Published in Pawtucket Times on March 26, 2001
Everyday hundreds of thousands of caregivers scan newspapers, senior papers, Time, Newsweek, Modern Maturity or even National Enquirer in hopes of learning a little more about new, effective treatments for Alzheimer’s Disease.
Oftentimes it is confusing to determine which treatments are promising and which ones that are not, due to the diverse opinions in the research community. For instance, one article might report on Vitamin E; others might state how Ginko really improves your memory and is good for Alzheimer’s patients to take. Others might describe studies that indicate that estrogen replacement therapy is not really an effective treatment for Alzheimer’s Disease for some women. Or some might even warn the reader “Don’t eat off of aluminum plate
s” because research seems to indicate that an accumulation of heavy metals, such as aluminum, in the brain may surely cause Alzheimer’s.
Here are some helpful tips for unraveling the mysteries of Alzheimer’s Disease as reported in media.
Beware of glitzy headlines. Time limitations keep people from reading every article in their daily, weekly or monthly newspapers. As a result, many readers just quickly scan the headlines for information. Don’t judge an article by its glitzy title. The content of an article is much more balanced than the headline that is catchy and written to draw the readers in.
Look for authoritative commentary. You can consider an article more credible when it provides multiple quotes on the indications of an Alzheimer’s treatment. The reporter has done a good job in reporting if there is authoritative commentary on the significance of the study. Two likely sources might be staffers from either the National Alzheimer’s Association or the National Institutes of Health, a major funder of Alzheimer’s research studies. Remember that the National Alzheimer’s Association’s point of view tends to be less biased and a more reliable opinion that those of researchers that have ties to a pharmaceutical company that issued the press release.
Disputes on findings. Keep in mind that even if a research study is reported there might be those persons who believe that the study is not well designed or has major research flaws. On the other hand, the study might just be accepted by the scientific community as a solid study. However, there might still be serious disagreements about how to interpret the results or how to classify it. Some researchers might consider it a major study while others would categories it as a minor one. A well-researched article will include the quotes of those who oppose the findings.
Are you still confused by how to cull articles for tips on safe and effective treatments for Alzheimer’s? Where do we go from here? Caregivers should view any articles written about new Alzheimer’s treatments as informational in nature. The article can open the door to the researcher community and it now becomes your responsibility to do homework and find out more details about what the research findings indicate.
If the article describes the results of an actual published research study, obtain the scientific journal with the published study and carefully read it. If the findings are reported from a presentation at a conference, attempt to track the researcher down for more information. Finally, cruise the Internet and check out the official Web sites of the Alzheimer’s Association or the National Institute of Aging to determine if they can provide information about a reported new treatment.
Finally, don’t hesitate to call your local chapter or the National Alzheimer’s Association to solicit their comments. They will gladly share all the information they have. Remember these groups closely monitor research studies and their implications for treatment.