Tag Archives for CNA

Staffing Crisis Hits Nation’s Nursing Facilities

Published in the Pawtucket Times on February 25, 2002

A yet-to-be released federal report paints a very bleak picture about the quality of care provided in the nation’s nursing facilities.

According to an article published last week by The New York Times, a draft federal report finds that 90 percent of the nation’s nursing facilities do not have enough nursing staff to properly care for their residents.

Simply, put, the lack of staffing reduces the quality of care provided in nursing facilities, increasing the incidence of bedsores, falls, malnutrition, weight loss, urinary tract infections and blood-borne infections, the report notes.

According to the draft report, which was ordered by Congress, is expected to be officially released by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in April, reaching appropriate staffing in nursing facilities would cost the federal government big bucks.

With a $ 7.6 billion annual price tag, about an 8 percent increase over current expenditures – the report – entitled “Appropriateness of Minimum Nurse Staffing Ratios in Nursing Homes” – recommends cheaper ways to fix the staffing crunch in the nation’s facilities.

Rather than regulate minimum ratios of nursing staff to residents, the report calls for better management techniques and training of certified nursing aides CNAs) to increase staff productivity and to decrease CNA turnover. Additionally, market demand sparked by an informed public that has access to publicly reported nursing staff data may even increase nurse staffing levels in facilities, the report notes.

The New York Times article does not get to the root of the nation’s staffing problems in nursing facilities, charges Al Santos, executive director of the Rhode Island Health Care Association, the state’s largest trade group that represents nursing facility providers.

“While the article only focused on the inadequacies of staffing levels across the country, it failed to report on its cause – a lack of adequate government reimbursement for nursing facility care,” Santos said.

Santos stated the federal report, which is detailed in the New York Times, is correct in its assessment that the shortage is “likely to become worse.

It should come as no surprise to policymakers that in order to increase wages and to make frontline nursing jobs competitive. Medicaid can no longer pay roughly $ 4 per hour, per patient for shelter, meals, labor costs, special care, certain therapies and other items,” Santos adds. “Costs far outweigh government reimbursements for patient care, and chronic under-funding of Medicaid directly impacts staffing.”

There is no doubt in my mind that the lack of adequate staff in facilities create poor quality of care,” says Roberta Hawkins, executive director of the Alliance for Better Long-Term Care, who also serves as the state’s ombudsman on nursing facility issues. Hawkins said she fears that the continuing staff shortage in Rhode Island facilities will chip away the past 25 years of improved resident care that has resulted from state and federal nursing facility reforms.

Although inadequate pay and benefits are obstacles to retaining staff, Hawkins predicts that it will become even more difficult to recruit CNAs when more horror stories about poor care appear in local newspapers or on state or federal agency websites.

“As a society, all of us are responsible for the care not being provided to nursing facility residents. If we don’t provide that money to pay for the best of care, we are partially responsible for that care not being provided,” Hawkins said.

Hawkins sees as permanent fix to this ongoing staffing shortage found in Rhode Island facilities – tie the reimbursement rate to the level of resident care provided. For instance, facilities with heavy-care residents would receive a higher Medicaid reimbursement rate, which takes into account the increased staffing needs of those residents.

But adequate Medicaid funding is not the only solution to the continuing staff shortage dilemma facilities face, Hawkins warned.

“We need to create upward mobility in nursing jobs, improve training specialty care provided to Alzheimer’s residents, bedridden residents and to those requiring rehabilitation,” she said.

The new federal study doesn’t surprise Lt. Gov. Charles J. Fogarty, who chairs the state’s Long-Term Care Coordinating Council (LTCCC) and to those involved in providing or regulating nursing facility care in the Ocean State.

Just last year, a statewide LTCCC study found Rhode Island’s nursing facilities reported a shortage of certified nursing assistants, the staff who provide 90 percent of the direct care to residents.

“The report gives us useful information to look at the issue of staffing and quality in Rhode Island nursing facilities,” Fogarty said. “It also should serve as a clear signal to Congress that it must do a better job of planning and funding long-term care.”

A state commission chaired by Human Services Director Jane Haywood, is currently studying how the existing Medicaid reimbursement system can be improved.

Even with a mounting state budget deficit, it is now time for the governor, state lawmakers and state officials to put the energy and resources into tackling this ongoing staff shortage issue.

With major input from the nursing facility industry and from Hawkins and her resident advocates, Haywood’s final blueprint for changes in the state’s Medicaid program must be taken seriously. With a state election looming in November, candidates running for governor, the Rhode Island General Assembly and Congress must do their homework, study the staffing crisis in the state’s nursing facilities, and develop their positions to confront this pressing policy issue.

More than 10,000 nursing facility residents and their families pray that the report to be issued by the Department of Human Services will not end up in some back office on a dusty shelf.

Seniors Held Their Ground During Legislative Session

Published in Pawtucket Times on July 16, 2001

As the dust settles with the aftermath of the 2001 General Assembly session, senior advocates and providers held their ground with the state legislature allocating small funding increases in some existing programs, but no major expansions or new programs were implemented.

