Movies for Grownups®Awards: Best film, shows, talents for 50+ audience. And the nominees are… 

Published in RINewsToday on January 15, 2024

Over a week ago, the 2024 Golden Globe Awards, with a viewership of 9.4 million, the highest ratings in years, honored the best films in both the American and international film industry and programming on television and cable.  This award ceremony, hosted by comedian Jo Koy and broadcast live from the Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, California concludes with the Academy Awards held on March 10, 2024. 

However, the Washington DC-based AARP has actively joined in the celebration of the best of film and television by sponsoring its annual Movies for Grownups® (MFG) Awards with the winners being announced in the February/March issue of AARP The Magazine, considered to be the largest-circulation publication in the United States with over 38 million readers.

For more than two decades, beginning in 2002, AARP’s Movies for Grownups initiative has championed movies geared for grownups, by grownups, by advocating for the 50-plus audience and encouraging the production films and TV shows geared to older viewers.  

“Our goal has always been to ignite cultural change in Hollywood through our Movies for Grownups initiative. And this year’s bumper crop of masterworks worth a grownup’s time suggests that it’s happening,” says AARP film and TV critic Tim Appelo, in a statement released on Jan. 9, 2024. “AARP’s Movies for Grownups Awards fights industry ageism, and they’re a measure of social change as well as artistic excellence,”  he says.

And the Nominees are…

Last week, ARRP The Magazine announced the nominees for the annual Movies for Grownups® (MFG) Awards, with Barbie, The Color Purple, Killers of the Flower Moon, Maestro, and Oppenheimer for Best Picture/Best Movie for Grownups category. 

In the Best Actress category, nominees are Annette Bening (Nyad), Juliette Binoche (The Taste of Things), Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor (Origin), Helen Mirren (Golda), and Julia Roberts (Leave the World Behind). 

In the Best Actor category, Nicolas Cage (Dream Scenario), Colman Domingo (Rustin), Paul Giamatti (The Holdovers), Anthony Hopkins (Freud’s Last Session), and Jeffrey Wright (American Fiction).  

The nominees for Best Supporting Actress are Viola Davis (Air), Jodie Foster (Nyad), Taraji P. Henson (The Color Purple), Julianne Moore (May December), and Leslie Uggams (American Fiction).

In the  Best Supporting Actor category, William Dafoe (Poor Things), Robert De Niro (Killers of the Flower Moon), Colman Domingo (The Color Purple), Robert Downey Jr. (Oppenheimer), and Mark Ruffalo (Poor Things).  

2023 Movies for Grownups nominees for Best Director are Ben Affleck (Air), Michael Mann (Ferrari), Christopher Nolan (Oppenheimer), Alexander Payne (The Holdovers), and Martin Scorsese (Killers of the Flower Moon).  

In the Best TV Movie/Series or Limited Series category, nominations go to The Bear, Fargo, Only Murders in the Building, Succession, and The White Lotus.  

The 2023 television nominees for Best Actress are Jennifer Aniston (The Morning Show), Jennifer Coolidge (The White Lotus), Jennifer Garner (The Last Thing He Told Me), Imelda Staunton (The Crown), and Meryl Streep (Only Murders in the Building). 

In the Best Actor category, Brian Cox (Succession), Bryan Cranston (Your Honor), Oliver Platt (The Bear), Rufus Sewell (The Diplomat), and Henry Winkler (Barry).  

But there is more. Here’s a listing of other Award categories and nominees.   

●  Best Screenwriter: Noah Baumbach and Greta Gerwig (Barbie), David Hemingson (The Holdovers), Tony McNamara (Poor Things), Christopher Nolan (Oppenheimer) and Martin Scorsese and Eric Roth (Killers of the Flower Moon).  

●  Best Ensemble: American Fiction, The Color Purple, Killers of the Flower Moon, Oppenheimer, and Rustin. 

●  Best Actress (TV): Jennifer Aniston (The Morning Show), Jennifer Coolidge (The White Lotus), Jennifer Garner (The Last Thing He Told Me), Imelda Staunton (The Crown), and Meryl Streep (Only Murders in the Building).  

