of dirt.”

In a previous All About Seniors column, this writer called for lawmakers to fix the state’s flawed Medicaid reimbursement system once and for all.

The legislative session will soon be ending, and immediate action must be taken now by lawmakers to pass the Coalition’s two legislative proposal, with Gov. Carcieri hopefully signing the bills into laws.

State policy makers must no longer use a Band-Aid approach to fix  broken Medicaid payment system, especially with the graying of the Ocean State’s population. A growing number of Rhode Islanders will soon require this level of intensive care.

It’s time for lawmakers to ratchet up the Medicaid rates to pay for actual costs of care, allowing facilities to deliver quality services.

Rhode Island Nursing Homes Scramble to get Dental Coverage for Residents

Published in Pawtucket Times on March 3, 2003

According to Alfred Santos, executive director of the Rhode Island Health Care Association (RIHCA), one company’s business decision has left Rhode Island nursing homes scrambling to bring dental coverage to thousands of nursing home residents.

Over the last two months, Santos has met with state regulatory officials to inform them of this latest health-care access problem.

Here’s the scoop:

Access Dental Care, a major provider of dental services to nursing facilities, announced in a Nov. 4 member to its 40 nursing home clients that it would no longer offer onsite dental care, beginning Jan 1, 2003. The brief memo cited the extreme physical challenge to dental staff who provided dental services to residents outside the normal dentistry setting as the rationale for dropping onsite dental care.

But a nursing home trade group says that there may be a bigger issue behind Access Dental Care’s decision to not provide onsite dental services to nursing home residents.

RIHCA’s Dental Services Committee believes the actual reason for this business decision may well be tied to a low Medicaid reimbursement for dental care services, said Chair john Gage, who also serves as the trade group’s vice-president. Currently, Gage is the administrator at Riverview Heatlh Center in Coventry.

Gage said 80 percent of nursing home residents rely on Medicaid to pay for their dental services. Access Dental Care’s decision to not perform dental services on site will force m any frail, bedridden residents to be transported outside the facility for treatment, causing needless pain and suffering to them, he said.

“With a severe staffing shortage facing many facilities it will be even more difficult to assign a staff person to accompany the resident,” Gage noted.

According to Gage, it’s not so easy for nursing homes to find other providers to deliver onsite dental services. Complicating this health care access issue, Geage said, is HealthDrive’s policy not to contract with any nursing home to only provide dental services.

At press time, state officials from the Department of Health and Human Services were unavailable for comment about this payment issue.

State Sen. H. Elizabeth Roberts

(D-Cranston), who is chairing a subcommittee of the state’s Long-Term Care Coordinating Council (LTCCC) is currently looking at Medicaid issues, said Access Dental Care’s decision to not provide treatment to Medicaid recipients in the nursing home setting only exacerbates an ongoing problem. That Is, low Medicaid reimbursement  keeps low income seniors from receiving the appropriate preventative and restorative dental care they need.

Roberts said, “inadequate Medicaid rates make it hard for dentists to see residents, because the rates are so far below their costs. When combined with the medical complexity of nursing home patients, the low reimbursement is even more of a barrier, she said.

Robert’s LTCCC subcommittee plans to turn their attention to investigating the obstacles that keep dental care from being provided to Medicaid-eligible seniors in nursing homes and in their homes.

Bringing dental services to low-income children and seniors became an important issue to Roberts when care to a young constituent in the Rlte Care program required the use of an operating room for dental work because of severe tooth decay.

This operation could have been prevented with ongoing dental care, she said, noting that it “took the attention of state government to locale a provider who would accept the low Medicaid provider rate.”

Roberts is working to ratchet up the Medicaid reimbursement for dental care and to streamline the payment process through legislation she has recently introduced. The senator intends to bring together the state’s Dental Society and nursing homes to develop a plan to bring dental care to facilities that no longer received onsite dental service.

Robert Hawkins, state ombudsman and executive director of the Alliance for Better Nursing Home Care, agreed with Roberts’ assessment that there has been limited access to dental services in nursing homes over the past couple of years.

Hawkins has been pushing for appropriate dental treatment for nursing home residents for more than 25 years.

“Medicaid-eligible seniors who are mobile can more easy travel to dental clinics, if they can find treatment, especially with the low Medicaid rates,” Hawkins said. “For the old, sick and feeble, why should they have to go to through the turmoil of leaving the facility to get their dental care?

“Lack of access to dental care is a form of discrimination for those unfortunate to be lower-income and on Medicaid, Hawkins charged.

The Medicaid system has always been “penny wise and pound foolish,” Hawkins said. “When you don’t treat a dental problem early, residents don’t eat, they lose weight, develop bed sores, ultimately requiring costly hospital care.

“Can any one remember having a tooth ach all night long with no where to go?,” Hawkins asked.

Susan Sweet, a consultant to nonprofit groups and a longtime elder rights advocate, added there is also a lack of dental care for low-income seniors that extends into the community as well.

“For some reason, dental care is treated in the health care community as less important as other medical care,” she said, adding that reimbursement for dental care has lagged behind reimbursement for other medical care.

So where do we go from here?

Roberts’ plans to bring the state’s Dental Society together with nursing homes to craft a short-term solution is the first step in removing the obstacles of providing dental services to Medicaid-eligible residents. But a more permanent solution is needed.

With Gov. Don Carcieri poised to shortly release his budget, I hope he and the General Assembly counter Medicaid’s traditional “penny wide and pound foolish,” philosophy by increasing Medicaid payments for dental services. An inadequate reimbursement rate will ultimately reduce the needless pain and suffering that dental problems cause in nursing homes across the state.