More than 2,500 bills were introduced during the 2001 General Assembly session, with lawmakers considering a small handful of proposals that specifically targeted senior programs and services.

Pawtucket Rep. Antonio J. Pires, who heads the House Finance Committee, gives his take to The Times on the session as it related to older Rhode Islanders.

During this year’s legislative session senior advocates called on the General Assembly to consider increased funding for Rhode Island Pharmaceutical Assistance to the Elderly Program (RIPAE).

Recognizing the high cost of prescription drugs and its adverse impact on the elderly, lawmakers ratcheted up the $10.3 million RIPAE program by $ 2 million. With the passage of the state’s Fiscal Year 2002 budget, the size of a large phone book, lawmakers appropriated a 20 percent increase to support the RIPAE program, stated Pires.

The General Assembly expanded the drug formulary lists of drugs to include prescription drugs to treat osteoporosis,” Rep. Pires noted. Additionally, he added that the state’s budget now provides 100 percent of covered drug costs incurred once the program’s poorest clients spend more than $ 1,500 in coo-payments in a year.

While senior advocates had pushed for more drugs to be covered by RIPAE drug formulary, Pires stated, “We can’t afford to pay for an o pen formulary program yet because of budgetary limitations.” In next year’s legislative session, when more state monies are available, coverage for gastrointestinal drugs will seriously be considered, he added.

“It’s a trade-off,” Pires said, in explaining why lawmakers choose not to add drugs to the RIPAE formulary list but rather to increase the eligibility income limits to allow an estimated 3,l50 seniors and disabled persons to participate in the state’s Medical Assistance Program. This program pays for nursing home care for low-income eligible seniors. The enacted state budget included $ 1.8 million from all sources of funds, including $ 857,485 in general revenues to increase the eligibility income for those who are 65 years old or disabled. Now individual income limits increased from $ 576 to $  686 per month, he said, noting that income limits for couples also increased from $ 889 to $ 921 per month.

According to Pires, the Fiscal 2002 State budget also includes $ 85,000 to continue funding the state’s elder guardianship program enacted last year. “The program brings volunteer guardians to assist frail elderly who are cognitively impaired and without families or friends in decision making,” he said. This year’s funding would allow a full-tie coordinator to be hired who will recruit and train the volunteer guardians. Ultimately, the funding would also allow the program to be phased in statewide over a three-year period, he said.

“We also continue to fund the state’s Elder Information Network Program,” Pires added, noting that the FY 2002 budget includes $ 425,000, a $ 12,300 increase over last year’s budget. Funding for this program provides grants to 15 community-based agencies to employe specialists to link information and services across the state.

This session Rhode Island lawmakers also moved to soften the blow of federal cutbacks to RIPTA by providing an additional $ 2.5 million to the state’s transportation agency. “RIPTA found itself in need of cutting routes to balance it’s budget,” Pires stated, noting that the General Assembly responded to the federal cuts by appropriating one-half cent of the state’s gasoline tax to help the agency keep its exiting bus routes.

“RIPTA may have to make some adjustments to their bus routs but not to the extent that they had fared,” Pires said. Ensuring that buses continue to run throughout the state are important because this mode of transportation provides older riders their mobility and independence, he said.

Finally, on the heel of calls by the nursing home industry and senior advocates, Pires noted that the General Assembly allocated $ 4.5 million with a $ 4.5 million federal match, to provide higher salaries for certified nursing assistants to keep them in their profession.

While nursing home providers did not get the $ 14.1 million, they requested, the 2002 state budget called for a funded study to develop a new plan on how nursing homes would be funded, Pires said. “We anticipate that the modern payment principles that will be developed will ensure continued quality of care for the elders in facilities,” he added.

But the funding allocated by the General Assembly to alleviate the direct care staff shortage and a study to develop a new payment methodology still leaves many nursing home providers and senior advocates seriously concerned about the direction of quality care with the inadequate paid to a shrinking work force.

Based on an independent study, providers found that last year health care worker turnover approached 92 percent in Rhode Island facilities due to low wages in relation to the work performed, stated Hugh Hall, chair of the  Direct Care Staffing Coalition and administrator of Cherry Hill Manor.

Hall noted that certified nursing assistants must complete 125 hours of training followed by a state licensing exam, both written and practical, to perform this type of work. These workers have found they can make as much or more working in local retail establishments than in nursing facilities, he says.

While nursing home providers appreciate the funding that the legislature has approved, it doesn’t go far enough, says Hugh, to address the inadequate wages that the state is funding for direct care workers. “The state continues to cut the same size of the pie for an ever-increasing aging population,” he noted.

In response to those seeking better funded programs this year, Pires stated, “We had limited resources to expend so there wasn’t a lot of new programming this year but quality of life and independence remains my top priority as chairman of the House Finance Committee.” The eight-term Democrat noted that this year’s focus was to ensure that the existing level of senior services would not be cut but maintained with some incremental expansion.