●  Best Actor (TV): Brian Cox (Succession), Bryan Cranston (Your Honor), Oliver Platt (The Bear), Rufus Sewell (The Diplomat), and Henry Winkler (Barry).  

● Best TV Movie/Series or Limited Series: The Bear, Fargo, Only Murders in the Building, Succession, and The White Lotus.  

●  Best Reality TV Series: The Amazing Race, America’s Got Talent, The Golden Bachelor, Jury Duty, and The Voice.  

●  Best Intergenerational Film: American Fiction, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny, The Holdovers, Leave the World Behind, and Poor Things.  

●  Best Time Capsule: Ferrari, Maestro, Oppenheimer, Priscilla, and Rustin.   

●  Best Documentary: Invisible Beauty, Judy Blume Forever, The Lost Weekend, The Pigeon Tunnel, and Still: A Michael J. Fox Movie. 

●  Best Foreign Film: Amerikatsi (Armenia), Perfect Days (Japan), Radical (Mexico), The Taste of Things (France), and The Zone of Interest (United Kingdom).  

Tim Appelo, covering entertainment and is the film and TV critic for AARP, shares his thoughts about the significance of AARP’s sponsoring its annual Movies for Grownups® Awards in an article published on Jan. 9, 2024 on AARP’s website. “We spotlight films and shows that feature crucial issues, thoughtful storylines and the most talented grownup filmmakers and actors who speak directly to the 50-plus audience, the crucial demographic supporting the best work in film and TV. Without grownup audiences, art house films, indies and TV that qualifies as art would not survive — and when audiences flocked back to theaters this year, it was grownups who helped lead the charge,” he says. 

Senate Aging Committee tackles AI generated scams

Published in RINewsToday on January 8, 2024

Over two months ago, U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Chairman, Bob Casey (D-PA), put the spotlight on Artificial Intelligence (AI) driven fraud and scams. During the Nov. 16 hearing held in SD-106, “Modern Scams: How Scammers Are Using Artificial Intelligence & How We Can Fight Back,” the Senate panel highlighted the most common scams targeting seniors in 2023 with a focus on how scammers are using AI to create voice-clones and deep fakes to deploy scams and convince targets of their veracity. The hearing also explored how AI is being used to enhance fraud detection technology.

During the Senate panel hearing, lasting one hour and a half, Chairman Casey announced the Senate Aging Committee’s release of its annual Fraud Book, and brochure on AI-powered  scams and a bookmark featuring tips to avoid scams. Chairman Casey also noted he would approach the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to request information about the agency’s work to track the use of AI scams targeted to older Americans.  On Dec. 5, Casey sent a letter to the FTC urging the agency to track AI scams.

Senate Panel Takes a Look at AI’s Good and Bad

“Today, we heard disturbing testimony about scammers using artificial intelligence to make their ploys more life-like and convincing,” said Chairman Casey in his opening remarks. “Any consumer, no matter their age, gender, or background, can fall victim  to these ultra-convincing scams, and the stories we heard today from individuals across the country are heartbreaking. As a parent and grandparent, I relate to the fear and concern these victims must feel. Federal action is needed to put up guardrails to protect consumers from AI—while also empowering those that can use it for good,” he said.

At the Senate Panel hearing, Ranking Member Mike Braun of Indiana warned that an increasing number of sophisticated fraudsters are carrying out AI attacks on seniors by utilizing voice-cloning and deepfakes to create images nearly identical to a real-live  person to dupe consumers into giving away valuable information and money.

“In context of frauds and scams, AI can be leverage negatively – but it can also be part of the solution,” says Braun.

According to Braun, the private sector has used AI and machine learning since the 1990s to combat fraud.  He called on the federal government to embrace similar technology by testing promising solutions to systems that suffer the most fraud, like Medicare.

Gary Schildhorn, a Philadelphia attorney told the Senate panel about his story of an attempted scam against him where his son’s voice was cloned by AI.  When he received a call that sounded like his son Brett, saying he had been in a car accident and needed $9,000 to post bail, he almost fell for the scam.

“There was no doubt in my mind that it was his voice on the phone—it was the exact cadence with which he speaks.  I sat motionless in my car just trying to process these events. How did they get my son’s voice? The only conclusion I can come up with is that they used artificial intelligence, or AI, to clone his voice…it is manifestly apparent that this technology… provide a risk-less avenue for fraudsters to prey on us,” says Schildhorn.

In his testimony, Steve Weisman, an Amherst attorney with Margolis, Bloom & D’Agostino who teaches white-collar crime at Bentley College in Waltham, pointed to the Federal Trade Commission’s Consumer Sentinel report for 2022, revealing that seniors reported more than $1.6 billion in losses to frauds and scams. But the actual amount could be as high as $48.4 billion, he says, because many were afraid to report losing money due to embarrassment or sham.

Seniors Tempting Target to AI Scammers

Seniors are the target of scammers because “that is where the money is,” notes Weisman, because they may have a “life time of accumulated savings that make them a tempting target for scammers.”

According to Weisman, AI has created additional opportunities for phone call scams,  because it can be used to remove foreign accents from scammers voices, making them appear more reliable.  AI created Robocall scripts can enable conversations with the scammer’s targeted victims, too.  Finally, AI cloning technology can make the targeted victim below they are talking to a loved one.

Weisman says that AI can be used by scammers to set up social media bots that appear to come from “real” people.  This allows them to create large numbers of believable bots to promote numerous scams, particularly involving cryptocurrency.

Scammers are now using AI technology more effectively in romance and family emergency scams, too, warns Weisman. 

AI can create fake profiles on multiple dating platforms, writing a grammatically correct biography, making it easier for scammers in foreign countries who are not familiar with speaking English. AI can also create photos or deepfakes for the profile, he says.

Weisman told the panel that AI generating software can create an audio voice that sounds exactly like that of the grandchild, using as little as 30 seconds worth of the grandchild’s voice.

Seeking a Balanced Approach

“The interplay of AI and scams brings forth both challenges and opportunities. Striking a careful balance between fostering AI innovations and protecting vulnerable populations is paramount,” says Dr. Tahir Ekin, of the San Marcus, Texas -based McCoy College of Business.

“In the fight against AI driven scams, awareness and AI literacy are crucial weapons,” says Ekin. “Existing efforts that educate seniors on safe digital practices, such as the work FTC Federal Advisory Council and the “Pass It On” campaign, can be enhanced to include AI related scams,” he says.

Tom Romanoff, Director, Technology at the Washington, DC-based Bipartisan Policy Center, stated, “As the good of this technology is being explored, we must acknowledge AI’s risks and seek a balanced approach, focusing on curtailing abuse while promoting positive uses and innovations.”

“As I stated in the beginning, we must tackle the abuse while driving toward positive application to safeguard its adoption,” says Romanoff.

To view the Senate Aging hearing, held on Nov. 16, go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CMhzgQdz_I.

For a copy of Fighting Fraud: Top Scams in 2022,  go to https://www.aging.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/fraud_book_2023__english.pdf

LRI and Age Friendly Rhode Island Develop Senior Fellows Program

Published in Leadership Rhode Island’s Winter 2023 Newsletter

When Gilda Hernandez learned about Leadership Rhode Island’s new Senior Fellows Program, she promptly applied.  Then the 65-year-old research librarian at Providence College crossed her fingers, hoping she would be selected for the no-cost, eight-week summer  series designed “to lift the voices, knowledge and vision of Rhode Islanders, age 62 and over.”

Hernandez got her wish.  She was among the 25 applicants invited to participate in the program’s pilot year. 

She had two goals.  As the medical advocate for her 88-year-old parents, Hernandez wanted to become an educated caregiver, one who knows how to navigate state agencies to get appropriate services for them.  Beyond that, she wanted to be better prepared to tackle the societal problem of ageism, especially in the education sector.

The program was “what I expected. . . and more,” says, giving a thumbs up to the “exceptional programming and top-notch presenters.”

The newly-minted Senior fellows, residents of 13 different cities and towns, range in age from 62 to 83. Nearly half were retired. Four are graduates of LRI’s core program: Anne Powers, 1986 Zeta, Ron Caniglia, 1987 Eta, Susan Daly 2013 LotaII, and Hernandez, 2017 Nu 11.

“We were looking for a diverse group of individuals that clearly expressed an interest in aiding the older adult population in Rhode Island and could bring an interesting perspective to the cohort.  We were also conscious of building a cohort that included individuals with different levels of experience in civic engagement,” says Teresa DeFlitch, LRI’s director of leadership development.

The idea to develop a senior advocates program came from Marianne Raimondo, 1989 Iota, who made the link between Leadership Rhode Island and James Burke Connell, executive director of Age-Friendly Rhode Island, an initiative at Rhode Island College that represents a coalition of public and private agencies, organizations and individuals committed to healthy aging.

Empowering Seniors to become advocates, activists and champions of age-friendly thinking and practices “will result in a Rhode Island where older adults thrive and live their best lives,” Connell says.

He made a pitched the idea to Michelle Carr, 2014 Kappa II, LRI’s executive director, who could easily see the benefits of the proposed joint venture. One such positive: Nearly a fourth of LRI’s 3000 alumni are 62 years or older, many of whom are prime candidates for the program.

More importantly, Carr adds, LRI and Age-Friendly RI are both propelled by the belief that citizens of all ages who are actively engaged in their communities can make lasting impacts.

Age-Friendly RI agreed to fund the pilot program and asked  LRI’s “talented team” to handle recruiting, participant selection, curriculum planning, and guiding participants in the development of individual community commitments, Connell says.

To get started, DeFlitch says she had conversations with Connell and others associated with Age-Friendly movement during which it was emphasized that older adults need more opportunities to share their experiences and their solutions to age-related challenges.

She kept these observations in mind when working with the team to develop programming.  The resulting curriculum drew on LRI’s long-standing reputation for facilitating dynamic learning experiences and took advantage of the expertise and availability of Age-Friendly experts.

Most session days were divided into two parts, with half focused on knowledge-building around relevant issues, such as housing, food insecurity, transportation needs, and health care.

The other half focused on skill-building, such as writing persuasively,  public speaking and network building, to enable the Fellows to develop and eventually execute their own Civic Commitments.

The Fellows took turns describing their Civic Commitments during their final session, held at the RI State House.  The presentations, which included several “poignant and pin-drop moments,” were well received by the audience, which included representatives from the state’s Office of Equity and Engagement, mostly nonprofit leaders, according to  Age-Friendly Connell.

Senior Fellow Ron Caniglia, 77, from Warwick, applauds the advocacy program for emphasizing the importance of “living in place,” rather than “aging in place.”  In fact, his Civic Commitment — to urge the expansion of Medicare benefits to adequately cover hearing, vision and dental care — would enable more older adults “to live life to the fullest.” 

A retired contractor, Caniglia’s arguments for the expansion of these benefits are passionate and personal.  Hearing loss, if not addressed, can contribute to the breakdown of family and everyday social relationships, he says. This could lead to unhealthy isolation.

DeFlitch has high hopes that the first crop of Fellows who are expected to begin civic engagement within six months of leaving  the program – will have a positive impact on senior citizens throughout the Ocean State.

We hope, she says, that by participating in this program, the Fellows have expanded their knowledge, network, and confidence when it comes to making a difference.

It is also hoped, she adds, that each participant feels more connected to a supportive and joyful community, including their fellow Fellows, and the LRI and Age-Friendly networks.

“We are eager to run the program again and incorporate feedback from this year’s cohort. Working with Age-Friendly Rhode Island has been wonderful and we are learning a great deal from the cohort members about what’s affecting them as older adults in the state. It’s been an inspiring and energizing experience,” DeFlitch says.